Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )


Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☐ Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ Definitive Additional Materials
☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o


Preliminary Proxy Statement

o


Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý


Definitive Proxy Statement

o


Definitive Additional Materials

o


Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12


Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý


No fee required.

o


Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1)


Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:

Table
Payment of ContentsFiling Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ No fee required.
☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0‑11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5) Total fee paid:

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.






(1) Amount Previously Paid:

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:









PRELIMINARY COPY – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION – DATED APRIL 14, 2020

MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

To our Stockholders:

We are pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. on Monday, June 8, 2020 at 8:30 a.m., Mountain Time. This year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the annual meeting of stockholders online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020. You will also be able to vote your shares electronically at the annual meeting.

We have embraced the latest technology to provide expanded access, improved communication and cost savings for our stockholders and the Company. Hosting a virtual meeting enables increased stockholder attendance and participation from locations around the world.

Further details about how to attend the meeting online, submit questions before or during the meeting, and information on the business to be conducted at the annual meeting are included in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement.

We are providing access to our proxy materials online under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. As a result, we are mailing to many of our stockholders a notice instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2019 Annual Report. The notice contains instructions on how to access documents online. The notice also contains instructions on how stockholders can receive a paper copy of our materials, including this proxy statement, our 2019 Annual Report, and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card. Those who do not receive a notice, including stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies of proxy materials, will receive a paper copy by mail unless they have previously requested delivery of materials electronically. This distribution process is more resource- and cost-efficient.

Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you participate in the annual meeting, we hope you vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy online or by phone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting online or by phone, written proxy or voting instruction card ensures your representation at the annual meeting regardless of whether you attend the virtual meeting.

Thank you for your ongoing support of, and continued interest in, Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.

Sincerely,




Thomas B. Tyree, Jr.
Executive Chairman





PRELIMINARY COPY – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION – DATED APRIL 14, 2020

EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INC.
370 17th Street, Suite 5300
Denver, Colorado 80202

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the stockholders of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.:


Notice is hereby given that the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) will be held at The Sheraton Denver Downtown, 1550 Court Place, Denver, Colorado 80202,virtually, conducted via live audio webcast on May 3, 2018,June 8, 2020, at 8:0030 a.m. Mountain Time (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”). You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020. You will also be able to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting. We believe that a virtual shareholder meeting provides greater access to those who may want to attend and therefore have chosen a virtual meeting over an in-person meeting.

We have elected to deliver our proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We believe that this delivery process reduces our environmental impact and lowers the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials without impacting our stockholders’ timely access to this important information. On __________, 2020, we will send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting and our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote by telephone or through the Internet and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:


1. To elect the twothree Class III directors, set forth in this Proxy Statementproxy statement, each for a term of three years.


2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

2020.


3. To consider an advisory vote on executive compensation.


4. To considerapprove an advisory vote onamendment to our certificate of incorporation to permit us to effect a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a ratio that will be determined by the frequencyBoard and that will be within a range of 1-for-10 and 1-for-200 (the “Reverse Stock Split”), if the board of directors of the advisory vote on executive compensation.

Company (the “Board”) determines, in its sole discretion, at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.


5. To approve an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to reduce the number of authorized shares of common stock by a ratio equal to 1-for-two-thirds of the denominator of the Reverse Stock Split ratio determined by the Board.

6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.


Each outstanding share of the Company'sCompany’s common stock (NASDAQ: XOG) entitles the holder of record at the close of business on March 14, 2018,April 13, 2020, to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.


WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO VIRTUALLY ATTEND THE MEETING, WE URGE YOU TO VOTE YOUR SHARES BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE, OR BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IF YOU CHOOSE TO VIRTUALLY ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY STILL VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON,ELECTRONICALLY AT THE ANNUAL





MEETING, EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY VOTED OR RETURNED YOUR PROXY BY ANY OF THE METHODS DESCRIBED IN OUR PROXY STATEMENT. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN A BANK OR BROKERAGE ACCOUNT, PLEASE REFER TO THE MATERIALS PROVIDED BY YOUR BANK OR BROKER FOR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS.

        ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE EXTENDED A CORDIAL INVITATION TO ATTEND THE MEETING.


All stockholders are extended a cordial invitation to attend the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,             



Eric J. Christ
Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Denver, Colorado
__________, 2020

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 8, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. Mountain Time. The proxy statement and 2019 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. You will be asked to enter the control number located on your Notice.





By Order of the Board of Directors,



GRAPHIC

Mark A. Erickson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Denver, Colorado
April 5, 2018


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

1

Purpose of the Annual Meeting

1

Proposals to be Voted Upon at the Annual Meeting

1

Recommendation of the Board

12

Voting at the Annual Meeting

2

Quorum Requirement for the Annual Meeting

3

Required Votes

3

Solicitation of Proxies

3

Default Voting

34

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

4

Vote Required

4

Recommendation

4

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

5

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

8

PROPOSAL TWO: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

1110

Audit and Other Fees

1110

Vote Required

1110

Recommendation

11
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

12

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

13

Named Executive Officers

13

Executive Summary

13

20172019 Company Performance

13

MaterialChanges to Our Executive Compensation Changes

Program
1415

CEO Pay at a Glance

1415

Say-on-Pay and Say-on-Frequency

1516

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

1516

HOW WE MAKE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

1617

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

1819

Base Salary

19
Annual Incentive Bonus—20172019 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program

(STIP)
19

20172019 Awards Underunder the LTIP

22

Other Compensation Elements

24

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

24

POST-EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
24

POST-EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS24
TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS

25






RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS SINCE FISCAL YEAR-END

27

20172019 Summary Compensation Table

27

Realized Compensation

28
Grants of Plan-Based Awards

2928

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

29

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

3430

Options ExercisedExercises and Stock Vested

3632

Director Compensation

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
4033

Table Illustrating Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

35
Director Compensation37
Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

4037

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

4138

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

4140

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

42

Corporate Governance Guidelines

42

i


Table of Contents


Page

Board Leadership

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
4240

Corporate Governance Guidelines

40
Board Leadership41
Classified Board Structure

4341

Communications with the Board of Directors

4341

Director Independence

4341

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

4442

Oversight of Risk Management

4442

Attendance at Annual Meetings

4442

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

4543

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

4946

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

5047

Policies and Procedures for Review of Related Party Transactions

5047

Historical Transactions with Affiliates

5047

PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

5249

Vote Required

5249

Recommendation

5350

PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF STOCKHOLDER VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TO APPROVE THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
5451

Vote Required

Background and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split; Potential Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split
5451

Recommendation

Certain Risks Associated with the Reverse Stock Split
5452

Determination of the Specific Reverse Stock Split Ratio

53
Procedure for Implementing the Reverse Stock Split53
Amendment Effective Time53
Reservation of Right to Abandon Reverse Stock Split53
Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of Outstanding Common Stock54
Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock54
Authorized Shares of Common Stock55
Exchange of Stock Certificates55





Fractional Shares56
No Appraisal Rights56
Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Equity Compensation Plans and Awards56
Regulatory Effects57
Interests of Certain Persons in the Proposal57
Accounting Matters57
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split57
Vote Required59
Recommendation59
PROPOSAL FIVE: TO APPROVE THE AUTHORIZED SHARE REDUCTION60
General60
Reasons for the Authorized Share Reduction60
Effects of the Authorized Share Reduction60
Vote Required61
Recommendation61
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

5562

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

5663

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

5764

STOCKHOLDER LIST

57

STOCKHOLDER LIST

64
AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

5764

OTHER MATTERS

58

DIRECTIONS TOOTHER MATTERS

65
LOCATION OF ANNUAL MEETING

65
APPENDIX A5866


ii



EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INC.
370 17th Street, Suite 5300
Denver, Colorado 80202

PROXY STATEMENT
2018
2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Board of Directors (the "Board“Board of Directors"Directors” or the "Board"“Board”) of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) requests your proxy for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that will be held on May 3, 2018,June 8, 2020, which will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, conducted via live audio webcast, at The Sheraton Denver Downtown, 1550 Court Place, Denver, Colorado 80202, at 8:0030 a.m. Mountain Time (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”). You will be able to attend the annual meeting of stockholders online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020. You will also be able to vote your shares electronically at the annual meeting.

By granting the proxy, you authorize the persons named on the proxy to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. The Board has made this proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement"“Proxy Statement”), proxy card, the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Company's 2017Company’s 2019 Annual Report to Stockholderson Form 10-K available on the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com. The approximate date on which these proxy materials and the Company's 2017Company’s 2019 Annual Report to Stockholders are first being mailedmade available to stockholders is April 5, 2018., 2020.


ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Purpose of the Annual Meeting

The purpose of the Annual Meeting is for our stockholders to consider and act upon the proposals described in this Proxy Statement and any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.


Proposals to be Voted Upon at the Annual Meeting

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following four proposals:


Proposal ONE: To elect the twothree Class III directors to the Board set forth in this Proxy Statement, each of whom will hold office until the 20212023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.


Proposal TWO: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"(“PwC”) as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2020.


Proposal THREE: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined below).


Proposal FOUR: To selectapprove an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to permit us to effect a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), at a ratio that will be determined by the frequencyBoard and that will be within a range of future advisory votes1-for-10 and 1-for-200 (the “Reverse Stock Split”), if the Board determines, in executive officer compensation, onits sole discretion, at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Proposal FIVE: To approve an advisory basis.

amendment to our certificate of incorporation to reduce the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by a ratio equal to 1-for-two-thirds of the denominator of the Reverse Stock Split ratio determined by the Board (the “Authorized Share Reduction”).


1




In addition, any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof will be considered. Management is presently aware of no other business to come before the Annual Meeting.


Recommendation of the Board

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees to the Board (Proposal ONE), FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmthe auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20182020 (Proposal TWO), FOR the approval, on an advisory approvalbasis, of the


Table of Contents

executive compensation of the Named Executive Officers (Proposal THREE), FOR the approval of the Reverse Stock

Split (Proposal FOUR) and FOR the advisory approval of stockholder votes on executive compensation to occur every yearAuthorized Share Reduction (Proposal FOUR)FIVE).


Voting at the Annual Meeting

The Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"),Common Stock, is the only class of securities that entitles holders to vote generally at meetings of the Company'sCompany’s stockholders. Each stockholder of record at the close of business on March 14, 2018April 13, 2020 (the "Record Date"“Record Date”), is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of the Common Stock will vote together on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual Meeting.


If on the Record Date you hold shares of our Common Stock that are represented by stock certificates or registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (our “Transfer Agent”), you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. Broadridge Financial Solutions ("Broadridge"(“Broadridge”) is sending these proxy materials directly to you on our behalf. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, which will be held virtually, or by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, in person, you may vote by Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card you received. You may also vote by signing and submitting your proxy card or by submitting your vote by telephone by calling the number provided on the proxy card you received. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by way of the Internet, by telephone or by filling out and returning the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you submit a proxy but do not give voting instructions as to how your shares should be voted on a particular proposal at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board stated in this Proxy Statement. Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by (a) delivering a written notice of revocation addressed to Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc., Attn: General Counsel, 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202, (b) a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, (c) voting again by Internet or by telephone or (d) attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting in person.during the meeting. Your last vote or proxy will be the vote or proxy that is counted. Attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you vote or specifically so request.


If on the Record Date you hold shares of our Common Stock in an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, then you are a beneficial owner of the shares and hold such shares in "street“street name," and these proxy materials will be forwardedprovided to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote the shares held in their account, and the nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing it how to vote your shares. The nominee that holds your shares, however, is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. Because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the virtual Annual Meeting unlessand you bringwould need to instruct your brokerage or bank as to your vote prior to the Annual Meeting a letter from your broker, bank or other nominee confirming your beneficial ownership of the shares.Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by following the voting instructions provided to you to ensure that your vote is counted.


If you are a beneficial owner and do not vote, and your broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary power to vote your shares, your shares may constitute "broker“broker non-votes." Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of establishing a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but will only be taken into account in determining the outcome of a proposal for which brokers have discretionary authority, as discussed below. Voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting. If you receive more than one copy or notice of proxy materials, it is because your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. Please follow the instructions on the respective proxy card or voting instructions received to ensure that all of your shares are voted.


2

A complete list of the stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be availableopen to the examination of any stockholder, for inspectionpurposes germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days before the Annual Meeting at our corporate offices located at 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202. The list of stockholders will also be available for inspection atstockholders during the Annual Meeting.

Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020.


Quorum Requirement for the Annual Meeting

The presence at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by valid proxy, of the persons holding a majority of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum, permitting us to conduct our business at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 175,556,184 shares of Common Stock outstanding, held by 69 stockholders of record. Abstentions (i.e., if you or your broker mark "ABSTAIN"“ABSTAIN” on a proxy) and broker non-votes will be considered to be shares present at the meeting for purposes of a quorum. Broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal and generally occur because the broker (a) does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (b) lacks discretionary authority to vote the shares. Brokers and other nominees have discretionary authority to vote on ratification of our independent public accounting firm for clients who have not provided voting instructions. However, without voting instructions from their clients, they cannot vote on "non-routine"“non-routine” proposals, including the election of directors.


Required Votes

Election of Directors. Each director will be elected by the affirmative vote of the plurality of the votes cast by stockholders entitled to vote on the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not taken into account in determining the outcome of the election of directors.


Ratification of our Independent Public Accounting Firm. Approval of the proposal to ratify the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018,2020, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. Brokers have the discretion to vote on this proposal if they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner, and abstentions will have the effect of a vote against this proposal.


Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. Brokers have the discretion to vote on this proposal if they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner, and abstentions will have the effect of a vote against this proposal.

Reverse Stock Split. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote, either in person or by proxy, of
the holders of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions, failing to vote, and “broker non-votes” will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the adoption of this proposal because the required vote is based on the number of shares outstanding rather than the number of votes cast.
Authorized Share Reduction. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote, either in person or by
proxy, of the holders of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions, failing to vote, and “broker non-votes” will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the adoption of this proposal because the required vote is based on the number of shares outstanding rather than the number of votes cast.

Solicitation of Proxies

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. This includes the charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners of our outstanding Common Stock. We may solicit proxies by mail, personal interview, telephone or via the Internet through our officers, directors and other management employees, who will receive no additional compensation for their services.


3




Default Voting

A proxy that is properly completed and submitted will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. If you properly complete and submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, your shares will be voted FOR each of the director nominees listed in Proposal ONE, FOR Proposal TWO and FOR Proposal THREE,THREE. Because brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on Proposal FOUR or Proposal FIVE, broker non-votes will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” Proposal FOUR and FOR one year with respect to“AGAINST” Proposal FOUR.

FIVE.


If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the proxy. The Board of Directors


Table of Contents

knows of no matters, other than those previously stated, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

        Extraction Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and our accounting predecessor, was formed on May 29, 2014, by PRE Resources, LLC ("PRE"), as a holding company with no independent operations. Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Extraction Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC. In connection with the consummation of our initial public offering (the "IPO"), Extraction Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC was merged with and into Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC, and Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC converted from a Delaware limited liability company into a Delaware corporation, Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. On October 11, 2016, a registration statement filed on Form S-1 with the SEC relating to shares of our Common Stock was declared effective. The IPO closed on October 17, 2016.


In this Proxy Statement, the terms "the“the Company," "we," "us," "our"” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms when used in the present tense, prospectively or for historical periods since October 17, 2016, refer to Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and for historical periods prior to October 17, 2016, refer to Extraction Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC, and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.


PROPOSAL ONE:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals for election as Class III directors of the Company, to serve for three-year terms beginning at the Annual Meeting and expiring at the 20212023 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders, and until either they are re-elected or their successors are elected and qualified:

Patrick D. O'Brien


Marvin M. Chronister

        Mr. O'Brien

John S. Gaensbauer
Wayne W. Murdy
Matthew R. Owens

Messrs. Gaensbauer, Murdy and Mr. ChronisterOwens are currently serving as directors of the Company. If Mr. O'BrienMessrs. Gaensbauer, Murdy and Mr. ChronisterOwens are elected to the Board of Directors, the size of the Board will remain at eight members. Biographical information for each nominee is contained in the "Directors“Directors and Executive Officers"Officers” section below.


The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company'sCompany’s directors will be reduced or the persons acting under the proxy will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board of Directors recommends.


Vote Required

The election of directors in this Proposal ONE requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by stockholders entitled to vote on the election of directors. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect on the outcome of voting on director elections.


Recommendation
Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.


Table of Contents



4




DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

After the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the nominees of the Board of Directors as set forth in "Proposal“Proposal ONE: Election of Directors"Directors” above, the Board of Directors of the Company will be, and the executive officers of the Company are:


Name
AgePosition

Mark A. Erickson(4)

Name
58AgePosition
Thomas B. Tyree, Jr.59Executive Chairman
Matthew R. Owens33President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

Matthew R. Owens(4)

31President and Director

Russell T. Kelley, Jr. 

42Chief Financial Officer

Tom L. Brock

4547Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer

Eric J. Christ

3840Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Marianella Foschi

32Vice President of Finance
Marvin M. Chronister(1)(2)(3)

Chronister
6769Independent Director

Donald L. Evans(1)(4)

John S. Gaensbauer
49Independent Director
Peter A. Leidel63Independent Director
Wayne W. Murdy75Lead Independent Director
Patrick D. O’Brien71Independent Director

John S. Gaensbauer

Audrey Robertson
4739Director

Peter A. Leidel(2)(3)(4)

61Director

Wayne W. Murdy(1)(3)

73Director

Patrick D. O'Brien(2)(3)(4)

69Independent Director


(1)
Member of the Audit Committee

(2)
Member of the Compensation Committee

(3)
Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee

(4)
Member of the Executive Committee

The Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors currently consists of eight members, and if the stockholders elect Messrs. O'BrienGaensbauer, Murdy and ChronisterOwens to the Board, the Board will continue to consist of eight members. The Company'sCompany’s directors are divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Each year, the directors of one class stand for re-election as their terms of office expire. Messrs. Owens, Murdy and Gaensbauer are designated as Class I directors, and, their terms of office will expire in 2020. Messrs. O'Brien and Chronister are designated as Class II directors, and, assuming the stockholders elect them to the Board as set forth in "Proposal“Proposal ONE: Election of Directors"Directors” above, their terms of office expire in 2023. Messrs. O’Brien and Chronister and Ms. Robertson are designated as Class II directors, and their terms of office will expire in 2021. Messrs. Erickson,Tyree and Leidel and Evans are designated as Class III directors, and their terms of office will expire in 2019.

2022.


Set forth below is biographical information about each of the Company'sCompany’s executive officers, directors and nominees for director.

        Mark A. Erickson—Chief
Thomas B. Tyree, Jr.—Executive Officer and Chairman.Mr. Erickson is our Chairman, CEO and co-founder. From 2010 to 2014, heTyree has served as our Executive Chairman since March 2020. Mr. Tyree also currently serves as a director of Antero Resources Corporation and CEO of Denver-based Thunder Basin Resources, LLC (formerly PRE Resources, LLC) ("PRE"), a privately held oil and gas exploration and development company, where he remains as non-executive Chairman of the Board. From 2001 to 2010, Mr. Erickson served as CEO, President and DirectorBoard of publicly traded GascoNorthwoods Energy Inc. ("Gasco Energy"),LLC, a Uinta Basin-focused oil & gas company which he co-founded. Mr. Erickson served as President of Pannonian Energy Inc. from mid-1999 until it merged with Gasco Energy in February 2001. In late 1997, Mr. Erickson co-founded Pennaco Energy, Inc. ("Pennaco"), a publicly tradedprivate oil and gas company with propertiesassets in Wyoming'sWyoming’s Powder River Basin. HeMr. Tyree was previously Northwoods’ founder, CEO, and Executive Chairman, from January 2018 until April 2019. Mr. Tyree also served as a Director of Bonanza Creek Energy from April 2017 through March 2020. Before that, he served as President, Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Managers of Vantage Energy, LLC from 2006 to 2016 and as Chief Financial Officer of Bill Barrett Corporation from 2003 through 2006. Prior to Bill Barrett, from 1989 to 2003, Mr. Tyree was an officerinvestment banker at Goldman, Sachs & Co., ultimately serving as Managing Director in the Energy Group. Mr. Tyree earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University, where he currently serves as a member of its Board of Trustees. He also holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Tyree's extensive experience as chairman and leadership roles with oil and gas companies and an investment banker, together with his knowledge of the energy industry, has led the Board to conclude that he has the expertise necessary to serve as a director of Pennaco from its inception until mid-1999. Mr. Erickson began his career at North American Resources, which was the exploration and production subsidiary of Montana Power Company. A Helena, Montana native, Mr. Erickson has over 30 years of experience in business development, finance, strategic planning, marketing, project management and petroleum engineering. He holds an M.S. in mineral economics from the Colorado School of Mines and a BS in petroleum engineering


Table of Contents

from the Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology. We believe that Mr. Erickson's experience founding and leading our growth as ourMatthew R. Owens—President, Chief Executive Officer and his extensive experience leading various oil and gas companies qualify him to serve on our board of directors.

        Matthew R. Owens—President and Director. Mr. Owens is a founder of the Company and has been its President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2020. From our co-founderformation until April 2019, he served as our President and President.from April 2019 to March 2020 he served as our Acting Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Owens has also served as a director of Triple Crown Resources, LLC, a private producer in the Midland Basin, since April 2017. From 2008 to 2010, he served as Operations Engineer for Gasco Energy, working deep, high-pressured gas in the Uinta Basin. While at Gasco Energy, he drilled and completed over 50 wells in the Mancos, Blackhawk and Mesaverde formations. From 2010-2012, Mr. Owens worked at PDC Energy, Inc., an oil and gas exploration and development company with a primary focus on the Wattenberg Field, as an Operations

5




Engineer, leading the horizontal completion and production activities in the Wattenberg Field. He completed over 45 horizontal Codell and Niobrara wells and was responsible for optimizing production for the program. Mr. Owens has been our President since our formation in 2012, which, at the time, was a wholly owned subsidiary of PRE. Mr. Owens holds a BS degree in petroleum engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. We believe that Mr. Owens'Owens’ experience founding and leading our growth as our President and his background in completion and production activities qualify him to serve on our board of directors.

        Russell T. Kelley, Jr.—Chief Financial Officer.    Mr. Kelley has served as our Chief Financial Officer since July 2014. Prior to joining us, he ran the Oil & Gas practice of Moelis & Company, a global investment bank, from 2011 to 2014, where he was a partner and managing director covering upstream and integrated oil & gas companies. From 2005 to 2011, he worked at Goldman, Sachs & Co., a global investment bank, where he was a Senior Vice President. In such roles, Mr. Kelley has executed over $70 billion of M&A/advisory assignments and has led capital market transactions raising over $15 billion for clients. He has been in the energy and financial sector since 1998, with experience in commodities trading, corporate development and investment banking. He holds a MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania where he graduated as a Palmer Scholar and a BA from Vanderbilt University.

Tom L. Brock—Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Brock has served as our Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer since October 2016. Prior to that time, Mr. Brock served as our Senior Director of Accounting since August 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Brock served as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller of the American Midstream GP, LLC and American Midstream Partners, LP from November 2013 until his resignation in August 2016. Mr. Brock had previously served as Vice President and Corporate Controller of American Midstream GP, LLC and American Midstream Partners LP from July 2012 until November 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Brock held the position of Director of Trading and Finance with BG Group in Houston, Texas, where he controlled accounting and other functions for its marketing and trading companies beginning in July 2010. Mr. Brock began his career with KPMG LLP, where he spent 13 years holding various positions serving clients in the energy industry. Mr. Brock holds a Bachelor of Accountancy from New Mexico State University and is a CPA licensed in the State of Texas.


Eric J. Christ—Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Christ has served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since November 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Christ served as Vice President, Corporate Secretary and General Counsel at VAALCO Energy Inc. from January 2015 to November 2016. Prior to joining VAALCO, Mr. Christ served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Midstates Petroleum Company, Inc. from November 2013 to January 2015 and as its Assistant Corporate Counsel from September 2012 to November 2013. Mr. Christ began his legal career at Porter Hedges, LLP in 2005 and continued on to practice corporate and securities law at Vinson & Elkins LLP from 2006 until 2010, where he represented a variety of energy companies. Mr. Christ holds a Bachelor of Arts, with honors, from Amherst College and a J.D., with honors, from the University of Texas School of Law.


TableMarianella Foschi—Vice President, Finance. Ms. Foschi has served as our Vice President, Finance since September 2019. She previously served as Director of ContentsFinance at Extraction from May 2015 until September 2019. Prior to joining Extraction, from 2012 to 2015 Ms. Foschi was an Associate at The Blackstone Group in Houston, focused on mezzanine debt and equity investments across the energy sector. While at The Blackstone Group, Ms. Foschi was responsible for investing $1.5 billion of private capital in the energy sector. From 2010 to 2012, Ms. Foschi was an energy investment banker at Credit Suisse where she developed her expertise in debt, equity and advisory assignments for exploration and production, midstream and oilfield services companies. Ms. Foschi holds a Bachelor in Business Administration (Finance), with highest honors, and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics, both from the University of Texas.


Marvin M. Chronister—Independent Director. Mr. Chronister has served on our board of directors since our IPO in October 2016. Mr. Chronister is currently the owner of Enfield Companies, which is engaged in consulting and investment activities in the oil and gas sector. Mr. Chronister previously served as Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., a domestic energy exploration and production company, from January 2014 until November 2014 and as a director of Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., from 2010 to June 2016. From September 2009 until December 2010, Mr. Chronister served as Chairman and interim CEO of Sonde Resources Corp., an oil and gas exploration and production company focused on Western Canada and North Africa, where he also served as a director from 2009 to 2012. Mr. Chronister'sChronister’s prior professional experience includes roles at Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Kidder Peabody, Merrill Lynch, Transwestern Investments, Kidde Corporation, and N.L. Industries. Mr. Chronister has previously served on the boards of Saratogo Resources, Inc., Harken Energy Corporation and the boards of several private companies and industry associations. Mr. Chronister holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Stephen F. Austin State University. We believe that Mr. Chronister'sChronister’s experience in investing, corporate finance and corporate governance and his service on the board of various energy companies qualify him for service on our board of directors.

        Donald L. Evans—Director.
    Mr. Evans has served on our board of directors since December 2016. Mr. Evans currently serves as a Senior Partner and Principal at Quintana Capital Group, L.P., where he has served since December 2006, and as a Senior Advisor at Energy Capital Partners, where he has served since July 2006. From February 2010 to March 2014, Mr. Evans served as a director of Genesis Energy LLC. Prior to that, Mr. Evans served as Secretary of Commerce of the United States Department of Commerce from 2001 to 2005 and served as the Chief Executive Officer at the Financial Services Forum from June 2005 to 2007. Mr. Evans currently serves as the Executive Chairman at Energy Future Holdings Corp., where he has served since October 2007, and as a director at Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company, LLC. Mr. Evans is currently the Chairman of the George W. Bush Foundation and has previously served as the Chairman of the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System. Mr. Evans received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and M.B.A. from the University of Texas in Austin. We believe that Mr. Evans' extensive experience serving as a director and his extensive financial experience in both the public and private sector qualify him for service on our board of directors.

John S. Gaensbauer—Independent Director. Mr. Gaensbauer serves as a member of our board of directors, where he has served since our inception. Mr. Gaensbauer is currently a Managing Director in the Natural Resources Group at Capstone Headwaters LLC, a Denver-based investment banking firm ("(“Capstone Headwaters"Headwaters”). Prior to joining Capstone Headwaters in May 2016, Mr. Gaensbauer was a partner at Sierra Partners LLC, a Denver-based, private advisory group providing strategic advisory services to clients in the global resource industry ("(“Sierra Partners"

6




Partners”), a role he held since 2007. Prior to Sierra Partners, Mr. Gaensbauer served as Group Executive, Investor Relations for Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont"(“Newmont”). Prior to that, Mr. Gaensbauer served as in-house counsel to Newmont, managing the legal affairs and transactions for Newmont'sNewmont’s West African, Central Asian and European operations, as well as counsel to Newmont'sNewmont’s Treasury Group and Newmont Capital, Newmont'sNewmont’s in-house merchant banking group. Prior to joining Newmont, Mr. Gaensbauer practiced corporate and transactional law at Ballard Spahr LLP. Mr. Gaensbauer is currently a director of PRE Resources, LLC, a position he has held since February 2011. Mr. Gaensbauer holds a B.A. degree from Cornell University and Masters of Finance and JDJ.D. degrees from the University of Denver. Mr. Gaensbauer has an extensive background in international mining and natural resource transactions and finance which we believe qualify him for service on our board of directors.

Peter A. Leidel—Independent Director. Mr. Leidel has served as a member of our board of directors since our inception and as a director of PRE since June 2012.inception. Mr. Leidel is a member of Yorktown Partners LLC ("Yorktown"(“Yorktown”), a position he has held since he co-founded it in September 1990.


Table of Contents

Previously, he was a partner of Dillon, Read & Co. Inc.'s’s venture capital group, an investment bank, held corporate treasury positions at Mobil Corporation, an oil and gas company, and worked for KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, and for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Leidel is a director of Mid-Con Energy Partners L.P., Thunder Basin Resources, LLC and Carbon Natural Gas Company and is also a director of certain non-public companies in the energy industry in which Yorktown'sYorktown’s funds hold equity interests. He is also a director of the University of Wisconsin Foundation. He is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin, with a BBA degree in accounting and of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, with an MBA. We believe that Mr. Leidel'sLeidel’s strong accounting background and previous experience serving as director of various public companies engaged in the oil and natural gas industry qualify him for service on our board of directors.


Wayne W. Murdy—Lead Independent Director. Mr. Murdy has served on our board of directors since December 2016. Since June 2009, Mr. Murdy has also served as a director of BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc, a multinational mining, metals and petroleum company. Prior to that, Mr. Murdypreviously served as Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation from 2001 to 2007, where he also served as Chairman from 2002 to 2007. Mr. Murdy is also a former Chairman of the International Council on Mining and Metals, a former Director of the U.S. Mining Association and a former member of the Manufacturing Council of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Mr. Murdy has previously served as a director of Weyerhaeuser Company, and Qwest Communications International Inc., BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc. Mr. Murdy received his B.S. in Business Administration from California State University at Long Beach. We believe that Mr. Murdy'sMurdy’s extensive experience in the oil and gas industry as well as his financial and corporate finance experience qualify him for service on our board of directors.


Patrick D. O'Brien—O’Brien—Independent Director. Mr. O'Brien has served on our board of directors since our IPO in October 2016. Since September 2011, Mr. O'Brien has served as an advisor to PRE and, since July 2012, Mr. O'Brien has served as a board member of, and advisor to, Elk Meadows Energy Corporation, a private oil and gas exploration and production company. From 2003 until 2010, Mr. O'Brien served as CEO of American Oil & Gas, which was acquired by Hess Corporation. Mr. O'Brien co-founded Tower Colombia Corporation in 1995 and served as its CEO and President. He co-founded Tower Energy Corporation in 1984 and Tower Drilling Company in 1980. In 1980, he joined Montana Power Company as Senior Petroleum Engineer with the responsibility for design, long-range planning and performance economics for its exploration and development programs. He joined the Colorado Interstate Gas Company in 1974, where he was responsible for the design, acquisition and development of company-owned gas storage fields. Mr. O'Brien began his career in the oil and gas industry with the Dowell Division of Dow Chemical Company, where he engineered and supervised all phases of well stimulation and cementing. He has over 30 years of experience working the DJ Basin and the Powder River Basin. Mr. O'Brien received his B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Montana Tech. We believe that Mr. O'Brien's extensive experience in the oil and gas industry generally and in our geographic area of operation specifically qualifies him for service on our board of directors.


Audrey Robertson —Independent Director. Ms. Robertson has served on our board of directors since September 2019. She is a co-founder and Chief Financial Officer of Franklin Mountain Energy, LLC, a private oil and gas company operating in the core of the Delaware Basin in southeast New Mexico. Previously, Ms. Robertson was a co-founder and Managing Partner of Copper Trail Partners, LLC, a $50 million energy and private equity platform based in Denver and focused on direct ownership of mineral and working interests in the Rocky Mountain region. She spent 13 years as a Partner and Senior Managing Director at Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, and prior to that, as an investment banker with Goldman Sachs & Co. Ms. Robertson is the co-founder of the Westside Women in Finance and former chairman of the board of advisors of ACE Scholarships. She is currently a trustee and board member of ACE Scholarships. Ms. Robertson remains an active member of the National Western Stock Show Association and is also involved with the Private Equity Women’s Investor Network, 85 Broads, YPO’s Rocky Mountain Chapter and the Women in Oil & Gas Association. She holds a degree in Applied Economics from Cornell University and a Master of Accounting from the University of Southern California. We believe that Ms.
7




Robertson’s strong finance background and previous experience in leadership roles at oil and gas companies qualify her for service on our board of directors.

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors held five13 meetings in 2017.2019. During 2017,2019, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors on which that director served.


Executive Sessions. The Board of Directors holds regular executive sessions in which the independent directors meet without any non-independent directors or other members of management. The purpose of these executive sessions is to promote open and candid discussion among the independent directors. The Lead Independent Director presides at these meetings and provides the Board of Directors'Directors’ guidance and feedback to our management team. The Board of Directors designated


Table of Contents

Peter A. Leidel as the Lead Director in March 2017, and Mr. Leidel served as Lead Director until the Board of Directors designated Wayne Murdy to serve as the Lead Independent Director in March 2018.


The Board of Directors has foursix standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Executive Committee, the Hedging Committee and the ExecutiveFinance Committee.


The Board of Directors and each Committee of the Board of Directors expects to meet a minimum of four times per calendar year in 20182020 and future years and the Board of Directors expects each Committee of the Board of Directors to meet between two and four times per calendar year in 2020 and future years.


Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Chronister, EvansGaensbauer and Murdy and Ms. Robertson, and Mr. Murdy serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Gaensbauer was appointed to the Audit Committee in July 2019 and Ms. Robertson was appointed to the Audit Committee when she joined the Board in September 2019. Donald Evans was a member of the Audit Committee until he departed the Board in July 2019. The Audit Committee held sixfive meetings in 2017.2019. Additional information regarding the functions performed by the Audit Committee and its membership is set forth in the "Audit“Audit Committee Report"Report” included herein and also in the "Audit“Audit Committee Charter"Charter” that is posted on the Company'sCompany’s website at www.extractionog.com.


Compensation Committee. Responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in the "Compensation“Compensation Committee Charter"Charter” that is posted on the Company'sCompany’s website atwww.extractionog.com, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:


review, evaluate and approve the agreements, plans, policies and programs of the Company to compensate the Company'sCompany’s executive officers and directors;


review and discuss with the Company'sCompany’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement;


produce the Compensation Committee Report as required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K included in this Proxy Statement;


otherwise discharge the Board'sBoard’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company'sCompany’s executive officers and directors; and


perform such other functions as the Board may assign to the Committee from time to time.


The Compensation Committee is delegated all authority of the Board of Directors as may be required or advisable to fulfill its purposes. The Compensation Committee may delegate to its Chairman, any one of its members or any subcommittee it may form the responsibility and authority for any particular matter as it deems appropriate from time to time under the circumstances. Meetings may, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, include members of the Company'sCompany’s management, other members of the Board of Directors, consultants or advisors and such other persons as the Compensation Committee believes to be necessary or appropriate. The Compensation Committee will consult with the Company'sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer when evaluating the
8




performance of, and setting the compensation for, the Company'sCompany’s executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.


The Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain and determine funding for legal counsel, compensation consultants, as well as other experts and advisors (collectively, "Committee Advisors"“Committee Advisors”), including the authority to retain, approve the fees payable to, amend the engagement with and terminate any Committee Advisor, as it deems necessary or appropriate to fulfill its responsibilities.


The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Chronister, Gaensbauer, Leidel and O'BrienO’Brien and Mr. Chronister serves as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Gaensbauer was appointed to the Compensation Committee in May 2019. The Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2017.

2019.


Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee advises the Board, makes recommendations regarding appropriate corporate governance practices and assists the Board in implementing those practices. The Nominating and Governance Committee further assists the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with the criteria


Table of Contents

approved by the Board, and by recommending director nominees to the Board for election at the annual meetings of stockholders or for appointment to fill vacancies on the Board. Additional information regarding the functions performed by the Nominating and Governance Committee is set forth in the "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” and "Stockholder“Stockholder Proposals; Identification of Director Candidates"Candidates” sections included herein and also in the "Nominating“Nominating and Governance Committee Charter"Charter” that is posted on the Company'sCompany’s website at www.extractionog.com.


The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Chronister, Leidel, Murdy and O'Brien,O’Brien, and Mr. Leidel serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee held fourthree meetings in 2017.

2019.


Executive Committee. The executive committeeExecutive Committee is responsible for assisting the Board and the Audit Committee in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities with respect to the annual review of the Company'sCompany’s oil and natural gas reserves and of any independent qualified reserves consultant; assisting the Board in the development, implementation and monitoring of the Company'sCompany’s health, safety and environment policies; and assisting the Board and the management of the Company in their oversight of the Company'sCompany’s long-term strategy development and implementation. The Executive Committee has adopted a charter that is posted on the Company'sCompany’s website at www.extractionog.com.


The members of the executive committeeExecutive Committee are Messrs. Erickson, Evans, Leidel, O'Brien andO’Brien, Owens and Tyree, and Mr. O'BrienO’Brien serves as Chairman of the Executive Committee.


Table Mr. Tyree was appointed to the Executive Committee when he joined the Board in March 2020. Mark Erickson and Donald Evans were members of Contents

the Executive Committee until they departed the Board in March 2020 and July 2019, respectively.


Hedging Committee. The Hedging Committee was established by the Board of Directors in December 2018 to assist the Board in providing oversight to the Company with respect to its commodity hedging activities. The members of the Hedging Committee are Messrs. Chronister and Gaensbauer, and Mr. Leidel serves as Chairman of the Hedging Committee. The Board expects the Hedging Committee to meet periodically as needed.

Finance Committee. The Finance Committee was established by the Board of Directors in December 2019 to assist the Board in providing oversight to the Company with respect to strategic initiatives to simplify and improve the Company’s capital structure and with respect to debt reduction efforts. The members of the Finance Committee are Mr. Leidel and Ms. Robertson, and Mr. Gaensbauer serves as Chairman of the Finance Committee. The Board expects the Finance Committee to meet periodically as needed.
9




PROPOSAL TWO:
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2020. The audit of the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was completed by PwC on February 27, 2018.

March 12, 2020.


The Board of Directors is submitting the appointment of PwC for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The submission of this matter for approval by stockholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment of that firm as the Company'sCompany’s auditors.


However, the Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Company'sCompany’s auditors. The stockholders'stockholders’ ratification of the appointment of PwC does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change auditors at any time.


Audit and Other Fees

The table below sets forth the aggregate fees billed by PwC, the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm, for the last two fiscal years (in thousands):

 
 2017 2016 

Audit Fees(1)

 $1,928,922 $2,088,238 

Audit-Related Fees

  15,000   

Tax Fees

  46,122  65,000 

All Other Fees

  2,766   

Total

 $1,992,810 $2,153,238 

20192018
Audit Fees(1)$1,848,275  $1,832,965  
Audit-Related Fees—  30,000  
Tax Fees159,180  108,569  
All Other Fees2,778  2,766  
Total$2,010,233  $1,974,300  
___________________________
(1)
Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for (a) the audit of our annual financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and a review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (b) the filing of our registration statements for equity securities offerings, (c) the audit of the annual stand-alone financial statements of our subsidiary, (d) services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those years and (d)(e) accounting consultations.


The charter of the Audit Committee and its pre-approval policy require that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve the plan and scope of PwC'sPwC’s audit, audit-related, tax and other services. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services described above.


The Company expects that representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.


Vote Required

Approval of Proposal TWO requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast FOR or AGAINST and abstentions with respect to this Proposal TWO will be counted as shares entitled to vote on the Proposal. For these purposes, brokers have the discretion to vote if they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner. A vote to ABSTAIN will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Proposal.


10




Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.2020.


11


Table of Contents




COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be "filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC with management of the Company, and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

2019.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Marvin M. Chronister, Chairman
John S. Gaensbauer, Member
Peter A. Leidel, Member
Patrick D. O’Brien, Member

12




Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors



Marvin M. Chronister, Chairman
Peter A. Leidel, Member
Patrick D. O'Brien, Member

Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information about our rationale and policies with regard toregarding the compensation of the executive officers who arewere our "Named“Named Executive Officers"Officers” for 2017. Our Named Executive Officers include2019, including all individuals who served as our principal executive officer (Mr. Owens and Mr. Erickson), all individuals who served as our principal financial officer (Mr. Kelley and the threeMr. Brock), and our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officerofficers and principal financial officer.officers who were serving at the end of 2019 (Mr. Christ and Ms. Foschi). Our Named Executive Officers for 2017 include:

2019 consist of:

NamePrincipal Position
Matthew R. OwensPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Mark A. EricksonFormer Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Matthew R. OwensPresident and Director
Russell T. Kelley, Jr.Former Chief Financial Officer
Tom L. BrockVice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Eric J. ChristVice President, General Counsel &and Corporate Secretary
Marianella FoschiVice President of Finance


Other than the individuals listed above, no other individuals served as executive officers for us in 2019. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is intended to provide context for the tabular disclosure provided in the executive compensation tables below and to provide investors with the material information necessary to an understanding of our compensation policies and decisions.


Executive Summary

We are an independent oil and natural gas company operating in the DJ Basin, where we develop unconventional oil and natural gas reserves. As we efficiently and responsibly grow reserves, production, and cash flow by developing our liquids richliquids-rich resource base, we seek to create long-term value for our stockholders, employees, energy consumers, and the communities in which we work. With these goals in mind, our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate, and appropriately reward talented and experienced executives while ensuring that the interests of the Named Executive Officers are aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.


2017
2019 Company Performance

Despite the headwinds facing the exploration and production industry during the year, we accomplished a number of significant achievements in 2017,2019, including the following:


We increased full-year 2017 production by 73% over full-year 2016 production, with oil volumes increasing 82% year-over-year.generated $122 million and $36 million of free cash flow for the second half of 2019 on an upstream and fully consolidated basis, respectively;


Through acquisitions and organic leasing, we increased our total net acreage by 131,600 acres during 2017, representing a 59% increase year-over-year.

We strengthened our financial position over the course of 2017, and, taking into account our November 2017 increase in the borrowing basereduced outstanding borrowings under our reserve-based revolving credit facility andby $80 million during the proceeds from the offering in January 2017fourth quarter of Senior Notes due 2026, we exited the year with approximately $740 million of liquidity.2019;


We continued to develop a strong inventory ofbegan drilling locationsunder our Operating Agreement in the coreCity and County of the DJ Basin through strategic acquisitionsBroomfield, redefining “industry standard” and acreage trades, adding over 1,100 net identified horizontal Niobraraestablishing a new, higher bar for operating above state and Codell locations, increasing our inventory of locations by 44%.federal regulations;


Despite commodity prices used by the SEC for reserve estimation remaining relatively flat, we posted strong reserve growth in 2017, increasing proved reserves by 23% year-over-year.

Table of Contents

    We reduced cash-basedour “all-in” cycle times by 29% as compared to 2018, with our average cycle time on a two-mile well for drilling, clean-out, completion, and flow back to a total of only 10.7 days;

We diversified our midstream takeaway options, mitigating the basin-wide capacity shortages that significantly curtailed our production during 2018;

We built on our strong safety record, which has now eclipsed 2 million employee hours without a single, recordable employee incident.

13




We reduced our cash general and administrative expenses (excluding stock-based compensation)(“G&A”) expense from $2.93/$2.39/barrel of oil equivalent (“BOE”) in 2018 to $1.69/BOE in 2016 to $2.36/BOE in 2017,2019, a 19%29% decline year-over-year.

We generated approximately $56 million of cash proceeds through the divestiture of non-strategic assets in a difficult divestiture market.

We assembled
CEO Target Compensation vs. Realized Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation actually received by our Named Executive Officers should be strongly correlated with the Company’s performance and also the overall stockholder experience. The Committee believes that the compensation program in place accomplishes this, with a large portion of overall target compensation dependent on achieving specific pre-determined quantitative goals and the Company’s long-term total stockholder return, both on an approximate 66,000 net acre position inabsolute basis and on a relative basis as compared to our new Hawkeye development area in Arapahoe and Adams Counties across several transactions beginning in November 2016 and expect this new areapeers. The chart below depicts, for the last three fiscal years, the amount of compensation targeted to be delivered to our CEO and the amount of compensation actually realized by him in those three years, along with the Company’s average share price during those three years. We have included Mr. Owens’s compensation in the chart below because he became our interim CEO in April 2019 when Mr. Erickson took a significant contributormedical leave of absence, and the Compensation Committee recognized Mr. Owens’s service in this role when determining his compensation for 2019.

CEO 3-Year Target vs. Realized Compensation

image5.jpg

Target Compensation:Target base salary rate, target short-term cash incentive program (“STIP”) bonus, and target grant under our 2016 Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)

Realized Compensation: Actual base salary received, actual STIP bonus awarded, and value of equity awards at the time of vesting. For more detail on “Realized Compensation,” see page 28.

Stock Price: Valued using the average closing price for each fiscal year, which was $15.41 for 2017, $11.97 for 2018, and $3.56 for 2019.

The realized compensation depicted here is significantly lower than the compensation indicated in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 27, largely due to the Company's future growth.

fact that the Summary Compensation Table utilizes the accounting value of equity awards as of the date of grant, rather than the actual value of those awards upon vesting. Additionally, some equity awards presented in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation, such as performance-based equity awards, may only be partially earned or unearned altogether based on actual performance under the performance metrics of such awards. The chart above is not intended to replace the Summary

14


Material

Compensation Table. Rather, the Summary Compensation Table and the information above each serves a different purpose and provides a different insight for investors.

Changes to Our Executive Compensation ChangesProgram

In light of the continuing moderation in oil prices and current industry conditions, and the impact they had on our performance during 2019, and the expected ongoing impact on the price of our Common Stock during the year, the Compensation Committee made the following executive compensation decisions for 2019, in an effort to align executive compensation with the overall stockholder experience:
Implemented new annual
Maintained the base salaries of our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer at existing levels in place since 2017. Through the end of 2019, the base salaries for our President and Chief Financial Officer have remained unchanged since our initial public offering in 2016. Additionally, effective April 1, 2020, the Company’s officers took a voluntary 10% reduction in their base salary and target bonus amount for the remainder of 2020.

In the third quarter of 2019, the Board amended the Company’s capital budget to execute upon a more measured pace of development to focus on generating free cash incentive bonusflow and to deemphasize the Company’s production growth. While the 2019 STIP would have allowed the Compensation Committee the ability to adjust the metrics in the program to motivate our executive officersaccount for the revised budget, due to achieve specific pre-established operational and business goals

        In 2017, we implemented a new annual cash incentive bonus program. Pursuant to this program, ourthe negative stock price performance of the Company during 2019, the Compensation Committee establishes specific quantitativeelected not to adjust the impacted metrics; and qualitative metrics at


The Compensation Committee designed the beginning of each year. Actual performance with respect to each metric determines the value of the annual cash bonus paid, if any.

Implemented performance-based restricted stock awards to focus long-term equity on performance

        In 2017, we implemented our new long-term equity incentive compensation program for executive officers. Under the new program, 50% of the long-term equity incentive awards grantedissued in 2019 to our Named Executive Officers vest based on our relative total shareholder returnbe a mix of both share-settled and 50% vest based on continued service over time (as comparedcash-settled awards to 100% time-based awards in 2016).

Adoptedmitigate potentially extensive dilution to the Company’s Common Stock Ownership Guidelines

        In March 2018, we adoptedgiven the decline the Company’s stock ownership guidelines for both our non-employee directors and our executives to strengthen the alignment between our leadership and our stockholders.

price.


CEO Pay at a Glance

To ensure that the interests of the Named Executive Officers are aligned with stockholders, ourthe Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to include a substantial amount of pay that is at-risk. At-risk pay may be performance-based, equity-based, or both. The first chart below shows that 92%85% of our current Chief Executive Officer's 2017Officer’s 2019 target compensation is comprised of at-risk pay, while his guaranteed base salary comprises only 8%15% of his target annual compensation. Similarly,We have included Mr. Owens’s compensation in the second chartcharts below shows that, on average, 83%because he became our interim CEO in April 2019 when Mr. Erickson took a medical leave of our Named Executive Officers' (excluding our Chief Executive Officer) 2017 targetabsence, and the Compensation Committee recognized Mr. Owens’s service in this role when determining his compensation is comprised of at-risk pay, while their average guaranteed base salary comprises only 17% of their average target annual compensation.

for 2019.


2017
2019 CEO Target CEO Pay

Mix

image4.jpg
2017 Target Other NEO Pay

15

GRAPHIC



Say-on-Pay and Say-on-Frequency

As of December 31, 2017, the Company no longer qualified as an emerging growth company (as such term is defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, also known as the JOBS Act). As such, the Company isin 2018 began offering stockholders the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation programs, as described in this Proxy Statement, colloquially known as "Say-on-Pay,"“Say-on-Pay.” In 2019, 97.3% of the votes cast by our stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the executive compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee viewed the results of the 2019 Say-on-Pay vote as well assupportive of our executive compensation programs for our Named Executive Officers. The Committee will continue to assess the results of Say-on-Pay votes with careful consideration of our stockholders’ preferences and will determine what, if any, changes should be made to our executive compensation programs currently in place.

In May 2018, we also offered stockholders the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, on the frequency of such Say-on-Pay votes, or "Say-on-Frequency."“Say-on-Frequency.” 99.7% of the votes cast by our stockholders were cast in favor of the Company holding Say-on-Pay votes annually. The Board of Directors considered the results of this Say-on-Frequency advisory vote and, as such, the Company is again including a Say-on-Pay proposal in this Proxy Statement and intends to continue to do so annually. We again look forward to receiving feedback from our stockholders regarding the Company'sCompany’s executive pay practices, as we value our stockholders'stockholders’ evaluation of our executive compensation programs and policies. As discussed in more detail in Proposal THREE below, the Board has recommended that stockholders vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve our executive compensation programs as described below, and to support annual Say-on-Pay votes in order to receive more frequent feedback regarding our executive compensation policies.

below.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES

Our executive compensation policies are designed to align managementNamed Executive Officer and stockholder interests and create value for investors while attracting and retaining talented executives with the skills and expertise to help us achieve our financial and operational goals. We have a strong interest in the retention of our current Named Executive Officers as their dedication and experience allows us to efficiently achieve our corporate objectives and create value for stockholders. We aim to provide effective retention mechanisms while preventing excessive payments or improper incentives. We strive to maintain competitive pay practices within our industry while ensuring that our stockholders receive maximumstrong returns and security for their investment. We aim to accomplish this through linking our executive compensation to several measures of the Company'sCompany’s short-term and long-term performance. A majority of our compensation program is structured based on pay that is at-risk.

        Our


The Compensation Committee regularly reviews best compensation and governance practices in attempt to ensure that our executive compensation program is designed such that it is consistent with those


Table of Contents

practices while striving to achieve the compensation objectives described above. The following table provides a brief summary of some of our compensation practices.


What we do:What we don'tdon’t do:

Pay for performance, andincluding pay for sustained performance over multi-year periods

No single triggersingle-trigger change in control vesting or severance payments

Substantial portionMajority of pay at-risk

No gross-ups for severance or change in control payments

Equity awards subject to extendedmulti-year vesting periods

No guaranteed annual bonuses

Policy prohibiting hedging transactions

No excessive perquisites

Policy prohibiting pledging transactions subject to limited exceptions with Audit Committee approval

No payment of dividends on unvested restricted stock units and no payment of current dividends on unvested performance stock unitsequity awards

Independent Compensation Consultantcompensation consultant

Representative and relevant peer group

Stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors and executives


16




HOW WE MAKE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has the responsibility to review and approve the compensation policies, programs, and plans for the Company'sCompany’s officers and directors, including administering our 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP").LTIP. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing our Compensation Discussion and Analysis and producing the Compensation Committee Report with respect to our executive compensation disclosures. Finally, the Compensation Committee establishes our compensation objectives to maintain a competitive and effective compensation program. The Compensation Committee, in superintendingadministering the compensation ofprogram for our directors and officers, employs several analytic tools and considers information from multiple resources. Subject in certain circumstances to Board approval, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to make final decisions with respect to our executive compensation program, and the Compensation Committee is under no obligation to utilize the input of other parties.program. For more detailed information regarding the Compensation Committee, the current Compensation Committee Charter is posted on the Corporate Governance page of the investor relations section of the Company'sCompany’s website atwww.extractionog.com.


Role of Compensation Consultant in Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Company ("(“FW Cook"Cook”), as the committee'sCommittee’s independent compensation consultant. FW Cook provides advice to and works with the Compensation Committee in designing and implementing the structure and mechanics of the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation regime as well as other matters related to officer and director compensation. For example, FW Cook worked with the Compensation Committee to design the new performance-based annual incentive programSTIP and long-term equity incentive programthe LTIP for executive officers first implemented in 2017. In addition, FW Cook provides the Compensation Committee with external context such as relevant market and peer-company data, trends in executive compensation, and developments in executive compensation practices. This information assists the Compensation Committee in making executive and director compensation decisions based on market pay levels and best practices.


Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee made the decision to retain FW Cook again in 2019, and FW Cook reports directly and exclusively to the Compensation Committee. FW Cook does not have authority to make compensation-related decisions for the Compensation Committee or otherwise with respect to the Company, and the Compensation Committee is not required to utilize any of the information or advice provided by FW Cook. In addition, other than its services performed for the Compensation Committee, FW Cook does not provide additional services to management, the Company, or its affiliates. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to allow FW Cook to work with management in preparing or reviewing materials for the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s consideration. During 2017,2019, and after taking into consideration the factors listed in NASDAQ Listed Company Rule 5605(d)(3)(D), the Compensation Committee concluded that neither it nor the Company have any conflicts of interest with FW Cook, and that FW Cook is independent from management. Other than FW Cook, no other compensation consultants provided services to the Compensation Committee during 2017.

2019.


Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

After reviewing the information and advice provided by FW Cook, our corporate goals, historic and projected performance, the current economic environment, and any other relevant factors, the Compensation Committee determines the compensation for our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In making compensation determinations with respect to the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee may consider recommendations from our Executive Chairman or Chief Executive Officer but retains sole discretion over final compensation determinations. Additionally, the Compensation Committee requests that the Named Executive Officers provide recommendations on the appropriate goals when establishing the qualitative and quantitative performance metrics for the short-term cash incentive program. The Compensation Committee may disregard any such suggestions or observations made by our executive officers. In addition, thea Named Executive OfficersOfficer may attend Compensation Committee meetings upon invitation to report on the Company'sCompany’s progress with respect to the annual quantitative and qualitative performance metrics, but areis excluded from any discussions involving the officer'sofficer’s individual compensation.


17




Determining Compensation Levels

As discussed above, the Compensation Committee has the overall responsibility for establishing the elements, terms, and target value of compensation delivered to our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee strives to develop competitive, but not excessive, compensation programs for our employees and our Named Executive Officers in order to recruit, retain, and retain the best possible talentmotivate talented and experienced executives in our industry. An important element of the Compensation Committee's decision making isCommittee’s decision-making process includes the use of compensation data produced by our independent compensation consultant,FW Cook, including direct data from our peer group, other industry compensation surveys, and proprietary data developed by FW Cook. UsingThe Compensation Committee uses this data the Compensation Committee willto help evaluate each Named Executive Officer'sOfficer’s individual performance, the Company'sCompany’s overall performance, and market dataconditions to reach compensation decisions for individual officers.

Named Executive Officers.


Peer Group

        Our

The Compensation Committee, with input from FW Cook, chose our 2019 peer group after reviewing the relative market capitalization, revenues, balance sheet strength, and location of assets of a number of similar companies in the upstream exploration and production business. In addition, the Compensation Committee attempted to select a sufficient number of peers to withstand possible attrition in the event of industry consolidation. After taking these considerations into account, the


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee removed Energen Corporation, EP Energy Corporation, Parsley Energy, Inc., Resolute Energy Corporation, RSP Permian, Inc., and WildHorse Resource Development Corporation from our peer group, and added Gulfport Energy Corporation, Jagged Peak Energy, Inc., Montage Resources Corporation, and Whiting Petroleum Corporation and determined that the companies included in the table below reflectreflected an appropriate peer group:

group for 2019:




Bill Barrett Corporation

⋅Callon Petroleum Company

Laredo Petroleum, Inc.

Resolute⋅SM Energy Corporation

Company

Callon Petroleum Company

Matador Resources Company

RSP Permian,  Inc.

Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.

⋅Matador Resources Company

⋅SRC Energy, Inc.

⋅Gulfport Energy Corporation⋅Montage Resources Corporation⋅Whiting Petroleum Corporation
⋅HighPoint Resources CorporationOasis Petroleum, Inc.

SM⋅WPX Energy, Company

Inc

Energen Corporation

Parsley⋅Jagged Peak Energy Inc.

SRC Energy,  Inc.

EP Energy Corporation

PDC Energy, Inc.

WPX Energy,  Inc.


Compensation and total stockholder return data from the above peer group was used by ourthe Compensation Committee when making decisions regarding the compensation paid to our Named Executives Officers as well as for the relative total stockholder return comparison for the performance-based restricted stock unit awards ("PSAs"(“2019 PSUs”) awarded to our Named Executive Officers in October 2017April 2019 for the three-year performance period covering January 1, 20172019 through December 31, 2019.2021. As described in "2017“2019 Awards under the LTIP"LTIP” below, at the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee will certify the total stockholder return for our stock in comparison to our peer group, which will determine the payout level for the PSAsrelative total stockholder return portion of the 2019 PSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers in 2017.

Officers. With respect to Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., Jagged Peak Energy Inc., and SRC Energy, Inc., those companies were acquired by a competitor since the grant date of the 2019 PSUs and will no longer be considered as a part of the peer group when determining performance under the 2019 PSUs.



18




ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Base Salary

Each Named Executive Officer'sOfficer’s base salary is a fixed component of compensation each year for performing specific job duties and functions. Base salary is an integral component of our compensation and a crucial aspect of retaining top executive talent. Since our IPO, theThe Compensation Committee has workedworks together with our Chief Executive Officer to determine the amount, if any, of modifications to the base salary levels for each of our Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Erickson'sthe base salary of the Executive Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, which isare set directly by the Compensation Committee alone. Adjustments to the base salary rates for theour Named Executive Officers are made upon consideration of factors that ourthe Compensation Committee deems relevant, including, but not limited to: (a) any increase or decrease in the executive'sexecutive’s responsibilities, (b) the executive'sexecutive’s experience, (c) the executive'sexecutive’s job performance, and (d) the level of compensation paid to executives of other companies with which we compete for executive talent, as estimated based on publicly available information and the experience of the members of ourthe Compensation Committee. After considering each of these factors, the Compensation Committee made the following adjustments to base salaries for our Named Executive Officers, effective in October 2017.

March 2019.

Name
 2016
Base Salary
 2017
Base Salary
 

Mark A. Erickson

 $450,000 $500,000 

Tom L. Brock

 $300,000 $310,000 

Eric J. Christ

 $300,000 $310,000 
Name2018 Base Salary2019 Base Salary
Mark A. Erickson................................................................................$500,000  Unchanged  
Matthew R. Owens.............................................................................$450,000  Unchanged  
Russell T. Kelley, Jr...........................................................................$450,000  Unchanged  
Tom L. Brock......................................................................................$335,000  $345,050  
Eric J. Christ........................................................................................$335,000  $345,050  
Marianella Foschi...............................................................................$287,500  $300,000  


The base salaries for Messrs. Erickson, Owens, and Kelley were unchanged during 2017 and remain at $450,000.2019. In
connection with his appointment to the Chief Executive Officer role in March 2020, Mr. Owens’s base salary was
increased to $500,000. The total base salary paid to each of our Named Executive Officers for services provided during 20172019 is reported below in the "Salary"“Salary” column of our Summary Compensation Table.


Table


Annual Incentive Bonus—20172019 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program (STIP)

        Following our IPO we reviewed and evaluated all our compensation programs, including our short-term cash incentive program. During 2017, our Compensation Committee worked extensively with FW Cook, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, to design a new performance-based annual incentive program.

The new annual incentive program, the 2017 short-term cash incentive program,STIP measures company-wideCompany-wide performance based upon both quantitative and qualitative metrics. The 2017 short-term cash incentive program2019 STIP was implementeddesigned to provide pre-established objective performance criteria that could be communicated to our Named Executive Officers to motivate them to achieve specific short-term financial and operational goals. The 2017 short-term cash incentive program2019 STIP also provides for an established payout structure, with payout percentages that are calculated based upon actual performance as compared to quantitative and qualitative performance goals. The quantitative metrics allow the executives to strive towards very specific numerical performance goals, while the qualitative factors allow the Compensation Committee to evaluate more holistic companyCompany goals. Furthermore, the 2017 short-term cash incentive program still2019 STIP allows the Compensation Committee the flexibility to adjust the awardawards if necessary based on individual performance and any relevant market adjustments.


The quantitative performance metrics utilized in 2017,2019, which in the aggregate were weighted 75%80% of the total annual incentive opportunity, included both financial (40%(45% of the overall program)2019 STIP) and operational (35% of the overall program)2019 STIP) performance goals.

All of the goals excluded the impacts associated with any of the Company’s unrestricted subsidiaries, such as Elevation Midstream, LLC, and the impact of any long-term incentive awards that are settled in cash.


The financial goals included:


Net debt at December 31, 2017,Free Cash Flow, calculated as the Company’s 2019 cash flow from operations plus cash flow from investments as presented in the Company’s audited financial statements (“Free Cash Flow Metric”); and

19




Return on Invested Capital, which is the Company’s Adjusted EBITDAX for 2019, as disclosed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, divided by the Company's last six months of EBITDAX, annualized ("Net Debt Metric"Company’s average gross cash invested (“ROIC Metric”);.


Ratio of field-level cash operating margin per barrel of oil equivalent ("BOE"), before general and administrative expenses and inclusive of hedges, divided by the Company's finding and development cost per BOE ("Cash Recycle Metric"); and

Total internal rate of return for all the wells brought online during the year, measured on actual capital spent on drilling, completion and facilities against net revenue ("Rate of Return Metric").

The operational goals included:


Proved Developed Reserves growth per share,Growth, calculated as year-end 20172019 proved developed reserves divided by year-end 20162018 proved developed reserves ("(“Reserve Growth Metric"Metric”);


Production growth per share,Growth, calculated as production for 20172019 divided by production for 2016 ("2018, in each case measured by BOE (“Production Growth Metric"Metric”);

Net Cash G&A, calculated as annual cash G&A less any cash reimbursements (“Cash G&A Metric”); and


Lease Operating cost per BOE produced, calculated as the sum of net cash general and administrative expense and direct operating costs (excludingExpenses, which excludes surface rental fees, transportation, and marketing expense and production taxes), divided by annual production as measured in BOE ("taxes (“Operating Cost Metric"Metric”).


The qualitative metrics that the Compensation Committee established (25%that 20% of the overall program) were2019 STIP would be associated with the execution on the Company’s strategic in nature and included:

    Development and Board approval of a five-year business plan ("Long-Term Plan Metric");goals.


Development of an organizational plan to provide growth for the Company, including business performance processes and the attraction and retention of employees ("Organizational Metric");

Development of more robust health, safety & environmental processes ("HSE Metric"); and

Table of Contents

    Community development initiatives ("Community Development Metric").

The chart below summarizes the metrics and performance levels established by the Compensation Committee for 2017.

2019.


WEIGHTINGTHRESHOLD
PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
TARGET
PERFORMANCE
LEVEL
MAXIMUM
PERFORMANCE
LEVEL

Quantitative Metrics—75% Aggregate Weighting

Financial

WEIGHTINGTHRESHOLD PERFORMANCE LEVELTARGET PERFORMANCE LEVELMAXIMUM PERFORMANCE LEVEL

Net Debt Metric

Quantitative Metrics—80% Aggregate Weighting
16%2.00
Payout 8%
1.50
Payout 16%
1.25
Payout 32%


Cash Recycle Metric

Financial

12%

1.75
Payout 6%

2.00
Payout 12%

2.25
Payout 24%


Rate of ReturnFree Cash Flow Metric

12%

25%

20%($10 million)
Payout 6%

12.5%

$0
Payout 25%

$25 million
Payout 50%
ROIC Metric
20%23%
Payout 10%
25%
Payout 12%

20%

30%27%
Payout 24%

40%

Operational

Reserve Growth Metric

10.5%10%10.0%12%
Payout 5.25%5%
12.5%16.5%
Payout 10.5%10%
15.0%20%
Payout 21%20%


Production Growth Metric

12.25%

15%

60%15%
Payout 6.125%

7.5%

67%19%
Payout 12.25%

15%

74%23%
Payout 24.5%

30%


Cash G&A Metric

5%$71.5 million
Payout 2.5%
$65 million
Payout 5%
$58.5 million
Payout 10%
Operating Cost Metric

12.25%

5%

$6.25104.5 million
Payout 6.125%

2.5%

$5.7595 million
Payout 12.25%

5%

$5.2585.5 million
Payout 24.5%

10%

Qualitative Factors—25%20% Aggregate Weighting

Long-Term Plan MetricStrategic Goals

6.25%20%Determined at Compensation Committee’s discretion based on execution of strategic goals

Organizational Metric

6.25%The payout percentages for qualitative metrics
are determined by the Compensation Committee
in its discretion after considering the Company's
qualitative performance in the listed areas and
any other areas it deems important for the year.

HSE Metric

6.25%

Community Development Metric

6.25%


After the level of performance is determined, the payout percentage for each individual metric is added together to calculate the total payout percentage for each Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee may then further adjust the total payout percentage for each participantNamed Executive Officer either up or down to take into account individual performance.performance or for other factors. The final payout percentage is then multiplied by the participant'sparticipant’s target bonus opportunity. For 2017,2019, the target bonus opportunities for our Named Executive Officers, as a percentage of their base salaries at year-end, were 150% for Mr. Erickson, 100% for Messrs. Owens and Kelley, and 60%75% for Messrs. Brock and Christ.

GRAPHIC


Table As Ms. Foschi was only designated an executive officer of Contentsthe Company in 2019, she participated in the bonus program established for non-executive employees.


20




image3.jpg

In February 2018,March 2020, the Compensation Committee met to determine the payout percentage for each metric based on the actual level of performance achieved for each of the qualitative and quantitative performance factors. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the data regarding the Company'sCompany’s performance as compared to the targets for each quantitative performance metric established for 2019.

In the 2016 fiscal year. Thethird quarter of 2019, the Board amended the Company’s capital budget to execute upon a more measured pace of development to focus on generating free cash flow and to deemphasize the Company’s production growth. While the 2019 STIP would have allowed the Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretionthe ability to adjust the total payout percentage based on individual performance.

metrics in the program to account for the revised budget, due to the negative stock price performance of the Company during 2019, the Compensation Committee elected not to adjust the impacted metrics.


The Compensation Committee calculated the payout percentage for the financial quantitative metrics of 32.5%17.7% and the operational quantitative metrics of 60.3%34.6% by applying the actual results for each quantitative metric for the 2017 fiscal year2019 to the targets approved by the Compensation Committee.


With respect to the financial quantitative metrics, the Company failed to achieveachieved performance (i) below the threshold performance level for the Net DebtFree Cash Flow Metric, resulting in a 0%no payout percentage for that metric but achieved performance betweenand (ii) slightly under the target and maximum levelslevel for the Cash Recycle and Rate of Return Metrics,ROIC Metric, resulting in a payout percentage of 13.3% and 19.2%, respectively,17.7% for those measures.

that measure.


With respect to the operational quantitative metrics, the Company achieved performance (i) at the maximum performancethreshold level for the Reserve Growth Metric, resulting in a 21%5% payout percentage for that measure, and achieved performance(ii) between the target and maximum levels for the Production Growth and Operating Cost Metrics,Metric, resulting in a payout percentage of 22.2%15.2% for that measure, (iii) between the threshold and 17.1%, respectively,target levels for those measures.

the Operating Cost Metric, resulting in a payout percentage of 4.4% for that measure, and (iv) at the maximum level for the Cash G&A Metric, resulting in a payout percentage of 10% for that measure.


With respect to the qualitative metrics, the Compensation Committee considered a variety of qualitative factors, including leadership through a transition of management, support of business development activities, provision of strategic and tactical advice to the Board, commitment to ethics and integrity and driving a culture of compliance, and successful development and management of external partnerships, in determining a payout percentage of 40.7%. The Compensation Committee acknowledged the Company's successes as follows:

    For the Long-Term Plan Metric, management developed a five-year plan that balanced growth0% for Mr. Erickson, 30% for Mr. Owens, 40% for Mr. Christ, and balance sheet strength and a development strategy20% for the Company's entire acreage position. Management also established a dedicated planning group and implemented new modeling software.Mr. Brock.


For the Organizational Metric, the Company made significant progress on increasing organizational capacity to manage the Company's increased level of operations, implemented internal controls and testing, and had high rates of both workplace satisfaction and retention rates.

For the HSE Metric, the Company had zero recordable incidents for the Company's employees and improved key safety processes, which was a focus for management throughout the year.

For the Community Development Metric, with the agreements the Company entered into during the year with municipalities, the Company set a high bar for other operators in the DJ Basin when it comes to working with local governments to avoid costly litigation and associated delays.

Table of Contents

The following chart shows the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s determination with respect to the 2017 short-term cash incentive program2019 STIP performance measures:


Quantitative Metrics

MetricThresholdTargetMaximumActual ResultPayout Percentage
Financial
Free Cash Flow($10 million)$0$25 million($69 million)0.0%
ROIC23%25%27%24.5%17.7%
Operational
Reserve Growth12%16.5%20%12%5.0%
Production Growth15%19%23%19.1%15.2%
Operating Cost$ 104.5 million$ 95 million$ 85.5 million$ 97.2 million4.4%
Cash G&A$ 71.5 million$ 65 million$ 58.5 million$ 49.3 million10.0%


21




Metric
 Threshold Target Maximum Actual
Result
 Payout
Percentage
 

Financial

                

Net Debt Ratio

  2.00  1.50  1.25  2.01  0%

Cash Recycle Ratio

  1.75  2.00  2.25  2.03  13.3%

Rate of Return for Drilling & Completion

  20% 25% 30% 28% 19.2%

Operational

                

Reserve Growth per Share

  10.0% 12.5% 15.0% 17.2% 21.0%

Production Growth per Share

  60% 67% 74% 72.7% 22.2%

Operating Cost per Boe

 $6.25 $5.75 $5.25 $5.55  17.1%
Qualitative Metrics
MetricMinimumTargetMaximumPayout Percentage
Execution on Strategic Goals
Mark A. Erickson0%20%40%0%
Matthew R. Owens0%20%40%30%
Eric J. Christ0%20%40%40%
Tom L. Brock0%20%40%20%

Metric
ThresholdTargetMaximumActual
Result
Payout
Percentage
Qualitative Metrics

Long-Term Plan

Organizational Development

The payout percentage for40.7%

Health, Safety & Environmental

qualitative metrics is

Community Development

determined by the
Compensation Committee in its
discretion after considering the
Company's qualitative
performance in the listed areas
and any other areas it deems
important for the year.

TOTAL 2017 PAYOUT PERCENTAGE

133.5%

        The final payout percentage of 133.5%, as determined above, was then multiplied by the Named Executive Officer's target bonus opportunity in order to calculate the total bonus payable to each Named Executive Officer. The bonus amount paid to each Named Executive Officer for the 2017 fiscal year under the 2017 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program2019 STIP are outlined in the chart below and are reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation"Compensation” column:


Name
 Base Salary
as of 12/31/17
  
 Target Bonus
as % of
Base Salary
  
 Payout
Percentage
  
 Individual
Performance
Adjustments
  
 Actual 2017
Bonus Award
 NameBase Salary as of 12/31/19Target Bonus as % of Base SalaryPayout Percentage2019 STIP Award

Mark A. Erickson

 $500,000 X 150%X 133.5%+ 0 = $1,001,082 Mark A. Erickson$ 500,000X150%X52%=$390,000

Matthew R. Owens

 $450,000 X 100%X 133.5%+ 0 = $600,649 Matthew R. Owens$ 450,000X100%X82%=$369,000

Russell T. Kelley, Jr.

 $450,000 X 100%X 133.5%+ 0 = $600,649 

Tom L. Brock

 $310,000 X 60%X 133.5%+ 0 = $248,268 Tom L. Brock$ 345,050X75%X72%=$186,300

Eric J. Christ

 $310,000 X 60%X 133.5%+ 0 = $248,268 Eric J. Christ$ 345,050X75%X92%=$238,050


2017
2019 Awards Underunder the LTIP

        In connection with the closing of our IPO, our Board of Directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the

Our stockholder-approved LTIP is intended to attract, retain, and motivate our employees, directors, and other service providers.consultants. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the LTIP, which provides for the grant of


Table of Contents

cash- cash and equity-based awards, including options to purchase shares of our Common Stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"(“RSUs”), bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards, performance awards and annual incentive awards. Since the adoption of our LTIP, we have awarded onlytime-vesting RSUs, performance-vesting restricted stock awards (“PSAs”), performance-vesting RSUs (“PSUs”), and stock options and PSAs pursuant to our LTIP.

under the Plan.

2017
2019 Restricted Stock Unit AwardsUnits and Performance Stock Units under the LTIP

In March 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee granted time-vesting RSUs and performance-vesting PSUs to Messrs. Brock and Christ. The RSUs granted will be settled in shares of our Common Stock and will vest, subject to continued employment with us and the terms of the RSU award agreement and the LTIP, in accordance with the following schedule: 12.5% on September 15, 2017, March 15, 2018, September 15, 2018 and March 15, 2019, and 25% on September 15, 2019 and March 15, 2020. The RSUs are intended to emphasize retention and stock ownership and serve as a more fixed and predictable compensation element, and to further align our Named Executive Officer's compensation with the interests of our stockholders.

2017 Performance Stock Awards and Stock Options under the LTIP

        In October 2017, the Compensation Committee granted PSAs and stock option awards to eachcertain of our Named Executive Officers. For Messrs. Erickson, Owens, and Kelley, 75% of the targeted award value was issued in PSUs and 25% of the targeted award value was issued in RSUs. For Messrs. Brock and Christ, 50% of the targeted award value was issued in PSUs and 50% of the targeted award value was issued in RSUs. For Ms. Foschi, 38% of her targeted award was issued in RSUs and 62% of her targeted award was issued in time-vesting restricted cash, which was granted to her before she was designated as an executive officer, and which vests 25% on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to her continued service. With respect to the PSUs issued, a portion were issued such that they would be settled in our Common Stock and a portion were issued such that they would be settled in cash. The Compensation Committee designed this to mitigate potentially extensive dilution to our Common Stock given the decline the Company’s stock price.


The Compensation Committee determined to award athe above mix of PSAs and stock options due to the different incentives and characteristics of each type of awards. Specifically, PSAs are intendedawards granted in 2019 would help to ensure that a meaningful portion of our Named Executive Officers'Officers’ compensation is performance-based and variable based on the performance of our stock price, including stock price relative to our peers, as well as the Company’s return on capital invested, thus incentivizing our Named Executive Officers to achieve long-term companyCompany performance goals and superior operational execution. Stock options are intended to emphasize retention and stock ownership and serve as a more fixed and predictable compensation element over a longer time horizon, and to further align our Named Executive Officer's compensation with the interests of our stockholders. In short, the combination of PSAs and stock options are intended to balance performance-based compensation with the need to retain critical talent.


The stock optionsRSUs granted to the Named Executive Officers in October 2017 willApril 2019 are scheduled to vest, subject to continued employment with us and the terms of the stock option agreement and the LTIP, in equal amounts on December 31, 2017, 2018April 1, 2020, 2021 and 2019. 2022.

For the PSAs,2019 PSUs, the performance metric ismetrics are (i) relative total stockholder return, which measures the Company'sCompany’s total stockholder return as compared to the total stockholder return of fifteen15 peer group companies (“RTSR”), (ii) absolute total stockholder return, which provides for payout of such PSUs only in the event of
22




positive stockholder return (“ATSR”), and (iii) return on capital invested (“ROIC”), in each case measured over the performance period from January 1, 2017,2019 through December 31, 2019.2021. The Compensation Committee determined that relative total stockholder return was anthese metrics were appropriate performance measuremeasures over the performance period because it alignsthey are intended to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of stockholders. In addition, due to the sustained volatility in commodity prices, the Compensation Committee felt that the PSAsPSUs should also partially vest based on performance relative to peers in our industry.


At the end of the performance period, the PSAs2019 PSUs will vest based on the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s certification of the Company's relative total stockholder returnCompany’s RTSR, ATSR, and ROIC for the performance period. Following such certification of performance, the PSAs2019 PSUs will vest as follows:


Level
 Performance
(Percentile Rank vs.
Peers)
 Payout
(% of Target)
 % of Granted
PSAs to Vest
 

Less than Threshold

 < 30th Percentile  0% 0%

Threshold

 30th Percentile  50% 25%

Target

 55th Percentile  100% 50%

Maximum

 80th Percentile  200% 100%
Relative Total Stockholder Return (RTSR):

        The PSAs

LevelPerformance (Percentile Rank vs. Peers)Payout (% of Target)% of Granted PSUs to Vest
Less than Threshold
< 30th Percentile
0%0%
Threshold
30th Percentile
50%15%
Target
55th Percentile
100%30%
Maximum
80th Percentile
200%60%

Absolute Total Stockholder Return (ATSR):
LevelYearly Average ATSRPayout (% of Target)% of Granted PSUs to Vest
Less than Threshold< 5%0%0%
Threshold5%50%15%
Target10%100%30%
Maximum15% or more200%60%

Return on Capital Invested (ROIC):
LevelYearly Average ROICPayout (% of Target)% of Granted PSUs to Vest
Less than Threshold< 18%0%0%
Threshold18%50%20%
Target20.5%100%40%
Maximum23% or more200%80%

A portion of the 2019 PSUs will be forfeited entirely if the Company does not achieve at least the threshold level of relative total stockholder return performance.RTSR, ATSR, and ROIC with respect to that portion. In the event that target performance is achieved 50%for a particular metric, 100% of


Table of Contents

the number of PSAsPSUs granted associated with that metric will be forfeited. Additionally, if the Company's absolute shareholder return over the performance period is negative, no more than the 50% of the granted PSAs will vest. Only inearned. In the event that (i) maximum performance is achieved and (ii) absolute shareholder return is positive will allon each of the PSAsthree metrics, 200% of the 2019 PSUs granted bewill become vested. Payout levels for performance between threshold, target, and maximum shallfor a metric will be calculated using straight line interpolation.



23




Other Compensation Elements

We have historically offered participation in broad-based retirement and health and welfare plans to all of our employees.employees, including our Named Executive Officers. We currently maintain a retirement plan intended to provide benefits under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the “Tax Code”) where employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are allowed to contribute portions of their base compensation to a tax-qualified retirement account. We provide matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 6% of employees'employees’ eligible compensation contributed to the plan. We also pay the premiums for life insurance coverage of $100,000 for each of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers on a non-discriminatory basis.


We have not in the past maintained, and do not currently maintain aor plan to maintain, any defined benefit pension planplans or nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

plans.


In addition, minimal perquisites have historically been provided to our Named Executive Officers, namely, with respect to Messrs. Owens and Kelley, a vehicle allowance. We expectIn February 2020, the Company ceased providing vehicle allowances for employees that each of these benefits will continue to be provided.


do not regularly work in field operations, such as our Named Executive Officers.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

        We

Historically, we have entered into employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers. However, in 2019 the Compensation Committee began to design, and in 2020 the Company adopted, an Executive Severance Plan covering certain designated officers, including Messrs. Brock and Christ and Ms. Foschi. Upon entering into participation agreements under the Executive Severance Plan, the employment agreements between the Company and Messrs. Brock and Christ were terminated. Mr. Owens continues to have an employment agreement with the Company and Mr. Tyree, the Company’s Executive Chairman, entered into an employment agreement when he joined the Company in March 2020.

The Compensation Committee has determined that having employment agreements with these executive officersMr. Owens and Mr. Tyree is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Many of the companies with which we compete for executive talent provide similarly situated executives with employment agreements and, as such, the agreements are an important recruiting and retention tool. We believe that the current executive officers have been integral to our success and are vital to the continuing performance of the Company. We believe that the terms of the employment agreements are fair to the Company and that the compensation under the employment agreements is competitive relative to our peer companies while not being excessive. For a description of the terms of the employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers, please see the section below entitled "Narrative“Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table."


POST-EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

All of theour Named Executive Officers either have employment agreements with usor are participants under our Executive Severance Plan that provide for compensatory payments and benefits upon certain termination events, including a termination event in connection with a change in control. In addition, certain awards pursuant to our LTIP provide for termination and change in control payments.protection. For a discussion regarding the mechanics and amounts of these payments, please see the "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control"Control” discussion below. We do not have any single-trigger arrangements (i.e., arrangements that provide for payments to executives solely upon a change in control). In exchange for the severance benefits afforded to our Named Executive Officers in their employment agreements, the Named Executive Officers must execute (and not revoke) a general release and, in addition, are subject to certain ongoing obligations that accrue to the benefit of the Company, including certain confidentiality, non-competition, and non-solicitation obligations.


We provide these post-employment arrangements in order to retain our Named Executive Officers and to allow them to focus on enhancing the value of the Company without taking into account the personal impact of their business decisions. Our post-employment arrangements are intended to allow our Named


Table of Contents

Executive Officers to objectively manage the Company and provide a competitive benefit for attracting and retaining executives.



24




TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS

The Compensation Committee and the Company review and consider the tax, accounting, and securities law implications of our compensation programs.


Section 162(m). When setting executive compensation, we consider many factors, such as attracting and retaining executives and providing appropriate performance incentives. We also consider the after-tax cost to the Company in establishing executive compensation programs, both individually and in the aggregate, but tax deductibility is not our sole consideration. Section 162(m) of the Tax Code prohibits deductionsgenerally disallows a federal income tax deduction to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million (per individual) paid to their chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (as well as certain other officers who were covered employees in years after 2016). The 2017 Tax Act eliminated most of the exceptions from the $1 million deduction limit, except for certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. As a result, most of the compensation payable to our Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million duringper person in a single fiscal year to certain executive officers. Prior to implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"), there was an exception to this prohibition for performance-based awards (as that term is defined in the Code), which exception (the "Performance-Based Exception") will continue with respect to compensation paid pursuant to certain written contracts in effect on November 2, 2017. We take the economic effects of Code Section 162(m) into consideration when determining the structure, implementation, and amount of awards paid to our executive officers, including the deductibility of our executive compensation programs. Prior to the implementation of the Tax Act, awards granted under our LTIP, including our annual cash bonuses and equity awards, were generally structured to not be subject to Code Section 162(m), but the elimination of the Performance-Based Exception will greatly reduce out flexibility in this regard. Accordingly, we reserve the right to pay non-deductible compensation to our executive officers.fully deductible.


Accounting for Executive Compensation. Currently, we account for all equity-based compensation is accounted for under the rules of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 ("(“FASB ASC Topic 718"718”). This rule requires us to estimate the expense of each equity award over the vesting period of the award and record it as such. We are also obligated to record cash-based awards as an expense at the time our payment obligation is accrued.


RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION

The Compensation Committee has reviewed our executive and non-executive compensation programs and believes that they do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. We believe that any risk inherent in our compensation programs is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on us. In designing and implementing our award structure, we worked closely with FW Cook to mitigate any risks and to design the program to minimize the creation of imprudent incentives for our executives. We believe that our performance-based compensation does not encourage unnecessary risks because the executive pay mix is sufficiently diversified over several performance metrics as well as over short-term and long-term compensation.


Our compensation program structure and policy includes the following features that are intended to prevent and safeguard against excessive risk-taking:


Payments under our short-term cash incentive programSTIP are based upon the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s certification and review of a variety of performance metrics, thereby diversifyingwhich is intended to diversify the risk associated with any single performance indicator;


Our long-term equity compensation rewardsLTIP awards for executive officers generally have performance or vesting periods of at least three years, which encouragesis intended to encourage executives to focus on sustaining the performance of the Company and its stock price;


WeOur goal is to pay compensation that is competitive with the market and our industry peers, while not being excessive;


Our compensation mix is intended to be balanced among fixed and variable components, annual and long-term compensation, and cash- and equity-based awards that reward performance in the Company'sCompany’s and executive'sexecutive’s long-term best interests;

    Table of Contents

      Our incentive compensation plans cap the maximum payout and implement design features that do not encourageare intended to discourage excessive risk-taking;


    OurThe Compensation Committee has an appropriate level of discretion to reduce payments under the short-term cash incentive program;STIP;


    Our insider trading policy contains a general anti-hedging and, subject to limited exceptions with Audit Committee approval, anti-pledging policy for all insiders; and

    25




    We do not have any agreements that provide for payments solely upon the occurrence of a change in control.

            We believe that our executive compensation program provides our executive officers with appropriate rewards for sustained performance without giving unnecessary weight to any one factor or type of compensation and avoiding excessive risk. Our structure is designed to encourage continual superior performance. Based on the foregoing, the Compensation Committee has concluded that the risks arising from our compensation policies and programs is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.


    Recoupment of Compensation

    Our LTIP and all of our Named Executive Officers' employment agreements entered into with Messrs. Tyree and Owens are subject to deductions and clawbacks that may be required to be made pursuant to any law, government regulation, or stock exchange listing requirement or by any policy adopted by us. To date, the Board has not adopted a formal clawback policy to recoup incentive-based compensation upon the occurrence of a financial restatement, misconduct, or other specified events. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates that the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reimburse the Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation paid to them in a year following the issuance of financial statements that are later required to be restated as a result of misconduct. In addition, Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") requires the SEC to direct national securities exchanges to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that fails to develop and implement a clawback policy. The Compensation Committee is reviewing the SEC's proposed rules on incentive compensation clawbacks pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and evaluating the practical, administrative and other implications of adopting, implementing and enforcing a clawback policy, and intends to implement a more specific clawback policy once the SEC's rules are finalized.


    Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

    The Company maintains an insider trading policy that prohibits trading shares of our common stockCommon Stock when in possession of material non-public information. It also prohibits the hedging and, unless a waiver is obtained from our Audit Committee, the pledging of our shares. Since the adoption of our insider trading policy at the time of our initial public offering, the Audit Committee has not granted any waivers to the policy'spolicy’s general prohibition on pledging.


    Stock Ownership Guidelines

            Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, in March 2018 the Board adopted

    We maintain stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors and executives, including our Named Executive Officers. The details of the stock ownership guidelines applicable to our Named Executive Officers are outlined below. For information regarding the stock ownership guidelines


    Table of Contents

    applicable to our non-employee directors, please see the section of this Proxy Statement below entitled "Director“Director Stock Ownership Guidelines."


    FeatureExecutives
    Structure and AmountChief Executive Officer—5X Annual Base Salary
    President and CFO—3X Annual Base Salary
    Senior Vice Presidents—2X Annual Base Salary
    Vice Presidents—1.5X Annual Base Salary

    Shares that Count Towards Requirements

    Vested and unvested RSUs

    Shares purchased in the open market

    Shares beneficially owned within the immediate family


    Time Period to Meet Compliance


    No set time period, but cannot sell stock until requirements are satisfied, other than (i) shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations and (ii) shares disposed to satisfy the exercise price of Company stock options.


    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS SINCE FISCAL YEAR-END

    2018 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program

            The 2018 short-term cash incentive program is structured in a similar way as the 2017 short-term cash incentive program. In February 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that the metrics for the 2018 short-term cash incentive program be revised as follows:

      The Cash Recycle Ratio metric was removed and replaced with a metric measuring the Company's progress toward generating free cash flow; and

    26


    The financial quantitative metrics were increased from 40% to 50% of the overall program, while the operational quantitative metrics were decreased from 35% to 30% and the strategic qualitative metrics were decreased from 25% to 20% of the overall program, respectively.

    2018 Performance Stock Awards under the LTIP

            On March 1, 2018, the Compensation Committee granted PSAs under the LTIP to each of our Named Executive Officers. The PSAs granted have a three-year performance period and vest based on (i) relative total stockholder return (30%), (ii) absolute total shareholder return (30%) and (iii) cash returned on capital invested (40%). Threshold performance must be achieved before any payout occurs, and the maximum payout is capped at 200% of the target award amount, or 100% of the number of the PSAs granted. The Compensation Committee, with input from FW Cook, determined that the peer group for the 2018 PSAs should be updated and added WildHorse Resource Development Corp. to the peer group. Consistent with Item 402 of Regulation S-K, additional information regarding these decisions will be discussed in the Proxy Statement for the fiscal year 2018.


    2017
    2019 Summary Compensation Table

    The following table summarizes the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended December 31,2019. Compensation information for 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015.

            During the years prior to the completion of the IPO,is presented for individuals who were also our Named Executive Officers performed services both for us and for other business segments operated by Holdings, and the aggregate compensation paid toin those Named Executive Officers has been in recognition of all services provided. Since 2016, 100% of the services of our Named Executive Officers have been allocated to us. For 2015,


    Table of Contents

    the amounts set forth in the table below reflect only the portion of such aggregate compensation received by the Named Executive Officers relating to services provided to us. This portion of aggregate compensation was estimated as 76% for Mr. Erickson, 84% for Mr. Owens, and 88% for Mr. Kelley. For 2016 and 2017, the amounts set forth reflect 100% of compensation received by the Named Executive Officers.

    years.
    Name and Principal Position
     Year Salary
    ($)
     Bonus
    ($)
     Stock
    Awards(1)
    ($)
     Option
    Awards(2)
    ($)
     Non-equity
    Incentive Plan
    Compensation(3)
    ($)
     All Other
    Compensation(4)
    ($)
     Total
    ($)
     

    Mark Erickson

      2017  462,500    2,672,399  2,339,326  1,001,082  90,542  6,565,849 

    (Chief Executive Officer)

      2016  417,339  1,012,500  14,891,303  10,125,000       26,446,142 

      2015  228,750  381,250           610,000 

    Matthew R. Owens

      2017  450,000    1,305,127  1,142,462  600,649  12,000  3,510,238 

    (President)

      2016  417,339  900,000  14,891,303  10,125,000     12,000  26,345,642 

      2015  251,250  418,750         10,050  680,050 

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr. 

      2017  450,000    1,305,127  1,142,462  600,649  12,000  3,510,238 

    (Chief Financial Officer)

      2016  417,339  900,000  11,426,600  10,125,000     12,000  22,880,939 

      2015  264,000  440,000         10,560  714,560 

    Tom L. Brock. 

      2017  302,500    1,568,390  544,030  248,268  18,000  2,681,188 

    (Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer)

                             

    Eric J. Christ. 

      2017  302,500    1,588,574  544,030  248,268  18,000  2,701,372 

    (Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary)

                             

    Name and Principal PositionYearSalary ($)Bonus ($)Stock Awards(1) ($)Option Awards(3) ($)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4) ($)All Other Compensation (5) ($)Total ($)
    Matthew R. Owens (President and Chief Executive Officer)2019450,0002,283,845369,00031,4003,134,245
    2018450,0001,469,657500,00028,5002,448,157
    2017450,0001,305,1271,142,462600,64912,0003,510,238
    Tom L. Brock (Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer)2019345,0501,048,438186,30016,8001,596,588
    2018335,000699,836335,00016,5001,386,336
    2017302,5001,568,390544,030248,26818,0002,681,188
    Eric J. Christ (Vice President, General Counsel & Corp. Secretary)2019345,0501,048,438238,05019,9501,651,488
    2018335,0001,413,836335,00016,5002,100,336
    2017302,5001,588,574544,030248,26818,0002,701,372
    Marianella Foschi (Vice President of Finance)2019300,000151,472(2)210,00016,800678,272
    Mark Erickson (Former Chief Executive Officer)2019500,0004,676,442390,00016,8005,583,242
    2018500,0003,009,286750,00088,5004,347,786
    2017462,5002,672,3992,339,3261,001,08290,5426,565,849
    Russell T. Kelley, Jr. (Former Chief Financial Officer)2019318,7502,283,845165,7501,508,9874,277,332
    2018450,0001,469,657500,00012,0002,431,657
    2017450,0001,305,1271,142,462600,64912,0003,510,238
    ___________________________
    (1)
    Amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all stock awards granted during the indicated fiscal year determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 ("FASB ASC Topic 718"),718, disregarding estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value of each RSUtime-vesting restricted stock unit (“RSU”), performance-vesting restricted stock award (“PSA”), and performance-vesting restricted stock unit (“PSU”) is measured based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on the date of grant. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized or that may be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.

    For 2016, for (i) restricted unit awards (RUAs) granted under the Holdings 2014 Membership Unit Incentive Plan, the amounts shown are based on the grant date fair value of an RUA on September 23, 2016, the date of grant, which was $5.84 and (ii) RSUs granted under the LTIP, the amounts shown are based on the closing price of our common stock on October 17, 2016, which was $21.51. All RUAs were directly or indirectly converted into Common Stock in connection with our IPO and, as such, no RUAs are currently outstanding.

    For 2017, the amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs, if any, and PSAs granted to our Named Executive Officers. For additional information regarding the assumptions underlying this calculation, please see "Note 11—Unit and “Note 12—Stock-Based Compensation"Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K relating to fiscal year 20172019 for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the value of these awards. See the section of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis above entitled "2017“2019 Awards under the LTIP"LTIP” above and the "Grants“Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table"Table” below for additional information regarding these awards.

    (2)
    Ms. Foschi also received a restricted cash award on April 5, 2019 in the amount of $248,528, which will vest, subject to continued employment with us, in amounts of 25% on April 1, 2020 and 2021, and 50% on April 1, 2022.
    (3)Amounts in this column do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the executive.Named Executive Officer. See "Note 11—Unit and “Note 12—Stock-Based Compensation"Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K relating to fiscal year 20162019 for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the value of these awards and for a description of their accounting treatment under FASB ASC Topic 718, including the liability treatment of the incentive units granted in 2015.

    718. For 2017, and 2016, this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of nonstatutory stock option awards granted during the year under the LTIP, calculated based on a per option value of $8.66, for 2017 and a per option value of $6.75 for 2016, as determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the Black-Scholes options pricing model.

    For 2015, the three Named Executive Officers, Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley received a grant of

    (4)Represents amounts earned under our STIP, which is an annual incentive units (described below) under the Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Holdings (the "Holdings LLC Agreement"). We believeplan that despite the fact that incentive units do not require the payment of an exercise price, they are most similar economically to stock options, and as such they are properly classified as "options" under the definition provided in Item 402(a)(6)(i) of Regulation S-K as an instrument with an "option-like feature." Amounts reported in this column reflect a grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of $0. Because the performance conditions related to these awards were not deemed probable at the time of grant in 2015, no amounts have been reported in 2015 for purposes of this table. These awards do not have maximum payout levels.

    (3)
    Amounts in this column represent the annual cash bonus awarded under the short-term cash incentive program for the indicated fiscal year.

    Table of Contents

      In 2017, the Company implemented a new short-term cash incentive program. This new bonus program is intended to incentivize our Named Executive Officers to achieve specific goals over the course of the year. As such, amounts earned under this program in 2017 are reported inSee the "Non-Equitysection of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis above entitled “Annual Incentive Plan Compensation" column rather thanBonus—2019 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program (STIP)” for additional information regarding the "Bonus" column.

    (4)
    2019 STIP.
    (5)For 2017,2019, amounts reported in the "All“All Other Compensation"Compensation” column include Company contributions to the Named Executive Officers'Officers’ 401(k) plan retirement accounts, and a travel allowance or commuting reimbursementexecutive physical exams provided to certain of our Named Executive Officers, as shown in the following table.

    27




    Name
     401(k) Plan
    Company Matching
    Contributions
     Travel
    Allowance
     Commuting
    Reimbursement
     Total Name401(k) Plan Company Matching ContributionsCar AllowanceExecutive PhysicalTotal

    Mark A. Erickson

     $18,542  $72,000 $90,542 

    Matthew R. Owens

      $12,000  $12,000 Matthew R. Owens$16,800  $12,000  $2,600  $31,400  

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr

      $12,000  $12,000 

    Tom L. Brock

     $18,000   $18,000 Tom L. Brock$16,800  $—  $—  $16,800  

    Eric J. Christ

     $18,000   $18,000 Eric J. Christ$16,800  $—  $3,150  $19,950  
    Marianella FoschiMarianella Foschi$16,800  $—  $—  $16,800  
    Mark A. EricksonMark A. Erickson$16,800  $—  $—  $16,800  
    Russell T. Kelley, JrRussell T. Kelley, Jr$—  $8,500  $—  $ 1,508,987(1) 

    ___________________________
    (1) Mr. Kelley departed from the Company on September 4, 2019. Amounts paid in 2019 also include severance payments of $1,500,487.

    Realized Compensation

    The calculation of total compensation, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 27, includes items driven by accounting assumptions as defined by the SEC. As a result, total compensation as defined by the SEC differs substantially from the compensation actually realized by our Named Executive Officers in a particular year. To supplement the SEC-required disclosure, the table below shows compensation actually realized by the Named Executive Officers that were employed by the Company for all of calendar year 2019. These amounts are not a substitute for the amounts reported under the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table above. Realized compensation includes the Named Executive Officer’s earned salary, earned STIP award, value realized on vesting and settlement of stock awards, value realized on exercise of stock options, and amount under the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table above.

    The following table summarizes, with respect to our Named Executive Officers that were employed by the Company for all of calendar year 2019, information relating to the realized compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities during 2019 and the amounts earned by those individuals that were also our Named Executive Officers in 2018 and 2017.
    NameRealized Compensation
    201920182017
    Matthew R. Owens$1,430,400  $2,313,250  $3,055,149  
    Tom L. Brock$771,854  $1,219,071  $1,178,254  
    Eric J. Christ$802,689  $979,505  $950,064  
    Marianella Foschi$764,738  N/A  N/A  
    Mark A. Erickson$1,486,800  $2,691,792  $3,546,624  

    Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    The table below includes information about awards granted to our Named Executive Officers during 20172019 under our LTIP.

     
      
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Non-Equity Incentive
    Plan Awards(1)
     Estimated Future Payouts
    Under Equity Incentive Plan
    Awards(2)
     All Other
    Stock
    Awards
     All Other
    Option Awards
      
     Grant Date Fair
    Value of Stock
    and Option
    Awards
     
     
      
     Exercise Price
    of Option
    Awards
     
     
     Grant
    Date
     Threshold
    ($)
     Target
    ($)
     Maximum
    ($)
     Threshold
    (#)
     Target
    (#)
     Maximum
    (#)
     (# of
    Shares)
     (# of Securities
    Underlying
    Options)
     
    Name
     ($/Share) ($)(3) 

    Mark Erickson

         375,000  750,000  1,500,000                      

      10/4/2017           75,492  150,983  301,966           2,672,399 

      10/4/2017                       270,130  15.53  2,339,326 

    Matthew R. Owens

         225,000  450,000  900,000                      

      10/4/2017           36,868  73,736  147,472           1,305,127 

      10/4/2017                       131,924  15.53  1,142,462 

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.

         225,000  450,000  900,000                      

      10/4/2017           36,868  73,736  147,472           1,305,127 

      10/4/2017                       131,924  15.53  1,142,462 

    Tom L. Brock

         143,000  186,000  372,000                      

      3/15/2017                    56,296        946,889 

      10/4/2017           17,556  35,113  70,225           621,500 

      10/4/2017                       62,821  15.53  544,030 

    Eric J. Christ

         143,000  186,000  372,000                      

      3/15/2017                    57,496        967,074 

      10/4/2017           17,556  35,113  70,225           621,500 

      10/4/2017                       62,821  15.53  544,030 
    28




    Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)All Other Stock Awards(3)Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
    NameGrant DateThreshold ($)Target
    ($)
    Maximum ($)Threshold (#)Target
    (#)
    Maximum (#)(# of Shares)($)(4)
    Matthew R. Owens225,000450,000900,000
    4/5/201960,080120,160240,320771,427
    4/5/2019100,963201,926403,852987,418
    4/5/2019107,362525,000
    Tom L. Brock129,394258,787517,575
    4/5/201915,82931,65763,314203,238
    4/5/201935,29770,593141,186345,200
    4/5/2019102,249500,000
    Eric J. Christ129,394258,787517,575
    4/5/201915,82931,65763,314203,238
    4/5/201935,29770,593141,186345,200
    4/5/2019102,249500,000
    Marianella Foschi(5)4/5/201930,976151,472
    375,000750,0001,500,000
    Mark Erickson4/5/2019123,021246,042492,0841,579,590
    4/5/2019206,734413,467826,9342,021,854
    4/5/2019219,8361,074,998
    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.225,000450,000900,000
    4/5/201960,080120,160240,320771,427
    4/5/2019100,963201,926403,852987,418
    4/5/2019107,362525,000
    ___________________________
    (1)
    Amounts in these columns represent the threshold, target, and maximum estimated payouts for awards granted under our 2017 short-term cash incentive program.2019 STIP. The actual value of the bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers for 2017 under this programthe 2019 STIP can be found in the "Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation"Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.

    (2)
    Amounts in this column represent the number of PSAsPSUs granted in 20172019 that wouldare eligible to vest upon the achievement of a threshold (50%), target (100%), and maximum level(200%) levels of performance. The actual number of PSAsPSUs that will vest will not be determinable until the close of the three-year vesting period on December 31, 20192021, and will depend on our (i) relative TSR performance, over(ii) absolute TSR performance and (iii) return on capital invested during that period.

    (3)
    Amounts in this column represent the number of RSUs granted in 2019 that are scheduled to vest, subject to continued employment with us, in equal amounts on April 1, 2020, 2021, and 2022.
    (4)The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. For additional information regarding the assumptions underlying this calculation please see "Note 11—Unit and “Note 12—Stock-Based Compensation"Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K relating to fiscal year 20172019 for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the value of these awards and for a description of their accounting treatment under FASB ASC Topic 718.

    (5)Ms. Foschi also received a restricted cash award on April 5, 2019 in the amount of $248,528, which will vest, subject to continued employment with us, in amounts of 25% on April 1, 2020 and 2021, and 50% on April 1, 2022.

    Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

    Employment Agreements

            In connection with the IPO or shortly thereafter, our Named Executive Officers entered into employment agreements with us, (for Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley, effective as of October 11, 2016; for Mr. Brock, effective November 1, 2016; and for Mr. Christ, effective November 7, 2016) to reflect each executive's role with us going forward as a public company. Under these new employment agreements, each

    Each of our Named Executive Officers isother than Ms. Foschi was party to an employment agreement with us during 2019. Under their respective employment agreements, each executive was entitled to a certainspecified level of base salary,


    Table of Contents

    a minimum target annual bonus, and an expected minimum target annual performance-based equity grants,grant, as well as certain severance benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment. The employment agreements includeincluded customary restrictive covenants, including those precluding the executives from soliciting employees or competing with us for a period of up to two years following termination of employment. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, only Mr. Owens is still party to an employment agreement with us (as well as our new Executive Chairman, Mr. Tyree, who entered into an employment agreement with us in early 2020). The employment agreements with Messrs. Erickson and Kelley terminated in connection with their respective employment terminations. The employment agreements with Messrs. Brock and Mr. Christ were terminated in early

    29




    2020 when they became covered, along with Ms. Foschi, under our Executive Severance Plan. See "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control"Control” below for further details regarding the payments that our employment agreements provide the Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive upon a termination of employment or a change in control.


    Annual Bonus

            Prior to 2017, we maintained

    See “Annual Incentive Bonus—2019 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program (STIP)” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for a fully discretionary bonus program where, following the close of a fiscal year, our board determined the amount, if any, of the discretionary annual bonuses awarded to eachdescription of our Named Executive Officers after careful review of our performance over the course of the preceding fiscal year. Items that were taken into account during this subjective assessment included, but were not limited to, reserves growth, production growth, and our financial performance as measured by EBITDA. There were no performance metrics or formulas used to calculate the amounts of bonuses paid although the bonus guideline percentage of salary was considered in the board's determination.

            Following our IPO we reviewed and evaluated all of our compensation programs, including our short-term cashcurrent annual non-equity incentive program. During 2017, our Compensation Committee worked extensively with FW Cook, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, to design a new performance-based annual incentive program. The new annual incentive program, the 2017 short-term cash incentive program, measures company-wide performance based upon both quantitative and qualitative metrics. The 2017 short-term cash incentive program was implemented in order to provide pre-established objective performance criteria that could be communicated to our Named Executive Officers in order to motivate them to achieve specific short-term financial and operational goals. The 2017 short-term cash incentive program also provides for an established payout structure, with payout percentages that are calculated based upon actual performance as compared to quantitative and qualitative performance goals. The quantitative metrics allow the executives to strive towards very specific numerical performance goals, while the qualitative factors allow the Compensation Committee to evaluate more holistic company goals. Furthermore, the 2017 short-term cash incentive program still allows the Compensation Committee the flexibility to adjust the award if necessary based on individual performance and any relevant market adjustments.

    plan.


    Long-Term Incentive Compensation

    2016 Restricted Unit Awards

            Prior to our IPO, long-term incentives were historically granted to our Named Executive Officers through grants of restricted unit awards ("RUAs"), pursuant to the Holdings 2014 Membership UnitAmended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"). These equity-based awards were subject to time-based vesting requirements, as well as accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control. In 2016, our then Named Executive Officers were granted 1,531,542 RUAs (which consisted of 708,271 RUAs for each of Mr. Erickson and Mr. Owens, and 115,000 RUAs for Mr. Kelley) in connection with the IPO (the "2016 RUAs").

    Incentive Units

            In 2015, Holdings granted to each of the Named Executive Officers profits interests representing an interest in the future profits (once a certain level of proceeds had been generated) of Holdings and granted pursuant to the Holdings LLC Agreement (the "Incentive Units"). These Incentive Units represented interests in Holdings that had no value for tax purposes on the date of grant and were designed to gain value only after the underlying assets had realized a certain level of growth and return to those individuals who held certain classes of Holdings' equity. The Incentive Units were intended to provide the holders with the ability to benefit from the growth of Holdings, including the growth in our operations and business.


    Table of Contents

            The Incentive Units were divided into three tiers. A potential payout for each tier would occur only after a specified level of cumulative cash distributions had been received by members that had made capital contributions to us, as further described below. Tier I, II, and III Incentive Units were designed to vest in three annual installments (25% on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, and 50% on the third anniversary, with the second and third installments vesting on a monthly basis) although vesting would be fully accelerated upon the occurrence of a "change in control" (as defined below under "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control") occurring prior to the time-based vesting becoming satisfied. The difference between a vested and unvested Incentive Unit was that once vested, in the event that the executive's employment terminated other than for "cause" (defined below), the executive would retain all vested profits interests awards as non-voting interests. Any unvested profits interests would be forfeited without consideration upon the holder's termination of employment or service, except in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment, for which accelerated vesting was provided, as described below.

            Under the Holdings LLC Agreement, the Tier I, Tier II and Tier III Incentive Units were entitled to 15%, 20% and 30%, respectively, of future distributions to members only after equity owners had received certain cumulative levels of distributions in respect of their membership interests.

            As used in the paragraphs above, a "capital contribution" to Holdings generally meant, for any member thereof, the dollar amount of any cash and the fair market value of any property or services contributed to Holdings.

      Treatment of Incentive Units and RUAs in Connection with the IPO

            In connection with the IPO, all outstanding Incentive Units and RUAs were accelerated and all of Holdings' outstanding equity interests, including the Incentive Units and the RUAs, but excluding the Series A Preferred Units (which were redeemed in connection with the IPO) and the Series B Preferred Units (which were converted into shares of our Series A Preferred Stock) were exchanged for shares of our common stock in connection with the merger of Holdings with and into us, calculated using an implied equity valuation for us based on the initial public offering price set forth on the cover of the IPO prospectus. The aggregate number of shares issued to the existing owners of Holdings were not contingent upon the IPO price; however, the allocation of shares of our common stock amongst our existing owners, including with respect to the outstanding RUAs and Incentive Units held by Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley, was determined based on the 10-day volume weighted average price of our common stock immediately following the closing of the IPO. In accordance with the above allocation mechanism, Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley each received 818,047; 518,576 and 478,947 shares of common stock, respectively, with respect to the RUAs they held in Holdings (including the 2016 RUAs that were granted prior to the offering) and 3,261,566; 3,261,561 and 2,536,770 shares of our common stock, respectively, with respect to the Incentive Units they held in Holdings.

            Following the closing of the IPO, our executive officers no longer receive, pursuant to the Incentive Plan or the Holdings LLC Agreement, additional long-term incentive compensation for services rendered to us or our subsidiaries; rather, any such long-term incentive compensation will be awarded to our Named Executive Officers pursuant to the LTIP, as described in the succeeding paragraphs below.

      2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan

            Our board of directors has adopted, and our equityholders approved, the LTIP, pursuant to which employees, consultants, and directors of our company and its affiliates performing services for us, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to receive awards. The LTIP provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards, substitute awards, annual incentive awards, and performance


    Table of Contents

    awards intended to align the interests of participants with those of our stockholders. The following description of the LTIP is a summary of the material features of the LTIP.LTIP as currently in effect. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the LTIP, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 4.4Appendix A to our 2019 Annual Proxy Statement.


    Our stockholder-approved LTIP is intended to attract, retain, and motivate our employees, directors, and consultants. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed withLTIP, which provides for the Securitiesgrant of cash and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2016.

    equity-based awards, including options to purchase shares of our Common Stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards, performance awards and annual incentive awards. Since the adoption of our LTIP, we have awarded time-vesting RSUs, PSAs, PSUs, and stock options under the LTIP.

            Administration.
    The LTIP is administered by our Board, or a committee thereof (the "Plan Administrator"“Administrator”). The Plan Administrator has the authority to, among other things, designate eligible persons as participants under the LTIP, determine the type or types of awards to be granted to eligible persons, determine the number of shares of our common stockCommon Stock to be covered by awards, determine the terms and conditions applicable to awards, and interpret and administer the LTIP. The Plan Administrator may terminate or amend the LTIP at any time with respect to any shares of our common stockCommon Stock for which a grant has not yet been made. The Plan Administrator also has the right to alter or amend the LTIP or any part of the LTIP from time to time, including increasing the number of shares of our common stockCommon Stock that may be granted, subject to stockholder approval as required by any exchange upon which our common stockCommon Stock is listed at that time. However, no change in any outstanding award may be made that would materially and adversely affect the rights of thea participant under thean award without the consent of the participant.

            Number of Shares.

    Subject to adjustment in the event of any distribution, recapitalization, split, merger, consolidation, or similar corporate event, the number of shares available for delivery pursuant to awards granted under the LTIP will not exceed 20,200,00032,200,000 shares of our common stock.Common Stock. There is no limit on the number of awards that may be granted and paid in cash. Shares subject to awards under the LTIP that are expired, canceled, forfeited, exchanged, settled in cash, or otherwise terminated, including shares withheld to satisfyin payment of any exercise or purchase prices or tax withholding obligations, will again be available for awards under the LTIP. The shares of our common stock to be delivered under the LTIP will be made available from authorized but unissued shares, shares held in treasury, or previously issued shares reacquired by us, including by purchase on the open market.

            Stock Options.    A stock option, or option, is a right to purchase shares of our common stock at a specified price during specified time periods. It is anticipated that options will have an exercise price that may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the LTIP can be either incentive options (within the meaning of section 422 of the Code), which have certain tax advantages for recipients, or non-qualified options. No option will have a term that exceeds ten years.

            Stock Appreciation Rights.    A stock appreciation right is an award that, upon exercise, entitles a participant to receive the excess of the fair market value of our common stock on the exercise date over the grant price established for the stock appreciation right on the date of grant. Such excess will be paid in a form (cash, shares of our common stock, etc.) determined by the Plan Administrator. It is anticipated that stock appreciation rights will have a grant price that may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

            Restricted Stock Grant.    A restricted stock grant is an award of common stock that vests over a period of time and, during such time, is subject to transfer limitations, a risk of forfeiture, and other restrictions imposed by the Plan Administrator, in its discretion. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of the LTIP or an award agreement, during the restricted period, a participant will have rights as a stockholder, including the right to vote the common stock subject to the award and to receive cash dividends thereon (which may, if required by the Plan Administrator, be subjected to the same vesting terms that apply to the underlying award of restricted stock).


    Table of Contents

            Restricted Stock Units.    A restricted stock unit is a notional share that entitles the grantee to receive shares of our common stock, cash, or a combination thereof, as determined by the Plan Administrator, at some future date following the vesting of the restricted stock unit.

            Bonus Stock Awards.    A bonus stock award is a transfer of unrestricted shares of our common stock on terms and conditions determined by the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator will determine any terms and conditions applicable to grants of common stock, including performance criteria, if any, associated with a bonus stock award.

            Dividend Equivalents.    Dividend equivalents entitle a participant to receive cash, common stock, other awards, or other property equal in value to dividends paid with respect to a specified number of shares of our common stock, or other periodic payments at the discretion of the Plan Administrator. Dividend equivalents may be granted on a free-standing basis or in connection with another award (other than an award of restricted stock or a bonus stock award).

            Other Stock-Based Awards.    Other stock-based awards are award denominated in or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, the value of our common stock.

            Substitute Awards.    Substitute awards may be granted under the LTIP in substitution for similar awards held for individuals who become eligible persons as a result of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition of another entity (or the assets of another entity) by or with us or one of our affiliates.

            Performance Awards and Annual Incentive Awards.    A performance award is a right to receive all or part of an award granted under the LTIP based upon performance conditions specified by the Plan Administrator. The Plan Administrator will determine the period over which certain specified company or individual goals or objectives must be met. An annual incentive award is an award based on a performance period of the fiscal year and is also conditioned on one or more performance standards. The performance or annual incentive award may be paid in cash, common stock, other awards or other property, in the discretion of the Plan Administrator.

            One or more of the following business criteria as applied to us on a consolidated basis, and/or to our subsidiaries, divisions, businesses or geographical units (except with respect to the total stockholder return, change in fair market value of our common stock, and earnings per share criteria) may be used by the Plan Administrator in establishing performance conditions for performance awards granted to covered employees: (1) earnings per share; (2) revenues; (3) cash flow; (4) cash flow from operations; (5) cash flow return; (6) return on net assets; (7) return on assets; (8) return on investment; (9) return on capital; (10) return on equity; (11) economic value added; (12) operating margin; (13) contribution margin; (14) net income; (15) net income per share; (16) pretax earnings; (17) pretax earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization; (18) pretax operating earnings after interest expense and before incentives, service fees, and extraordinary or special items; (19) total stockholder return; (20) debt reduction or management; (21) market share; (22) change in the Fair Market Value of the Stock; (23) operating income; (24) enterprise value; (25) reserve volumes, present value of reserves, or PV-10; (26) top level production volumes; (27) finding and development costs or production costs per BOE; (28) net production (BOE/d); (29) lease operating expenses; (30) number of drilling locations; and (31) any of the above goals determined on a basic or adjusted basis, or on an absolute or relative basis, as compared to the performance of a published or special index deemed applicable by the Plan Administrator, including, but not limited to, the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index or a group of comparable companies.

            Tax Withholding.    The Plan Administrator will determine, in its sole discretion, the form of payment acceptable to satisfy a participant's obligations with respect to withholding taxes and other tax obligations relating to an award, including, without limitation, the delivery of cash or cash equivalents,


    Table of Contents

    common stock (including previously owned shares, net settlement, broker-assisted sale or other cashless withholding or reduction of the amount of shares of our common stock otherwise issuable or delivered pursuant to the award), other property or any other legal consideration that the Plan Administrator deems appropriate.

            Merger, Recapitalization, or Change in Control.    If any change is made to our capitalization, such as a stock split, stock combination, stock dividend, exchange of shares or other recapitalization, merger or otherwise, which results in an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding shares of common stock, appropriate adjustments will be made by the Plan Administrator to the shares available under the LTIP and the shares subject to awards granted under the LTIP. The Plan Administrator will also have the discretion to make certain adjustments to awards in the event of a change in control, such as accelerating the exercisability of options or SARs, requiring the surrender of an award, with or without consideration, or making any other adjustment or modification to the award that the Plan Administrator feels is appropriate in light of the transaction.

            Termination of Employment or Service.    The consequences of the termination of a participant's employment, consulting arrangement, or membership on the board of directors will be determined by the Plan Administrator in the terms of the relevant award agreement.

            In connection with the closing of the IPO, we granted stock options to our then Named Executive Officers. On October 11, 2016, Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley each received an award of options to purchase 1,500,000 shares. The options vest ratably in three equal annual tranches on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. We also made grants of RSUs to certain key employees (including our Named Executive Officers) in recognition of their increased efforts during the process of preparing for the IPO. Messrs. Erickson, Owens, and Kelley each received a grant of 500,000 RSUs and Mr. Brock received a grant of 125,000 RSUs. Mr. Christ received a grant of 75,000 RSUs on November 16, 2016 following his hire. The RSUs vest over a period of three years, as follows: 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant, 25% on the second anniversary, and 50% on the third anniversary. The options and the restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements under which they were granted, as well as the terms of the LTIP, or as otherwise provided in the employment agreements entered into with the Named Executive Officers, as described below in "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Employment Agreements."

    Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End


    The following table reflects information regarding outstanding equity-based awards that were held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2017.2019. The amounts shown in the following table for Stock Awards represent RSUs and PSAs and the amounts shown in the table for Option Awardsoption awards represent nonstatutory stock options, all granted to our Named Executive Officers pursuant to the


    Table of Contents

    LTIP. For additional information, see the discussion above under "2017“2019 Awards Underunder the LTIP"LTIP” and "Long-Term“Long-Term Incentive Compensation."


     
      
      
      
      
      
     Stock Awards 
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
     Equity
    incentive
    plan awards:
    market or
    payout
    value of
    unearned
    shares, units
    or other
    rights that
    have not
    vested(5)
    ($)
     
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
     Equity
    incentive
    plan awards:
    number of
    unearned
    shares, units
    or other
    rights that
    have not
    vested(6)
    (#)
     
     
     Options Awards  
      
     
     
      
     Market
    Value of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested(5)
    ($)
     
    Name
     Date of
    Grant
     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options,
    Exercisable(1)
    (#)
     Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options,
    Unexercisable(1)
    (#)
     Option
    Exercise
    Price
    ($)
     Option
    Expiration
    Date
     Number of
    Shares of
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested(2)
    (#)
     

    Mark A. Erickson

      10/11/2016  500,000  1,000,000  19.00  10/11/2026             

      10/17/2016              375,000(2) 5,366,250       

      10/4/2017  90,043  180,087  15.53  10/4/2027             

      10/4/2017                    150,983  2,160,567 

    Matthew R. Owens

      10/11/2016  500,000  1,000,000  19.00  10/11/2026             

      10/17/2016              375,000(2) 5,336,250       

      10/4/2017  43,974  87,950  15.53  10/4/2027             

      10/4/2017                    73,736  1,055,162 

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr. 

      10/11/2016  377,775(7) 898,150(7) 19.00  10/11/2026             

      10/17/2016              340,569(2)(7) 4,873,542       

      10/4/2017  43,974  87,950  15.53  10/4/2027             

      10/4/2017                    73,736  1,055,162 

    Tom L. Brock

      10/17/2016              93,750(2) 1,341,563       

      11/14/2016              2,250(3) 32,197       

      3/15/2017              49,259(4) 704,896       

      10/4/2017  20,940  41,881  15.53  10/4/2027             

      10/4/2017                    35,113  502,467 

    Eric J. Christ

      11/16/2016              56,250(2) 804,937       

      3/15/2017              50,309(4) 719,922       

      10/4/2017  20,940  41,881  15.53  10/4/2027             

      10/4/2017                    35,113  502,467 
    30




    Options AwardsStock Awards
    NameDate of GrantNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options, Exercisable (1) (#)Option Exercise Price ($)Option Expiration DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(5) ($)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
    Matthew R. Owens10/11/20161,500,00019.0010/11/2026
    10/4/2017131,92415.5310/4/2027
    3/1/2018173,841(6)368,543(6)
    4/5/2019201,926(7)987,418(7)
    4/5/2019120,160(7)254,739(7)
    4/5/2019107,362(2)227,607
    Tom L. Brock3/15/201714,074(4)29,837
    10/4/201762,82115.5310/4/2027
    3/1/201882,781(6)175,497(6)
    4/5/201970,593(7)345,200(7)
    4/5/201931,657(7)67,113(7)
    4/5/2019102,249(2)216,768
    Eric J. Christ3/15/201714,374(4)30,473
    10/4/201762,82115.5310/4/2027
    3/1/201882,781(6)175,497(6)
    5/3/201837,500(2)79,500
    4/5/201970,593(7)345,200(7)
    4/5/201931,657(7)67,113(7)
    4/5/2019102,249(2)216,768
    Marianella Foschi3/15/20177,500(4)15,900
    3/15/201822,500(2)47,700
    4/5/201930,976(2)65,669
    Mark A. Erickson10/11/20161,500,00019.0010/11/2026
    10/4/2017270,13015.5310/4/2027
    3/1/2018355,960(6)754,636(6)
    4/5/2019413,467(7)2,021,853(7)
    4/5/2019246,042(7)521,609(7)
    4/5/2019219,836(2)466,052
    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.10/11/20161,275,925(8)19.0010/11/2026
    10/4/2017131,92415.5310/4/2027
    3/1/2018173,841(6)368,543(6)
    4/5/2019201,9267(7)987,418(7)
    4/5/2019120,160(7)254,739(7)
    ___________________________
    (1)
    Amounts in this column represent nonstatutory stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the LTIP. The options become exercisable in equal annual installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The treatment of these awards upon certain termination and change in control events is described below under "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon a Termination or Change in Control."

    (2)
    These RSUs were granted pursuant to the terms of the LTIP and are subject to time-based vesting conditions, with 25% vesting on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant, and the remaining 50% vesting on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The treatment of these awards upon certain termination and change in control events is described below under "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon a Termination or Change in Control."

    (3)
    These restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted pursuant to the terms of the LTIP and are subject to time-based vesting conditions, with 25% vesting on each of July 17, 2017, January 17, 2018, July 17, 2018, and January 17, 2019. The treatment of these awards upon certain termination and change in control events is described below under "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon a Termination or Change in Control."

    (4)
    These RSUs were granted pursuant to the terms of the LTIP and are subject to time-based vesting conditions, with 12.5% vesting after six, twelve, eighteen6, 12, 18, and twenty-four24 months and 25% vesting after thirty30 and thirty-six36 months from the date of grant. The treatment of these awards upon certain termination and change in control events is described below under "Potential“Potential Payments Uponupon a Termination or Change in Control."

    (5)
    Amounts in this column are calculated using a value of $14.31$2.12 per RSU, or PSA, as applicable, which was the closing price of one share of our common stockCommon Stock as of December 29, 2017,31, 2019, the last trading day of the year.

    (6)
    TheThese awards reported in this column represent PSAs granted to our Named Executive Officers on October 4, 2017.March 1, 2018. The number of outstanding PSAs reported reflects the target number of PSAs that would have been delivered under the awards based on our (i) relative TSR ranking, (ii) absolute TSR, and (iii) projected cash returned on capital invested for the applicable performance period as of December 31, 2017,2019, and is not necessarily indicative of what the payout percent earned will be at the end of the
    31




    performance period. However, if the performance period had ended December 31, 2019, none of these PSAs would have been earned. These awards vest on December 31, 2020, subject to the attainment of certain performance criteria.
    (7)These awards represent PSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers on April 5, 2019. The number of outstanding PSUs reported reflects the target number of PSUs that would have been delivered under the awards based on our (i) relative TSR ranking, (ii) absolute TSR, and (iii) return on capital invested for the performance period as of December 31, 2019, and is not necessarily indicative of what the payout percent earned will be at the end of the performance period. AllHowever, if the performance period had ended December 31, 2019, none of these PSUs would have been earned. These awards vest on December 31, 2019,2021, subject to the attainment of certain performance criteria as discussed in the section of our Compensation Discussion and Analysis entitled "2017 Performance Stock“2019 Awards and Stock Options under the LTIP," above.

    (7)
    (8)Amounts in this column do not reflect certain unvested RSUs and vested and unvested nonstatutory stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the LTIP for which beneficial ownership interest werewas transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order. Pursuant to a domestic relations order entered in 2017, Mr. Kelley transferred 224,075 number of options (exercise price of $19.00) and 63,943 RSUs to his ex-spouse.

    Table of Contents

    Options ExercisedExercises and Stock Vested

     
     Stock Awards 
    Name(1)
     Number of
    Shares Acquired
    on Vesting(2)
    (#)
     Value Realized
    on Vesting(5)
    ($)
     

    Mark A. Erickson

      125,000  1,992,500(2)

    Matthew R. Owens

      125,000  1,992,500(2)

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr. 

      95,488  1,522,079(2)(6)

    Tom L. Brock

      31,250  498,125(2)

      1,125  14,321(3)

      7,037  97,040(4)

    Eric J. Christ

      18,750  282,187(5)

      7,187  99,109(4)


    Stock Awards
    Name(1)Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(#)Value Realized on Vesting($)
    Matthew R. Owens250,000580,000(2)
    Tom L. Brock1,1255,378(3)
    7,03727,867(4)
    14,07445,459(5)
    62,500145,000(2)
    Eric J. Christ7,18728,461(4)
    12,50057,250(6)
    14,37446,428(5)
    37,50067,500(7)
    Marianella Foschi16,87580,663(3)
    7,50031,200(8)
    3,75014,850(4)
    7,50024,225(5)
    37,50087,000(2)
    Mark A. Erickson250,000580,000(2)
    Russell T. Kelley, Jr230,325534,354(2)(9)
    ___________________________
    (1)
    There have been no options exercised by our Named Executive Officers to date.

    (2)
    This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $15.94,$2.32, the closing price of our stockCommon Stock on the vesting date, October 17, 2017.

    2019.
    (3)
    This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $12.73,$4.78, the closing price of our stockCommon Stock on the vesting date, JulyJanuary 17, 2017.

    2019.
    (4)
    This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $13.79,$3.96, the closing price of our stockCommon Stock on the vesting date, SeptemberMarch 15, 2017.

    2019.
    (5)
    This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $15.05,$3.23, the closing price of our stockCommon Stock on the vesting date, September 13, 2019.
    (6)This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $4.58, the closing price of our Common Stock on the vesting date, May 3, 2019.
    (7)This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $1.80, the closing price of our Common Stock on the vesting date, November 16, 2017.

    (6)
    15, 2019.
    (8)This amount was calculated by multiplying the number of shares acquired on vesting by $4.16, the closing price of our Common Stock on the vesting date, March 1, 2019.
    (9)This amount excludes 29,51219,675 shares attributable to RSUs that vested in 20172019 which were transferred to Mr. Kelley'sKelley’s ex-wife pursuant to a domestic relations order prior to their vesting.


    32




    Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control

    Employment Agreements

    Each of our Named Executive Officers other than Ms. Foschi was party to an employment agreement with us during 2019. Under their respective employment agreements, each executive was entitled to certain severance benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment. The employment agreements included customary restrictive covenants, including those precluding the executives from soliciting employees or competing with us for a period of up to two years following termination of employment. As described aboveof the Record Date, only Mr. Owens is still party to an employment agreement with us (as well as our new Executive Chairman, Mr. Tyree, who entered into an employment agreement with us in "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End—Employment Agreements," we entered intoMarch 2020). The employment agreements with Messrs. Erickson Owens and Kelley terminated in connection with their respective employment terminations. See “Erickson Transition Agreement” and “Kelley Separation Agreement” below for a description of the IPO andseverance benefits each received in connection with his respective termination. The employment agreements with Messrs. Brock and Mr. Christ shortly thereafter. Thewere terminated in early 2020 when they became covered, along with Ms. Foschi, under our Executive Severance Plan. See “Executive Severance Plan” below for a description of the employment agreements set forth below is a summary ofseverance benefits under the material features of the agreements regarding potential payments upon termination or a change in control. This summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of all the provisions of the agreements that we have entered into with the executives. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the employment agreements, which (i) for Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley were filed as Exhibits 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2016, (ii) for Mr. Brock was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2016 and (iii) for Mr. Christ was filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2018.

    plan.


    Under the terms of the employment agreements in effect in 2019 (and for Mr. Owens currently), each Named Executive Officer is entitledwas eligible to receive the following amounts uponseverance benefits described immediately below.

    Upon a termination by the Company for "Cause" (as such term is defined below), upon a termination of employment by reason of death, disability, upon expiration of the term of the employment agreement, or upon the executive's termination without "Good Reason"


    Table of Contents

    (as such term is defined below): (a) payment of all accrued and unpaid base salary to the date of termination, (b) reimbursement of all incurred but unreimbursed business expenses to which the executive would have been entitled to reimbursement, and (c) benefits to which the executive is entitled under the terms of any applicable benefit plan or program (together, the "Accrued Rights"). If the termination is due to death or disability, Messrs. Erickson, Owens, and Kelley will, in addition to the Accrued Rights, alsowould be entitled to (x)(i) a severance payment equal to one1.0 times the sum of the applicable Named Executive Officer'sOfficer’s base salary on the date of termination and the average annual bonus for the two prior calendar years and (y)(ii) accelerated vesting of any outstanding time-based LTIP awards.


    Each Named Executive Officer is alsowould be entitled to receive the following amountsseverance benefits upon a termination by the executive for Good Reason“good reason” or by the Company without Cause“cause” (each as defined in the employment agreement and each, a "Qualifying Termination"“Qualifying Termination”): (a) the Accrued Rights; (b) any earned but unpaid annual bonus for the prior year; (c)(b) a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination (excluding Messrs. Brock and Christ); (d)(c) a severance payment equal to the sum of (x) each Named Executive Officer'sOfficer’s annual base salary times a multiple (for Messrs. Brock and Christ, 0.5; for Mr. Kelley, 1.5; and for Messrs. Erickson and Owens, 2.0) and (y) for Messrs. Kelley, Erickson, and Owens, their respective average annual bonus for the two prior calendar years times the same multiple; (e)(d) accelerated vesting of any outstanding LTIP awards (including time- and performance-vesting awards) held by the Executiveexecutive as of the date of termination (except for Messrs. Brock and Christ); and (f)(e) continued coverage under our group health plan for any COBRA period (during the first 6 months for Messrs. Brock and Christ, and up to 18 months for Messrs. Erickson and Owens) elected for the executive and the executive'sexecutive’s spouse and eligible dependents, at no greater premium cost than that which applies to our active senior executive employees.


    In addition, if such Qualifying Termination occursoccurred within the 12-month period followingafter a Changechange in Control,control of the Company, the above entitlements would be modified as follows: (1) the respective multiple would increase to 1.0 for Messrs. Brock and Christ, 2.0 for Mr. Kelley, and 3.0 for Messrs. Erickson and Owens; (2) the continued COBRA coverage for Messrs. Brock and Christ would increase to 12 months; and (3) Messrs. Brock and Christ would be entitled to accelerated vesting of any outstanding LTIP awards.


    Executive Severance Plan

    The Company has adopted an Executive Severance Plan and on March 4, 2020 entered into participation agreements thereunder (each, a “Participation Agreement”) with each of Mr. Christ, Mr. Brock, and Ms. Foschi. Pursuant to the Participation Agreements, effective March 4, 2020, the benefits under the Executive Severance Plan will replace the existing employment agreements between the Company and each of Mr. Christ and Mr. Brock, and the existing employment agreements were terminated. Ms. Foschi was not subject to a prior employment agreement.

    The Executive Severance Plan provides that in the event that employment of a participating employee is terminated by the Company other than for “cause” (and not by reason of death or disability) or if the executive terminates his or her employment for “good reason” (the terms “cause” and “good reason,” as defined in the Executive Severance Plan), and subject to the employee’s execution of a general release of claims against the Company and compliance with restrictive covenants, the employee is entitled to receive severance benefits consisting of:

    33




    a lump sum cash amount equal to a multiple of the participant’s annual base salary as in effect immediately before the termination, with the multiple varying by participant, but established at 1.33 for Messrs. Christ and Brock and Ms. Foschi;

    a pro-rated target annual cash bonus for the year of termination (based on the number of days employed during the year of termination);

    up to 18 months of Company-paid COBRA coverage;

    vesting of all outstanding and unvested time-based equity awards;

    pro-rated vesting of outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards (based on the number of days employed during the applicable performance period); and

    each exercisable equity plan award (e.g., a stock option or a stock appreciation right) that is or becomes exercisable will remain exercisable until the latest date on which the award would have expired by its original terms.

    Under the Executive Severance Plan, if such a termination of employment occurs within the 18-month period immediately following a change of control, the executive would be entitled to the benefits described in the preceding paragraph subject to the same release of claims and restrictive covenant requirements, except that the salary continuation discussed in the first bullet above would be replaced by a lump sum cash payment equal to a higher multiple of the executive’s base salary plus their target annual bonus in effect immediately prior to termination (with the multiple varying by participant, but established at 2.0 for Messrs. Christ and Brock and Ms. Foschi) and the vesting acceleration of outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards would be 100% of the unvested performance-based equity awards based on the greater of target and actual level of performance through the date of the Company’s fiscal quarter end before the change in control, rather than a pro-rated portion.

    The Executive Severance Plan also provides for a lump sum cash payment equal to the executive’s base salary and a pro-rated target annual bonus payment, along with full vesting acceleration of time-based and performance-based equity awards (based on actual level of performance through the date of the Company’s fiscal quarter end before the termination) in the event that a participating executive dies or becomes disabled while employed by the Company subject to the same release of claims and restrictive covenant requirements.

    Erickson Transition Agreement

    On March 5, 2020, Mr. Erickson’s service as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board, and from all positions at the Company’s subsidiaries, was terminated effective March 4, 2020 (the “Transition Date”). As part of this termination, the Company and Mr. Erickson on March 18, 2020 entered into an Employment Transition Agreement (the “Transition Agreement”), effective as of the Transition Date, pursuant to which Mr. Erickson transitioned to Senior Advisor to assist in the smooth transition of his duties and responsibilities from the Transition Date until the fourth anniversary of the Transition Date (the “Transition Period”).

    Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Mr. Erickson will, as a non-executive Company employee, (i) receive an annualized base salary of $75,000 during the Transition Period, (ii) continue to be entitled to his annual bonus for 2019 and a prorated annual bonus for 2020 for service through the Transition Date, (iii) receive a cash transition payment of $1,840,000, (iv) continue to vest in outstanding equity-based awards subject to, and in accordance with, their respective terms, except that all time-based vesting conditions for outstanding equity-based awards will be deemed to have been satisfied as of the Transition Date, and (v) be allowed to participate in all benefit plans and programs of the Company during the Transition Period. The Transition Agreement also includes customary non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disparagement covenants in favor of the Company.

    Kelley Separation Agreement

    In connection with Mr. Kelley’s resignation, the Company and Mr. Kelley into a Separation and General Release Agreement (the “Kelley Separation Agreement”), providing for, among other things, compensation and benefits to Mr. Kelley as follows: (i) a pro-rated annual bonus for 2019, in the amount of $165,750, to be paid on or
    34




    before the date such annual bonuses are paid to executives who continue employment; (ii) a lump sum cash payment, in the amount of $1,500,487; (iii) immediate accelerated vesting of all Company equity awards that are subject to time-based vesting, continued vesting of any equity awards subject to performance-based vesting based on actual performance through the end of the respective performance period, and the ability to exercise all stock options for the full original term of the applicable award; and (iv) up to 18 months of continued Company-funded COBRA coverage. The Kelley Separation Agreement also contains customary releases and waivers of claims by Mr. Kelley and provides that Mr. Kelley will be reasonably available to the Company during mutually agreeable times to provide transition and consulting related support.

    Table Illustrating Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

    The following terms are defined undertable provides information regarding the employment agreements forpayments and benefits to which our Named Executive Officers would be entitled in the event of termination of such individual’s employment with the Company and under specified circumstances and in the event of a change in control of the Company. Except as otherwise noted, the amounts shown (i) are qualified by reference to each Executive's agreement, substantially similar to as described below:

      "Cause" generally means a determination by our board of directors (the "Board") (or its delegate)estimates only and (ii) assume that the executive (a)applicable termination of employment was effective, or that the change in control occurred, as of December 31, 2019. As of the Record Date, each of Messrs. Erickson and Kelley has engaged in gross negligence, gross incompetence or willful misconductexperienced a termination of employment and the actual severance benefits they received are described immediately above, rather than being reflected in the performance oftable below. For Messrs. Brock and Christ and Ms. Foschi, the executive's duties with respect to us or any of our affiliates, (b) has failed without proper legal reason to substantially performamounts shown below reflect the executive's dutiespayments and responsibilities to us or any of our affiliates, (c) has materially breached any provision ofbenefits they would have received under the employment agreement, (d) has committed an act of theft, fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or willful breach of a fiduciary duty to us or any of our affiliates, or (e) hasExecutive Severance Plan had they been convicted of, pleaded no contest to or received adjudicated probation or deferred adjudication in connection with a crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude or any felony (or a crime of similar import in a foreign jurisdiction). In order to terminate the executive's employment for Cause, the Board (or its delegate) must provide the executive with a written notice providing in reasonable detail the specific circumstances alleged to constitute Cause and the executive must not have cured or remedied the alleged Cause event (if susceptible to cure)participants in the Board's (or its delegate) good faith judgment within thirty (30) days forplan as of December 31, 2019. As described above under Executive Severance Plan, Messrs. Erickson, OwensBrock and KelleyChrist and within ten (10) daysMs. Foschi became participants in our Executive Severance Plan in March 2020. The amounts shown below for Messrs. Brock and Christ after his receiptare consistent with their prior employment agreements, but provide for additional benefits under the Executive Severance Plan.

    ExecutiveTermination of Employment by the Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason ($)Termination by Company Without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason within 12-months following Change of Control ($)Termination of Employment by Death or Disability ($)Termination of Employment by the Company for Cause, by Executive without Good Reason or by Certain Notice of Non-Renewal ($)
    Matthew R. Owens
    Cash Payments2,630,0003,720,000884,500
    Accelerated Equity227,607(1)1,838,308227,607
    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums40,99140,991
    Total2,898,5985,599,2991,112,107
    Tom L. Brock
    Cash Payments718,8541,207,675603,838
    Accelerated Equity227,078(1)864,887277,078
    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums40,99140,991
    Total1,036,9242,113,554880,916
    Eric J. Christ
    Cash Payments718,8541,207,675603,838
    Accelerated Equity326,741(1)914,550326,741
    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums40,99140,991
    Total1,086,5872,163,217930,579
    Marianella Foschi
    Cash Payments768,528(2)1,088,528(2)668,528(2)
    Accelerated Equity129,269129,269129,269
    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums13,40013,400
    Total911,1971,231,197797,797
    ___________________________
    35




    (1)Does not include vesting of such notice.

    Tableoutstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards, which would only result based on actual performance through the end of Contentsthe respective performance period. For Messrs. Brock and Christ, the amount of outstanding and unvested performance-based equity awards that would vest would be based on the number of days employed during the applicable performance period.

    "Good Reason" generally means (a) a material diminution(2)Includes accelerated vesting of an award of time-based restricted cash in the executive's base salary; (b) a material diminution inamount of $245,528.

    Pay Ratio

    As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the executive's authority, duties, or responsibilities; (c)following information about the involuntary relocationratio of the geographic locationmedian annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Erickson, our Chief Executive Officer at December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2019:

    The median of the executive's principal placeannual total compensation of employment by more than 50 miles fromall employees of our Company, except our former CEO, was reasonably estimated to be $153,049.
    The annual total compensation of Mr. Erickson was $5,583,242.
    Based on this information, the locationratio of the executive's principal placeannual total compensation of employment asour former CEO to the median of the effective date of the employment agreement; or (d) a material breach by us of the employment agreement.

    "Change in Control" generally means (a) a merger with another entity, consolidation involving the Company, or saleannual total compensation of all other employees is estimated to be 36.5 to 1.

    We have determined that there were no changes in our employee population or substantially all ofemployee compensation arrangements in 2019 that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change in our assets if (i) our stockholders or holders of equity securities immediately prior to such transaction or event do not continue to own at least 50% of the voting power of the resulting entity in substantiallypay ratio disclosure. Thus, as permitted by SEC rules, we are using the same proportionsmedian employee that they ownedwe identified for purposes of last year’s pay ratio disclosure. We identified our equity securities prior to the transaction or event or (ii) the members of our board immediately prior to the transaction or event do not constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the resulting entity immediately after the transaction or event; (b) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company; (c) when any person, entity, or "group" (as contemplatedmedian employee by section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) acquires or gains ownership or control of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding securities of the Company; or (d) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were members of our board immediately before such election cease to constitute a majority of the board.

            As described above, prior to the IPO, our Board accelerated the vestingexamining base wages plus overtime and cash bonuses of all outstanding Incentive Units and RUAs of Messrs. Erickson, Owens and Kelley, including the 2016 RUAs, in light of the holders' efforts in accomplishing certain corporate transactions that occurred in connection with the IPO.

            The foregoing description is not intended to be a comprehensive summary of the employment agreements and is qualified in its entiretyindividuals employed by reference to such agreements, which are on file with the SEC. The following table sets forth the payments and benefits that would be received by each named executive officer in the event a termination of employment or a Change in Control of the Company had occurredus on December 31, 2017, over2018 (other than Mr. Erickson), whether full-time, part-time, or on a seasonable basis. We annualized wages and above any payments or benefits he or she otherwise


    Table of Contents

    would already have been entitled to or vested in on such date under any employment contract or other plansalaries for all permanent employees who were hired after January 1, 2018, as permitted by SEC rules. Once we identified our median employee, we added together all of the Company.

    elements of such employee’s compensation for 2019 in the same way that we calculate the annual total compensation of our Named Executive Officers in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table. The following benefits were included in our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2019: base salary, annual cash bonus, grant date fair value of equity and restricted cash awards, and matching contributions we made to the employee’s account under our 401(k) Employee Savings Plan.

    To calculate Mr. Erickson’s annual total compensation, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2019 Summary Compensation Table.

    The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.


    36




    Executive
     Termination of
    Employment by
    the Company
    without Cause or
    by Executive for
    Good Reason ($)
     Termination by
    Company Without
    Cause or by the
    Executive for Good
    Reason within
    12-months following
    Change of Control ($)
     Termination of
    Employment by
    Death or
    Disability ($)
     Termination of
    Employment by
    the Company for
    Cause, by Executive
    without Good
    Reason or by
    Certain Notice of
    Non-Renewal ($)
     

    Mark A. Erickson

                 

    Cash Payments

      3,013,582  4,520,373  1,506,791   

    Accelerated Equity

      7,526,817  7,526,817  7,526,817   

    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums

      23,217  23,217     

    Total

      10,563,616  12,070,407  9,033,608  0 

    Matthew R. Owens

                 

    Cash Payments

      2,400,649  3,600,974  1,200,325   

    Accelerated Equity

      6,421,412  6,421,412  6,421,412   

    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums

      23,217  23,217     

    Total

      8,845,278  10,045,603  7,621,737  0 

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.

                 

    Cash Payments

      2,025,487  2,400,649  1,200,325   

    Accelerated Equity

      5,928,705  5,928,705  5,928,705   

    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums

      34,384  34,384     

    Total

      7,988,576  8,363,738  7,129,030  0 

    Tom L. Brock

                 

    Cash Payments

      155,000  310,000     

    Accelerated Equity

        2,581,123     

    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums

      11,461  22,923     

    Total

      166,461  2,914,046  0  0 

    Eric J. Christ

                 

    Cash Payments

      155,000  310,000     

    Accelerated Equity

        2,027,326     

    Reimbursement for COBRA premiums

      11,461  22,923     

    Total

      166,461  2,360,249  0  0 

    Table of Contents

    Director Compensation


    Our non-employee directors received compensation in 2017for 2019 as reflected in the following table:

    Name
     Fees Earned
    or Paid
    in Cash(1)
    ($)
     Stock
    Awards(2)
    ($)
     Total
    ($)
     

    Marvin M. Chronister

      106,344  130,084  236,428 

    Donald L. Evans

      91,049  130,084  221,133 

    John S. Gaensbauer

      80,000  130,084  210,084 

    Peter A. Leidel

      116,003  130,084  246,087 

    Wayne W. Murdy

      103,844  130,084  233,928 

    Patrick D. O'Brien

      98,890  130,084  228,974 


    NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash(1)
    ($)
    Stock Awards(2)
    ($)
    Total
    ($)
    Marvin M. Chronister106,500129,998236,498
    Donald L. Evans51,630129,998181,628
    John S. Gaensbauer87,364129,998217,362
    Peter A. Leidel100,887129,998230,885
    Wayne W. Murdy119,000129,998248,998
    Patrick D. O’Brien104,000129,998233,998
    Audrey Robertson25,829242,250268,079
    ___________________________
    (1)
    Reflects the aggregate of the pro-rated annual retainer, committee membership retainers, committee chair retainers, (as applicable) and lead independent director retainer (as(each, as applicable) earned by each of our directors pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program (as described below) for services performed during 2017.

    2019.
    (2)
    Amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of restricted stock units granted during 2017.2019. The amounts shown are based on the closing price of our common stockCommon Stock on the date ofday prior to the grant, which was May 4, 2017.15, 2019 for all directors other than Ms. Robertson, who was granted RSUs on September 16, 2019. The value ultimately received by the director may or may not be equal to the values reflected above. Amounts in this column do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the director. See "Note 11—Unit and “Note 12—Stock-Based Compensation"Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K relating to fiscal year 20172019 for additional detail regarding assumptions underlying the value of these awards. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown in the table above for the restricted stock units exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. In 2017, 8,9162019, 31,553 restricted stock units were granted to each of our non-managementnon-employee directors (other than Ms. Robertson, who was granted 75,000 restricted stock units), all of which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
    2019 (other than those granted to Mr. Evans, which were forfeited upon his departure from the Board in July 2019). The RSUs granted to Ms. Robertson are scheduled to vest ratably over three years from September 16, 2019, subject to her continuous service as a director. The RSUs granted to each of the other non-employee directors on May 15, 2019, are scheduled to vest on May 15, 2020, subject to continuous service as a director.


    Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

    Our board of directorsBoard believes that attracting and retaining qualified non-employee directors on a going-forward basis will be critical to the future value growth and governance of our company.Company. Our board of directorsBoard also believes that the compensation package for our non-employee directors should require a portion of the total compensation to be equity-based to align the interests of these directors with our stockholders. Under our current program, our non-employee directors receive the following:


    An annual retainer of $80,000;


    No board or committee meeting fees;


    Committee membership retainers of:


    $7,500 for the audit committee,Audit Committee, Executive Committee, and Finance Committee,


    $7,500 for the executive committee,

    $5,000 for the compensation committee,Compensation Committee, and


    $4,000 for the governance/nominating committee;Nominating and Governance Committee;


    Committee chair retainers of:


    $20,000 for the audit committee,
    Audit Committee,

    Table of Contents

        $15,000 for the compensation committee,

        $15,000 for the executive committee,Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, and Finance Committee, and


    $8,000 for the governance/nominating committee;Nominating and Governance Committee;


    Annual equity grants of restricted stock units with a fair market value at grant of $130,000;$130,000, which are generally scheduled to vest over the course of a year; and


    Lead independent director retainer of $15,000.


    37




    Director Stock Ownership Guidelines


    FeatureNon-Employee Director
    Structure and Amount3X Annual Cash Retainer

    Shares that Count Towards Requirements

    Vested and unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs

    Shares purchased in the open market

    Shares beneficially owned within the immediate family


    Time Period to Meet Compliance


    No set time period, but cannot sell stock until requirements are satisfied, other than (i) shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations and (ii) shares disposed to satisfy the exercise price of Company stock options.satisfied.



    38




    Equity Compensation Plan Information

    The following table sets forth the number of the Company’s common shares subject to outstanding awards, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, and the number of shares remaining available for future awards under our equity compensation plans, in each case, as of December 31, 2019.
    Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) (a)Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b)Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (c)
    Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders8,463,571$18.5117,172,383
    Equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders
    Total8,463,571$18.5117,172,383
    ___________________________
    (1)Includes options, RSUs and PSUs outstanding under the LTIP, provided that the Weighted-Average Exercise Price in column (b) does not take into account the RSUs or PSUs.



    39




    COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

    During 2017,2019, our last completed fiscal year, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that had an executive officer that served on our Board or Compensation Committee. Further, no member of our Board was an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.


    Table of Contents


    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

    Corporate Governance Guidelines

    The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The Company's "CorporateCompany’s “Corporate Governance Guidelines"Guidelines” cover the following principal subjects:


    the size of the Board of Directors;


    qualifications and independence standards for the Board of Directors;


    director responsibilities;


    service on other boards;


    change in status;


    the Chairman of the Board;


    meetings of the Board and of independent directors;


    Board interactions with external constituencies;


    committee functions and independence of committee members;


    compensation of the Board of Directors;


    self-evaluation and succession planning;


    director orientation and continuing education;


    director attendance at the annual board meeting of stockholders;


    ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current "Corporate“Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics"Ethics” is posted on the Company'sCompany’s website atwww.extractionog.com);


    stockholder communications with directors; and


    access to senior management and to independent advisors.


    The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company'sCompany’s website atwww.extractionog.com. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed periodically and as necessary by the Company'sCompany’s Nominating and Governance Committee, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.


    The NASDAQ Global Select Market ("NASDAQ"(“NASDAQ”) has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NASDAQ rules.


    40




    Board Leadership

    The Board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimalDirectors’ leadership structure socurrently separates the CEO and Chairman of the Board positions. Mr. Owens currently serves as to provide independent oversight of management. our President and CEO, and Mr. Tyree serves as our Executive Chairman.

    The Board understandsbelieves that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing board leadership and that each of the optimal Boardpossible leadership structures for a board must be considered in the context of the individuals involved and the specific circumstances facing a company, as the right leadership structure may vary as circumstances warrant. Consistentchange. The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders at this time to have separate CEO and Executive Chairman positions, and have an independent director serve as Lead Independent Director working in conjunction with this understanding, independent directors consider the Board's leadership structure on an annual basis.

    Executive Chairman. The Board has determinedfound that this structure enables the optimal Board leadership structure for us was served by the role of ChairmanCEO to focus on operation of the Board being held by our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Erickson. The Board determined that this leadership structure was optimal for us because it believed that having one leader serving as bothCompany’s business, while the Chairman ofand Lead Independent Director focus on leading the Board and Chief Executive Officer provides decisive, consistent


    Table of Contents

    and effective leadership. By meetingDirectors in executive sessions on a regular basis, the independent directors have the opportunity to identify and evaluate issues facing us, engaging in a frank and candid dialogue without management being present. In February 2017, the Nominating and Governance Committee, in connection with its annual review of the efficacy of the Board's leadership structure, determined to recommend to the Board that it designate Mr. Leidel as the independent lead director. The Board adopted the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee at its March 2017 meeting and Mr. Leidel was appointed Lead Director of the Board. oversight role.


    In February 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended and the Board designated Mr. Murdy as the Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director is responsible for preparing an agenda for the meetings of the independent directors in executive session and for providing the independent directors'directors’ guidance and feedback to our management team.


    Classified Board Structure

    In consultation with the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that a classified board structure is appropriate for the Company. A classified board provides for stability, continuity and experience among our Board of Directors. In our industry in particular, long-term focus is critical. The time horizon required for successful exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas resources makes it vital that we have a Board that understands the implications of this process and has the ability to develop and implement long-term strategies while benefiting from an in-depth knowledge of the Company'sCompany’s business and operations. A classified board structure helps to ensure that there will be the continuity and stability of leadership required to navigate a challenging economic environment while resisting the pressure to focus on short-term results at the expense of the Company'sCompany’s long-term value and success. The future success of the Company depends in significant part on the ability to attract and retain capable and experienced directors. In this regard, we believe that longer terms for our directors will enhance director independence from both management and stockholder special interest groups.


    Communications with the Board of Directors

    Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the Board or our independent directors as a group, by writing to them c/o General Counsel, Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc., 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202. Comments or complaints relating to the Company'sCompany’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the Board.


    Shareholder Outreach

            We engaged with the majority of our shareholders in 2017, as gathering and incorporating shareholder feedback is a priority of both management and the Board. Over the course of the year, our engagement team conducted 197 in-person meetings with our shareholders, including in-person meetings with 16 of our top 25 shareholders representing 74% of the Company's shares outstanding in aggregate.

    Director Independence

    The Company'sCompany’s standards for determining director independence require the assessment of directors'directors’ independence each year. A director cannot be considered independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she does not have any relationship with management or the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, including any of the relationships that would disqualify the director from being independent under the rules of the NASDAQ.


    Table of Contents

    The Board of Directors has assessed the independence of each non-employee director under the Company'sCompany’s guidelines and the independence standards of the NASDAQ.NASDAQ, and additionally considered transactions or relationships between such director and any members of the Company’s senior management or their affiliates. The Board of Directors affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Chronister, Evans,Gaensbauer, Leidel, Murdy, O’Brien and O'BrienMs. Robertson are independent.


    In connection with its assessment of the independence of each non-employee director, the Board of Directors also determined that (a) Messrs. Chronister, EvansGaensbauer and Murdy and Ms. Robertson are independent as defined in Section 10A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and under the
    41




    standards set forth by the NASDAQ applicable to members of the Audit Committee and (b) Messrs. Chronister, Gaensbauer, Leidel and O'BrienO’Brien are independent under the Company’s guidelines and standards set forth by the NASDAQ applicable to members of the Compensation Committee.


    Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

    The Board of Directors most recently evaluated each of the members of the Audit Committee for financial literacy and the attributes of a financial expert in February 2018.March 2020. The Board of Directors determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that Messrs.Mr. Chronister, Mr. Murdy and MurdyMs. Robertson are each an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.


    Oversight of Risk Management

    The Board of Directors as a whole oversees the Company'sCompany’s assessment of major risks and the measures taken to manage such risks. For example, the Board of Directors:


    oversees the long-term strategic plans of the Company and assesses risks and efforts to mitigate such risks that would cause the Company to fail to achieve its strategic goals;


    reviews management'smanagement’s capital spending plans, approves the Company'sCompany’s capital budget and requires that management present for Board review significant departures from those plans;


    oversees management of the Company'sCompany’s commodity price risk through regular review with executive management of the Company'sCompany’s derivatives strategy;


    monitors the Company'sCompany’s liquidity profile and its compliance with the financial covenants contained in its borrowing arrangements; and


    has established specific dollar limits on the commitment authority of members of senior management for certain transactions and requires Board approval of expenditures exceeding that authority and of other material contracts and transactions.


    The Company'sCompany’s Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company'sCompany’s assessment and management of financial reporting and internal control risks, as well as other financial risks, such as the credit risks associated with counterparty exposure. The Audit Committee is responsible for discussing with management the Company'sCompany’s significant financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. Management and the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accountants report regularly to the Audit Committee on those subjects. The Board of Directors does not consider its role in oversight of the Company'sCompany’s risk management function to be relevant to its choice of leadership structure.


    Attendance at Annual Meetings

    The Board of Directors encourages all directors to attend the Annual Meetings, if practicable. All of our directors attended the 20172019 Annual Meeting, and we anticipate that all of our directors will attend the 20182020 Annual Meeting.


    42


    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

    The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of March 14, 2018,April 7, 2020, by (a) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (b) each Named Executive Officer of the Company, (c) each director and director nominee of the Company and (d) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each person or entity named below is 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202.


    All information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock has been furnished by or on behalf of the stockholders and is as of March 14, 2018.16, 2020. For each entity included in the table below, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares reported as beneficially owned by such entity by the 175,556,184138,103,951 shares of common stockCommon Stock outstanding on March 14, 2018.

    April 7, 2020.
     
     Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock 
     
     Number of Shares Percentage of Class 

    5% Stockholders

           

    YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP(1)

      20,340,747  11.6%

    Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P.(2). 

      17,554,262  10.0%

    Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P.(3). 

      7,700,358  4.4%

    Yorktown Energy Partners XI, L.P.(4). 

      4,309,079  2.5%

    BlackRock Inc.(5)

      13,009,290  7.4%

    Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC(6)

      10,510,377  6.0%

    FMR LLC(7)

      9,620,865  5.5%

    The Vanguard Group(8)

      8,764,518  5.0%

    Directors and Named Executive Officers:

           

    Mark A. Erickson(9)

      5,714,079  3.3%

    Matthew R. Owens(10)

      4,002,178  2.3%

    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.(11)

      2,524,680  1.4%

    Tom L. Brock(12)

      429,484  0.2%

    Eric J. Christ(13)

      380,928  0.2%

    John S. Gaensbauer(14)

      113,178  * 

    Peter A. Leidel(14)

      133,916  * 

    Marvin M. Chronister(14)

      83,916  * 

    Patrick O'Brien(14)

      157,851  * 

    Wayne M. Murdy(14)

      133,916  * 

    Donald L. Evans(14)

      133,916  * 

    Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (11 total):

      13,808,042  7.9%


    Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock
    Number of SharesPercentage of Class
    5% Stockholders
    YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP(1)20,340,74714.7 %
    Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P.(2)17,554,26212.7 %
    Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P.(3)7,700,3585.6 %
    Yorktown Energy Partners XI, L.P.(4)4,309,0793.1 %
    BlackRock, Inc.(5)12,531,9319.1 %
    Morgan Stanley(6)11,670,0228.5 %
    Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC(7)10,746,9547.8 %
    Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(8)7,903,1825.7 %
    Directors and Named Executive Officers:
    Thomas B. Tyree, Jr.(9)1,250,0000.9 %
    Matthew R. Owens(10)5,181,7983.8 %
    Tom L. Brock(11)452,9470.3 %
    Eric J. Christ(12)444,4590.3 %
    Marianella Foschi(13)89,450 
    John S. Gaensbauer(14)153,8340.1 %
    Peter A. Leidel(14)174,5720.1 %
    Marvin M. Chronister(14)124,572 
    Patrick O’Brien(14)198,5070.1 %
    Wayne M. Murdy(14)174,5720.1 %
    Audrey Robertson(14)75,000 
    Mark A. Erickson(15)6,841,2365.0 %
    Russell T. Kelley, Jr.(16)3,178,9732.3 %
    Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (11 total):8,319,7116.0 %
    ___________________________
    (1)
    YT Extraction Company LP is the sole general partner of YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP. YT Extraction Associates LLC is the sole general partner of YT Extraction Company LP. As a result, YT Extraction Associates LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote or to dispose or direct the disposition of the common stockCommon Stock owned by YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP. YT Extraction Company LP and YT Extraction Associates LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP in excess of their pecuniary interest therein. Peter A. Leidel is a manager of YT Extraction Associates LLC. Mr. Leidel disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP. The address for YT Extraction Co Investment Partners, LP is 410 Park Avenue, 19 Floor, New York, New York 10022.

    (2)
    Yorktown X Company LP is the sole general partner of Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Associates LLC is the sole general partner of Yorktown X Company LP. As a result,
    43


      Yorktown X Associates LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote or to dispose or direct the disposition of the common stock owned by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Company LP and Yorktown X Associates LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of the common stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. in excess of their pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Leidel is a manager of Yorktown X Associates LLC. Mr. Leidel disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. The address for Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. is 410 Park Avenue, 19 Floor, New York, New York 10022.

    (3)

    (2)Yorktown X Company LP is the sole general partner of Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Associates LLC is the sole general partner of Yorktown X Company LP. As a result, Yorktown X Associates LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote or to dispose or direct the disposition of the common stockCommon Stock owned by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Company LP and Yorktown X Associates LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. in excess of their pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Leidel is a manager of Yorktown X Associates LLC. Mr. Leidel disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. The address for Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. is 410 Park Avenue, 19 Floor, New York, New York 10022.

    (3)Yorktown X Company LP is the sole general partner of Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Associates LLC is the sole general partner of Yorktown X Company LP. As a result, Yorktown X Associates LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote or to dispose or direct the disposition of the Common Stock owned by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. Yorktown X Company LP and Yorktown X Associates LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of the Common Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. in excess of their pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Leidel is a manager of Yorktown X Associates LLC. Mr. Leidel disclaims beneficial ownership of the Common Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. The address for Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. is 410 Park Avenue, 19 Floor, New York, New York 10022.
    (4)
    Yorktown IX Company LP is the sole general partner of Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P. Yorktown IX Associates LLC is the sole general partner of Yorktown IX Company LP. As a result, Yorktown IX Associates LLC may be deemed to share the power to vote or direct the vote or to dispose or direct the disposition of the common stockCommon Stock owned by Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P. Yorktown IX Company LP and Yorktown IX Associates LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P. in excess of their pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Leidel is a manager of Yorktown IX Associates LLC. Mr. Leidel disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stockCommon Stock held by Yorktown Energy Partners IX, L.P. The address for Yorktown Energy Partners X, L.P. is 410 Park Avenue, 19 Floor, New York, New York 10022.

    (5)
    The registered holders of the referenced shares are funds and accounts managed by investment adviser subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock, Inc. is the ultimate parent holding company of such investment adviser entities. Pursuant to the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2018,10, 2020, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 11,533,37512,306,211 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 13,009,290 shares of Common Stock.12,531,931 shares. The principal address of such funds and accounts and such investment adviser subsidiariesBlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

    (6)
    Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC is a Delaware limited liability company that is owned by certain investment funds affiliated with OZ Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("OZ Management"). OZ Management's sole general partner is Och-Ziff Holding Corporation ("OZHC"), a Delaware corporation, whose sole stockholder is Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC ("OZM"), a Delaware limited liability company. Each of OZ Management, OZHC, OZM and Daniel S. Och, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of OZHC and the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and an Executive Managing Director of OZM, may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the common stock held by Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC. Pursuant to the Schedule 13G filed by Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC and its affiliates with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2017, Bronco Investments II (EQ) LLC has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,191,950 shares of Common Stock, Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 10,510,377 shares of Common Stock, and OZ Management, OZHC, OZM, and Daniel S. Och have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 16,702,327 shares of Common Stock. The address for Bronco Investments (EQ), LLC and its affiliates is 9 West 57th Street, 39th Floor, New York, New York 10019.

    Table of Contents(6)

    (7)
    Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Pursuant to the Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLCMorgan Stanley with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2018, FMR LLC2020, Morgan Stanley has soleshared voting power with respect to 3,641,38011,669,897 shares and soleshared dispositive power with respect to 9,620,865 shares of Common Stock.11,670,022 shares. The principal address of FMR LLCMorgan Stanley is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

    (8)
    1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036.
    (7)Pursuant to athe Schedule 13G filed by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 2020, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC has shared voting power with respect to 10,718,476 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 10,746,954 shares. The Vanguard Groupprincipal address of Morgan Stanley is 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282.
    (8)Pursuant to the Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2018, The Vanguard Group12, 2020, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting and dispositive power over 66,202with respect to these shares. The address for Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.
    (9)Includes 1,250,000 unvested RSUs.
    (10)Includes 1,837,755 shares sharedof Common Stock held by OFI Properties LLC. Mr. Owens has voting power over 6,800 shares, soleand dispositive power over 8,701,391these shares but disclaims beneficial ownership over these shares in excess of his pecuniary interest in these shares. OFI Properties LLC is an entity owned by Mr. Owens. Includes (i) 80,522 unvested restricted stock units and shared dispositive power over 63,127(ii) 1,631,924 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $18.72. Includes 347,682 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the “PSAs”). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock.Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.
    (11)Includes (i) 76,687 unvested RSUs and (ii) 62,821 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.53. Includes 165,563 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the “PSAs”). The addressnumber of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award
    44




    agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.
    (12)Includes (i) 114,187 unvested RSUs and (ii) 62,821 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.53. Includes 165,563 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the “PSAs”). The Vanguard Groupnumber of PSAs disclosed is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

    (9)
    the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.
    (13)Included 38,232 unvested RSUs.
    (14)Includes 31,553 unvested RSUs.
    (15)Includes 271,956 shares of common stockCommon Stock held by Jane M. Erickson, 2,046,449 shares of common stockCommon Stock held by MAE Investment Properties 2016, LLC, 271,957 shares of common stockCommon Stock held by JME Investment Properties 2016, LLC and 81 shares of common stockCommon Stock held by MAE Holdings 2011 LLC. Mr. Erickson has voting and dispositive power over these shares but disclaims beneficial ownership over these shares in excess of his pecuniary interest in these shares. MAE Investment Properties 2016, LLC, and MAE Holdings 2011 LLC are entities owned by Mr. Erickson. Does not reflect 1,712,045 shares of common stock held by Extraction Employee Incentive, LLC an entity in which Mr. Erickson owns a membership interest. Includes (i) 375,000219,836 unvested restricted stock units and (ii) 590,0431,770,130 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $18.47.$18.72. Includes 1,013,887711,921 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the "PSAs"“PSAs”). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.

    (10)
    (16)Includes 1,930,277 shares of common stock held by OFI Properties LLC. Mr. Owens has voting and dispositive power over these shares but disclaims beneficial ownership over these shares in excess of his pecuniary interest in these shares. OFI Properties LLC is an entity owned by Mr. Owens. Does not reflect 1,712,045 shares of common stock held by Extraction Employee Incentive, LLC, an entity in which Mr. Owens owns a membership interest. Includes (i) 375,000 unvested restricted stock units and (ii) 543,9741,407,849 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $18.72.$18.67. Includes 495,154347,682 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the "PSAs"“PSAs”). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.

    (11)
    Does not reflect 1,712,045 shares of common stock held by Extraction Employee Incentive, LLC, an entity in which Mr. Kelley owns a membership interest. Includes (i) 340,569 unvested RSUs and (ii) 421,749 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $18.64. Includes 495,154 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the "PSAs"). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements

    Table of Contents

      and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.

    (12)
    Includes (i) 145,259 unvested RSUs and (ii) 20,940 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.53. Includes 235,788 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the "PSAs"). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.

    (13)
    Includes (i) 106,559 unvested RSUs and (ii) 20,940 shares that may be acquired subject to options exercisable within 60 days at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.53. Includes 235,788 shares of restricted stock subject to performance vesting (the "PSAs"). The number of PSAs disclosed is the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that can be earned under the terms of the applicable award agreements and the final number of shares of Common Stock received by the executive officer is not determinable at this time.

    (14)
    Includes 8,916 unvested restricted stock units.

    *
    Less than 0.1%.

    45


    SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

    Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership of our equity securities and reports of changes in ownership of our equity securities with the SEC. Such persons are also required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2019, except for the Form 4 filings related to the annual grant of restricted stock units to our non-executive directors made on May 15, 2019, which were filed late due to administrative oversight, all Section 16(a) reporting persons complied with all applicable filing requirements in a timely manner, except that Mr. Gaensbauer filed a late amended Form 4 on May 24, 2017 regarding the receipt of shares by Sierra Partners LLC, of which Mr. Gaensbauer is a partner, in connection with the merger of Extraction Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC with and into the Company at the closing of our initial public offering. In addition, and based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, Mr. Gaensbauer and Mr. O'Brien filed late amended Form 4s on March 23, 2018 regarding their purchase of 3,000 shares and 7,000 shares, respectively, in connection with the directed share program of our initial public offering on October 26, 2016.

    manner.

    46


    TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

    Policies and Procedures for Review of Related Party Transactions

    A "Related“Related Party Transaction"Transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we or any of our subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, the amount of which involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

            "Related Person"


    “Related Person” means:


    any person who is, or at any time during the applicable period was, one of our executive officers or one of our directors;


    any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities;


    any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law of a director, executive officer or a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director, executive officer or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock; and


    any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.


    Our board of directors adopted a written related party transactions policy in connection with the IPO. Pursuant to this policy, our Audit Committee will review all material facts of all Related Party Transactions. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, (a) whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances, (b) the extent of the Related Person'sPerson’s interest in the transaction and (c) whether the transaction is material to the Company.


    Historical Transactions with Affiliates

    Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement

    In connection with the closing of the IPO, we entered into a registration rights agreement (the "Existing“Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement"Agreement”) with Yorktown'sYorktown’s funds and certain of our existing equity holders. The Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement provides for customary rights for these stockholders to demand that we file a resale shelf registration statement and certain piggyback rights in connection with the registration of securities. In addition, the agreement grants these stockholders customary rights to participate in certain underwritten offerings of our common stockCommon Stock that we may conduct.


    Demand Rights

    Subject to certain limitations, the equity holders party to the Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement have the right to require us by written notice to prepare and file a registration statement registering the offer and sale of a certain number of their shares of our common stock.Common Stock. We are required to provide notice of the request to certain other holders of our common stockCommon Stock who may, in certain circumstances, participate in the registration. Subject to certain exceptions, we will not be obligated to effect a demand registration (a) on or before the date that is twelve months after the closing of the IPO, (b) on or before 180 days after any other registered underwritten offering of our


    Table of Contents

    equity securities, or (c) if we are not otherwise eligible at such time to file a registration statement on Form S-3 (or any applicable successor form).



    47




    Piggyback Rights

    Subject to certain exceptions, if at any time we propose to register an offering of equity securities or conduct an underwritten offering, whether or not for our own account and subject to the ability of the holders of 75% of the shares to waive such a right, then we must notify the equity holders party to the Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement of such proposal to allow them to include a specified number of their shares of our common stockCommon Stock in that registration statement or underwritten offering, as applicable.


    Conditions and Limitations; Expenses

    These registration rights are subject to certain conditions and limitations, including the right of the underwriters to limit the number of shares to be included in a registration and our right to delay a registration statement under certain circumstances. We will generally pay all registration expenses in connection with our obligations under the Existing Owners Registration Rights Agreement, regardless of whether a registration statement is filed or becomes effective.


    Series A Preferred Registration Rights Agreement

    The Series B Preferred Units converted in connection with the closing of the IPO into 185,280 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series“Series A Preferred Stock"Stock”). In connection with the sale of the Series B Preferred Units, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the "Registration“Registration Rights Agreement"Agreement”) with the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock (the "Series“Series A Preferred Holders"Holders”) pursuant to which we agreed to file thisfiled a shelf registration statement within 45 days of the closing of the IPO registering the sale of the shares of common stockCommon Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock. Additionally, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Series A Preferred Holders will have certain piggyback rights under such agreement, which will allow the holders the option to include a specified number of shares of common stockCommon Stock they receive following the conversion of their Series A Preferred Stock in any underwritten offering of our equity securities.

    Senior Notes

            Several lenders of our 2021, 2024 and 2016 Senior Notes are also 5% stockholders of the Company. As of the initial issuance in July 2016 of the $550.0 million principal amount on the 2021 Senior Notes, 5% stockholders purchased $63.5 million of notes. As of the initial issuance in August 2017 of the $400.0 million principal amount on the 2024 Senior Notes, 5% stockholders purchased $54.9 million of notes. As of the initial issuance in January 2018 of the $750.0 million principal amount on the 2026 Senior Notes, 5% stockholders purchased $56.2 million. In January 2018, we utilized net proceeds from the offering of the 2026 Senior Notes to tender for our 2021 Senior Notes and any 2021 Senior Notes not tendered were redeemed in February 2018; accordingly, the 2021 Senior Notes held by 5% stockholders were repurchased by the Company.

    Employees
    Employees

    Mr. Troy Owens, brother of Mr. Matthew R. Owens, our President and a member of our Board of Directors, is employed by us as an engineer. Consistent with market compensation for his services, Mr. Troy Owens received approximately $171,000$0.2 million in aggregate cash compensation relating to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2019. In addition, Mr. Troy Owens received certain long-term incentives during the same period in the form of restricted stock units that vest over a period of three years.


    Table of Contents




    48




    PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act"“Dodd-Frank Act”), the stockholders of the Company are entitled to vote at the annual meeting on the compensation of the Company'sCompany’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and accompanying compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the stockholder vote on executive compensation is an advisory vote only and is not binding on the Company or the Board of Directors.


    Although the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors value the opinions of the stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.


    As described in detail under the heading "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis," our executive compensation program aligns with our business strategy, focuses on long-term value creation for our stockholders and delivers pay relative to our performance, which will attract and retain experienced, talented executives to ensure the Company'sCompany’s success. Please read the "Compensation“Compensation Discussion and Analysis"Analysis” beginning on page 1413 for additional details about our executive compensation program, including information about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers during 2017.

    2019.


    During 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee implemented a newadministered an annual cash bonus program and long-term equity incentive program, in both cases to ensure that such programs are competitively structured, are aligned with our short and long-term strategic goals and reflect a strong pay-for-performance orientation.


    Below are the key actions taken and decisions made regarding the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation program in 2017,2019, as approved by the Compensation Committee with input from its independent compensation consultant:


    implementedMaintained the base salaries of our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer at existing levels in place since 2017. Through the end of 2019, the base salaries for our President and Chief Financial Officer have remained unchanged since our initial public offering in 2016;

    In the third quarter of 2019, the Board amended the Company’s capital budget to execute upon a newmore measured pace of development to focus on generating free cash bonus program, pursuantflow and to which ourdeemphasize the Company’s production growth. While the 2019 Short-Term Cash Incentive Program would have allowed the Compensation Committee evaluated the Company'sability to adjust the metrics in the program to account for the revised budget, due to the negative stock price performance for 2017 against pre-established qualitative and quantitative goals in order to determine the value of the cash bonuses paidCompany during 2019, the Compensation Committee elected not to each of our Named Executive Officers;adjust the impacted metrics; and



    implemented a newThe Compensation Committee designed the performance-based long-term equity incentive award structure comprisedawards issued in 2019 to be a mix of PSAs that vest based onboth share-settled and cash-settled awards to mitigate potentially extensive dilution to the Company's relative TSR compared to a group of peer companies over a three-year performance period and time-basedCompany’s Common Stock given the decline the Company’s stock options awards that vest over a three-year service period; andprice.


    adopted stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors and executives, including our Named Executive Officers.

    Our Compensation Committee and our Board have determined that the Company'sCompany’s Named Executive Officer compensation aligns with our business strategy, focuses on long-term value creation for our stockholders and delivers competitive pay relative to our performance, and therefore the Board recommends that you vote "FOR"“FOR” the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the Company'sCompany’s Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed pursuant to the SEC'sSEC’s compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure shall include the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the related tables and disclosure in this proxy statement)Proxy Statement).


    Vote Required

    The advisory vote on executive compensation in this Proposal THREE requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast FOR or AGAINST and abstentions with respect to this Proposal THREE will be counted as shares entitled to vote on the Proposal. For these purposes, brokers have


    Table of Contents

    the discretion to vote if they do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner. A vote to ABSTAIN will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Proposal.


    49




    Recommendation

    The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the executive compensation of the Named Executive Officers.


    Table of Contents


    50




    PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF STOCKHOLDER VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONTO APPROVE THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

            Under

    We are seeking stockholder approval for a proposal to adopt an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to permit us to effect the Dodd-Frank Act,Reverse Stock Split of our issued and outstanding Common Stock by a ratio that will be determined by the stockholdersBoard and that will be within a range of 1-for-10 and 1-for-200, if the Board determines, in its sole discretion, at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the Company are entitledand its stockholders.

    The form of the amendment to vote atour certificate of incorporation to effect the annual meeting regarding whetherReverse Stock Split is set forth on Appendix A. Approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation should occur every one, twoproposal would permit (but not require) the Board to effect the Reverse Stock Split by a ratio of not less than 1-for-10 and not more than 1-for-200, with the exact ratio to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, provided that the Board must determine to effect the Reverse Stock Split and such amendment must be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware no later than the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting. The exact ratio of the Reverse Stock Split will be determined by the Board prior to the effective time of the split and will be publicly announced by the Company prior to the effective time of the split. We believe that enabling the Board to set the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split within the stated range will provide us with the flexibility to implement the Reverse Stock Split in a manner designed to maximize the anticipated benefits for our stockholders. In determining a ratio of the Reverse Stock Split, if any, following the receipt of stockholder approval, the Board may consider, among other things, factors such as:

    the existing and expected marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock;

    the historical trading prices and trading volume of our Common Stock;

    listing requirements of NASDAQ or three years. Stockholders shall also have other applicable exchange or trading venues;

    the option to abstain from votingnumber of shares of our Common Stock outstanding;

    the then-prevailing trading price and trading volume of our Common Stock and the anticipated or actual impact of the Reverse Stock Split on the matter. Pursuanttrading price and trading volume for our Common Stock;

    the anticipated impact of the Reverse Stock Split on our ability to raise additional financing;

    the Dodd-Frank Act, anticipated impact of a particular ratio on our ability to reduce administrative and transactional costs; and

    the stockholder voteoutlook for oil price volatility and other prevailing general market and economic conditions.

    The Board reserves the right to not effect a Reverse Stock Split if it determines, in its sole discretion, that the Reverse Stock Split is no longer in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

    Depending on the frequencyratio for the Reverse Stock Split determined by the Board, no less than every 10 and no more than every 200 shares of Common Stock will be combined into one share of Common Stock. The amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the advisory vote on executive compensation is an advisory vote only, and it isReverse Stock Split will not binding onchange the authorized number of shares of preferred stock of the Company, or the par value of the Company’s Common Stock or preferred stock. Except for the shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock or the exercise of outstanding awards under our equity compensation plans, we do not currently have any plans, proposals or arrangement to issue any of our authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.

    Background and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split; Potential Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split

    On March 30, 2020, we received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC notifying us that for the 30 consecutive business days ending March 27, 2020, the bid price of our Common Stock had closed below $1.00 per share, the minimum closing bid price required by the continued listing requirements of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the “Minimum Bid Requirement”). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 calendar days, or until September 28, 2020, to regain compliance
    51




    with the Minimum Bid Requirement. To regain compliance, the closing bid price of our Common Stock must be at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this 180-day period.

    The Reverse Stock Split proposal is part of our plan to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. If the price of our Common Stock remains below the threshold required by the Minimum Bid Requirement, and assuming stockholders have approved the Reverse Stock Split, we may implement the Reverse Stock Split, utilizing a ratio the Board believes will position us to maintain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement. If we are not able to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Requirement in the applicable time period, our Common Stock will become subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

    We believe that the Reverse Stock Split, by increasing our stock price, will make our Common Stock more attractive to a broader range of Directors.

            Althoughinstitutional and other investors, as we have been advised that the vote is non-binding,current market price of our Common Stock may affect its acceptability to certain institutional investors, professional investors and other members of the Compensation Committeeinvesting public. Many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. In addition, some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Moreover, because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current average price per share of Common Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. We believe that the Reverse Stock Split will make our Common Stock a more attractive and cost effective investment for investors.


    In addition to increasing the price of our Common Stock, we believe that a Reverse Stock Split will provide the Company and its stockholders with other benefits. Currently, the fees that we pay to list our shares on the NASDAQ are based on the number of shares we have outstanding. Also, the fees that we pay for custody and clearing services, the fees that we pay to the SEC to register securities for issuance and the Boardcosts of Directorsour proxy solicitations are all based on or related to the number of shares being held, cleared or registered, as applicable. Reducing the number of shares that are outstanding and that will be issued in the future may reduce the amount of fees and taxes that we pay to these organizations and agencies, as well as other organizations and agencies that levy charges based on the number of shares rather than the value the opinions of the stockholdersshares.

    Notwithstanding the decrease in the number of issued and will consideroutstanding shares following the outcomeReverse Stock Split, the Board does not intend for this transaction to be the first step in a series of plans or proposals of a “going private transaction” within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 of the vote when determiningExchange Act.

    Certain Risks Associated with the frequencyReverse Stock Split

    There can be no assurance that the total market capitalization of our Common Stock after the implementation of the stockholder voteReverse Stock Split will be equal to or greater than the total market capitalization before the Reverse Stock Split or that the per share market price of our common stock following the Reverse Stock Split will increase in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Also, we cannot assure you that the Reverse Stock Split would lead to a sustained increase in the trading price of our Common Stock. The trading price of our Common Stock may change due to a variety of other factors, including our ability to successfully accomplish our business goals, market conditions and the market perception of our business. You should also keep in mind that the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split does not have an effect on executive compensation.

            Ourthe actual or intrinsic value of our business or a stockholder's proportional ownership in the Company (subject to the treatment of fractional shares). However, should the overall value of our Common Stock decline after the proposed Reverse Stock Split, then the actual or intrinsic value of the shares of our Common Stock held by you will also proportionately decrease as a result of the overall decline in value.


    Further, the liquidity of our Common Stock may be harmed by the proposed Reverse Stock Split given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split, particularly if the expected increase in stock price as a result of the Reverse Stock Split is not sustained. For instance, the proposed Reverse Stock Split may increase the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our Common Stock,
    52




    creating the potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting sales. If we effect the Reverse Stock Split, the resulting per-share stock price may nevertheless fail to attract institutional investors and may not satisfy the investing guidelines of such investors and, consequently, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may not improve.

    While our Board of Directors has proposed the Reverse Stock Split to bring the average closing price of our Common Stock back above $1.00 per share in order to meet the requirements of the Minimum Bid Requirement, there is no guarantee that the price of our Common Stock will not decrease in the future, or that our Common Stock will remain in compliance with the NASDAQ continued listing standards. Additionally, there can be no guarantee that the average closing price per share of our Common Stock will remain at or above $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, whether following the Reverse Stock Split or otherwise, which is required to cure our current NASDAQ continued listing standard deficiency.

    Determination of the Specific Reverse Stock Split Ratio

    If the Board chooses to implement the Reverse Stock Split, the Board’s selection of the specific reverse stock split ratio will be based primarily on the price level of our Common Stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split and the expected stability of the price level of our Common Stock going forward. We expect that the primary focus of the Board in determining the reverse stock split ratio will be to select a ratio that it believes is likely to result in increased marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock and may encourage interest and trading in our Common Stock for the reasons discussed under “Background and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split; Potential Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split” above.

    We believe that granting the Board the authority to set the ratio for the Reverse Stock Split is essential because it provides the Board with the maximum flexibility to react to changing market conditions and to therefore act in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. If the Board implements the Reverse Stock Split, the Company will make a public announcement regarding the determination of the exact reverse stock split ratio.

    Procedure for Implementing the Reverse Stock Split

    The Reverse Stock Split would become effective upon the filing of a certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The exact timing of the filing of the certificate of amendment that will effect the Reverse Stock Split will be determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, provided that an annual non-binding advisory votein no event shall the filling of the certificate of amendment effecting the Reverse Stock Split occur after the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting.

    Amendment Effective Time

    The effective date of the Reverse Stock Split will be the date on executive compensationwhich the certificate of amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the amendment contemplated by this proposal is accepted and recorded by the Delaware Secretary of State (subject to any specific future time of effectiveness stated therein) in accordance with Section 103 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The exact timing of the filing of the amendment will allowbe determined by the Board based on its determination that such action will be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders as described herein. Except as explained herein with respect to fractional shares, on the effective date of the amendment to effect the Reverse Stock Split, shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto will be combined and converted, automatically and without any action on the part of the stockholders, into new shares of the Common Stock in accordance with the reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board within the limits set forth in this proposal.

    Reservation of Right to Abandon Reverse Stock Split

    The Board reserves the right, notwithstanding stockholder approval of this Proposal FOUR and without further action by the stockholders, to elect not to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split if, at any time prior to filing the amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split, or, in the event that the amendment is not effective until a later time, such later time, the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that it is no
    53




    longer in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of our stockholders to provide timely, direct input on our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed inproceed with the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with our efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our shareholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters.

            You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to this Proposal FOUR.

    Vote Required

            The frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote that receives the greatest number of votes—every one year, every two years or every three years—Reverse Stock Split. Such determination will be based upon factors the frequency thatBoard deems appropriate, including the stockholders approve, on a non-binding advisory basis. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have anyCompany’s then current stock price, the existing and expected marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock, prevailing market conditions and the likely effect on the outcomemarket price of Proposal FOUR. This advisory voteour Common Stock. If a certificate of amendment effecting the Reverse Stock Split has not been filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on or before the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, the Board will be deemed to have abandoned the Reverse Stock Split.


    Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of Outstanding Common Stock

    After the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split, each holder of our Common Stock will own fewer shares of Common Stock and, if “Proposal FIVE—To Approve the Authorized Share Reduction” is approved by the stockholders, the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock will be reduced by a ratio equal to 1-for-two-thirds of the denominator of the reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board within the limits set forth in this proposal. See “Proposal FIVE—To Approve the Authorized Share Reduction—Effects of the Authorized Share Reduction” for an illustrative example of the effect of both the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction on the frequencynumber of authorized, issued and outstanding and available shares of Common Stock.

    The Reverse Stock Split will affect all holders of our Common Stock uniformly and will not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the Company, except that, as described herein under “Fractional Shares,” record holders of Common Stock otherwise entitled to a fractional share as a result of the Say-on-Pay voteReverse Stock Split will receive cash in lieu of such fractional share. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split will not affect any stockholder’s proportionate voting power (subject to the treatment of fractional shares). For example, a holder of 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split would continue to hold 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately after the Reverse Stock Split (subject to adjustment for any payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares).

    The number of stockholders of record will not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split (except to the extent that any stockholders holds only a fractional share interest and receives cash for such interest after the Reverse Stock Split).

    The Reverse Stock Split may result in some stockholders owning “odd lots” of less than 100 shares of Common Stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots may be higher than the costs of transactions in “round lots” of even multiples of 100 shares.

    After the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, our Common Stock will have a new Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures (CUSIP) number, which is a number used to identify our equity securities, and stock certificates with the older CUSIP numbers will need to be exchanged for stock certificates with the new CUSIP numbers by following the procedures described below. After the Reverse Stock Split, we will continue to be subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act.

    Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock

    Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the holder’s option at any time, into approximately 61.9195 shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment. If the Board elects to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split, the conversion rate will be adjusted based on a ratio of the number of Common Stock outstanding immediately after the Reverse Stock Split to the number of Common Stock outstanding immediately before the Reverse Stock Split, with such adjustment to take effect immediately after 9:00 a.m., New York City time, on the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split. If the Board elects the 1-for-10 ratio and assuming the number of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date does not change, the new conversion rate would be 6.1920 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. If the Board elects the 1-for-200 ratio and assuming the number of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date does not change, the new conversion rate would be 0.3096 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. Any other ratio selected within such range would result in a conversion rate of between 6.1920 and 0.3096 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock.

    54




    Authorized Shares of Common Stock

    Unless “Proposal FIVE—To Approve the Authorized Share Reduction” is approved by the stockholders, the Reverse Stock Split will not change the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock under our amended certificate of incorporation. Because the number of issued Common Stock will decrease as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of Common Stock available for issuance will increase. Currently, we are authorized to issue up to a total of 950,000,000 shares of capital stock, comprising 900,000,000 Common Stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Except for the shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of outstanding awards under our equity compensation plans and conversion of our preferred stock, we do not currently have any plans, proposals or arrangement to issue any of our authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.

    By increasing the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, the Reverse Stock Split could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect, although this is not binding onthe intent of the Board. For example, it may be possible for the Board to delay or impede a takeover or transfer of control of the Company by causing such additional authorized but unissued shares to be issued to holders who might side with the Board in opposing a takeover bid that the Board determines is not in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. The Reverse Stock Split, therefore, may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover attempts. By potentially discouraging initiation of any such unsolicited takeover attempts the Reverse Stock Split may limit the opportunity for our stockholders to dispose of their shares at the higher price generally available in takeover attempts or that may be available under a merger proposal. The Reverse Stock Split may have the effect of permitting our current management, including the current Board, to retain its position, and place it in a better position to resist changes that stockholders may wish to make if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of the Company’s business. However, the Board is not aware of any attempt to take control of the Company, and the Board has not approved the Reverse Stock Split with the intent that it be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.

    Exchange of Stock Certificates

    If the Reverse Stock Split is effected, stockholders holding certificated shares (i.e., shares represented by one or more physical stock certificates) will take into accountbe requested to exchange their old stock certificate(s) (“Old Certificate(s)”) for shares held electronically in book-entry form through the Depository Trust Company’s Direct Registration System representing the appropriate number of whole shares of our Common Stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split. This means that, instead of receiving a new stock certificate, stockholders holding certificated shares prior to the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split will receive a statement of holding indicating the number of shares held by them electronically in book-entry form after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders of record upon the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split will be furnished the necessary materials and instructions for the surrender and exchange of their Old Certificate(s) at the appropriate time by our Transfer Agent. Stockholders will not have to pay any transfer fee or other fee in connection with such exchange. As soon as practicable after the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, our Transfer Agent will send a transmittal letter to each stockholder advising such holder of the procedure for surrendering Old Certificate(s) in exchange for new shares held in book-entry form. Your Old Certificate(s) representing pre-split shares cannot be used for either transfers or deliveries. Accordingly, you must exchange your Old Certificate(s) in order to effect transfers or deliveries of your shares.

    YOU SHOULD NOT SEND YOUR OLD CERTIFICATES NOW. YOU SHOULD SEND THEM ONLY AFTER YOU RECEIVE THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FROM OUR TRANSFER AGENT.

    As soon as practicable after the surrender to our Transfer Agent of any Old Certificate(s), together with a properly completed and duly executed transmittal letter and any other documents our Transfer Agent may specify, our Transfer Agent will have its records adjusted to reflect that the shares represented by such Old Certificate(s) are held in book-entry form in the name of such person.

    Until surrendered as contemplated herein, a stockholder’s Old Certificate(s) shall be deemed at and after the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split to represent the number of whole shares of our Common Stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split.

    55




    Any stockholder whose Old Certificate(s) have been lost, destroyed or stolen will be entitled to new shares in book-entry form only after complying with the requirements that we and our Transfer Agent customarily apply in connection with lost, stolen or destroyed certificates.

    No service charges, brokerage commissions or transfer taxes shall be payable by any holder of any Old Certificate, except that if any book-entry shares are to be issued in a name other than that in which the Old Certificate(s) are registered, it will be a condition of such issuance that (1) the person requesting such issuance must pay to us any applicable transfer taxes or establish to our satisfaction that such taxes have been paid or are not payable, (2) the transfer complies with all applicable federal and state securities laws, and (3) the surrendered certificate is properly endorsed and otherwise in proper form for transfer.

    Any stockholder who wants to continue holding certificated shares may request new certificate(s) from our Transfer Agent.

    Stockholders who hold only uncertificated shares, either as direct or beneficial owners, will have their holdings electronically adjusted by our Transfer Agent and, for beneficial owners, by their brokers or banks which hold in “street name” for their benefit, as the case may be to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

    Fractional Shares

    Fractional shares will not be issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who would otherwise hold fractional shares of our Common Stock as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will be entitled to receive cash (without interest and subject to applicable withholding taxes) in lieu of such fractional shares equal to such fraction multiplied by the average of the closing sales price of the Common Stock during regular trading hours for the five consecutive days immediately preceding the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split (with such average closing sales prices being adjusted to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split). The Company will not receive any proceeds from any such sales. The ownership of a fractional interest will not give the holder any voting, dividend or other rights, except to receive the above-described cash payment.

    Stockholders should be aware that, under the escheat laws of the various jurisdictions where stockholders reside, where we are domiciled and where the funds will be deposited, sums due for fractional interests resulting from the Reverse Stock Split that are not timely claimed after the effective time in accordance with applicable law may be required to be paid to the designated agent for each such jurisdiction. Thereafter, if applicable, stockholders otherwise entitled to receive such funds, but who do not receive them due, for example, to their failure to timely comply with our Transfer Agent’s instructions (described herein), may have to seek to obtain them directly from the state to which they were paid.

    No Appraisal Rights

    No action is proposed herein for which the laws of the State of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide a right to our stockholders to dissent and obtain appraisal of, or payment for, such stockholders' Common Stock.

    Effect of the Reverse Stock Split on Equity Compensation Plans and Awards

    As noted above under “Equity Compensation Plan Information,” all of our outstanding equity compensation plan awards have been issued pursuant to the LTIP.

    Under the LTIP, in connection with any Reverse Stock Split, the following adjustments will occur automatically, with the Compensation Committee to make all determinations, perform all acts, and exercise all powers and authority necessary or advisable to implement such adjustments: (i) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available under the LTIP or in connection with LTIP awards will be decreased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split; (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock that may be acquired under any then outstanding LTIP award will be decreased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split; and (iii) the price (including the exercise price) for each share of Common Stock subject to then outstanding LTIP awards will be
    56




    increased in proportion to the ratio of the Reverse Stock Split, without changing the aggregate purchase price or value as to which outstanding LTIP awards remain exercisable or subject to restrictions, subject to any rounding as described below.

    No fractional interest will be issued under the LTIP on account of the Reverse Stock Split. In connection with the proportionate adjustments described in the preceding paragraph, the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of outstanding LTIP awards will be rounded down to the nearest whole share and the exercise prices will be rounded up to the nearest cent, and no cash or other payments will be made in respect of such rounding.

    The Compensation Committee’s determination as to the implementation of the adjustments noted above will be final, binding, and conclusive. The Committee will promptly provide each LTIP participant with a notice setting forth, in reasonable detail, the event requiring adjustments (i.e., the Reverse Stock Split), the amount of the adjustments, the method by which the adjustments were calculated, and the change in price and the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each LTIP award after giving effect to the adjustments.

    Regulatory Effects

    The Common Stock is currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, and the Company is subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The Reverse Stock Split will not affect the registration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act or the Company’s obligation to publicly file financial and other information with the SEC. If the Reverse Stock Split is implemented, the Common Stock will continue to trade on the NASDAQ under the symbol “XOG” (although the NASDAQ would likely add the letter “D” to the end of the trading symbol for a period of 20 trading days to indicate that the Reverse Stock Split has occurred).

    Interests of Certain Persons in the Proposal

    Certain of the Company’s officers and directors have an interest in this proposal as a result of their ownership of shares of stock of the Company, as set forth in the section entitled “Beneficial Ownership of Securities” below. However, the Company does not believe that its officers or directors have interests in the Reverse Stock Split that are different from or greater than those of any other stockholder of the Company.

    Accounting Matters

    The amendment to our certificate of incorporation will not affect the par value of our Common Stock per share, which will remain $0.01 per share. As a result, as of the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, the stated capital attributable to Common Stock and the additional paid-in capital on our balance sheet will, in total, not change due to the Reverse Stock Split. However, the allocation between the stated capital attributable to Common Stock and the additional paid-in capital on our balance sheet will change because there will be fewer shares of Common Stock outstanding. The stated capital attributable to Common Stock will decrease, and in turn, the stated capital attributable to the additional paid-in capital will increase. Further, reported per share net income or loss will be higher because there will be fewer shares of Common Stock outstanding.

    Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split

    The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the proposed Reverse Stock Split to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of our Common Stock. This discussion is based on the Tax Code, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, and published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in each case in effect as of the date of this proxy statement. These authorities may change or be subject to differing interpretations. Any such change or differing interpretation may be applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a U.S. Holder and affect the accuracy of this discussion.

    57




    We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS or an opinion from legal or tax counsel regarding the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below regarding the tax consequences of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.

    For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our Common Stock that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is or is treated as:

    an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

    a corporation (or any other entity or arrangement treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia;

    an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or

    a trust if (1) its administration is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and all of its substantial decisions are subject to the control of one or more “United States person” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Tax Code) or (2) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

    This discussion is limited to U.S. Holders who hold our Common Stock as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Tax Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to the particular circumstances of a U.S. Holder, including the impact of the alternative minimum tax or the Medicare contribution surtax on net investment income. In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to U.S. Holders that are subject to special rules, including banks and other financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, partnerships, S corporations, and other pass-through entities (and investors in such pass-through entities), insurance companies, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, mutual funds, dealers, brokers, or traders in securities, commodities, or currencies, traders in securities that elect a mark-to-market method of accounting, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax, holders who acquired Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options, through a qualified retirement plan, or otherwise as compensation, holders that actually or constructively own more than 5% of our outstanding stock, holders that hold Common Stock as part of a straddle, hedge, constructive sale, conversion, or integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders that are not U.S. Holders, and U.S. Holders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar.

    If a partnership (or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of Common Stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner, the activities of the partner and the partnership, and certain determinations made at the partner level. Accordingly, partnerships (and other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding Common Stock and the partners in such entities should consult their tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the proposed Reverse Stock Split to them.

    In addition, the following discussion does not address the U.S. federal estate and gift tax, or state, local and non-U.S. tax law consequences of the proposed Reverse Stock Split. Furthermore, the following discussion does not address any tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after or at the same time as the proposed Reverse Stock Split, whether or not they are in connection with the proposed Reverse Stock Split.

    ALL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSED REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ARISING UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL ESTATE OR GIFT TAX LAWS OR UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE INCOME TAX TREATY.

    58




    The proposed Reverse Stock Split should constitute a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code. As a result, a U.S. Holder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the proposed Reverse Stock Split for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share of our Common Stock, as discussed below. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the shares of Common Stock held immediately after the proposed Reverse Stock Split should equal the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of Common Stock held immediately before the Reverse Stock Split (reduced by the amount of such basis that is allocated to any fractional share of our Common Stock). The U.S. Holder’s holding period in the shares of Common Stock held immediately after the Reverse Stock Split should include the holding period in the shares of Common Stock held immediately before the Reverse Stock Split. U.S. Treasury regulations provide detailed rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period among shares of Common Stock which were acquired by a shareholder on different dates and at different prices. U.S. Holders of shares of our Common Stock acquired on different dates and at different prices should consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding period among such shares.

    A U.S. Holder that, pursuant to the proposed Reverse Stock Split, receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our Common Stock will be treated as having received the fractional share pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split and then as having exchanged the fractional share for cash. Accordingly, such U.S. Holder should recognize taxable gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received and the portion of such U.S. Holder’s aggregate adjusted tax basis in the shares of Common Stock surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share. Such capital gain or loss will be short-term with respect to shares of Common Stock that were held for one year or less at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split and long-term with respect to shares of Common Stock that were held for more than one year at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split.

    Payments of cash made in lieu of a fractional share of our Common Stock may, under certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup withholding. To avoid backup withholding, each U.S. Holder of our Common Stock that does not otherwise establish an exemption should furnish on applicable IRS forms its taxpayer identification number and comply with the applicable certification procedures.

    Backup withholding is not an additional tax and amounts withheld will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such U.S. Holder to a refund, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. U.S. Holders of our Common Stock should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to them.

    Vote Required

    Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote, when determiningeither in person or by proxy, of the frequencyholders of future Say-on-Pay votes.

    a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions, failing to vote, and “broker non-votes” will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the adoption of this proposal because the required vote is based on the number of shares outstanding rather than the number of votes cast.


    Recommendation
    Recommendation

    The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the frequencyapproval of "1 year"the Reverse Stock Split.



    59




    PROPOSAL FIVE: TO APPROVE THE AUTHORIZED SHARE REDUCTION

    General

    The Board has authorized, and recommends for approval by the shareholders, an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation that, if approved by the shareholders and filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, would reduce the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by a ratio equal to 1-for-two-thirds of the denominator of the ratio determined by the Board for the Reverse Stock Split described under “Proposal FOUR—To Approve the Reverse Stock Split.”

    This Proposal FIVE to approve the amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the Authorized Share Reduction is conditioned on the approval of the amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split. Therefore, if Proposal FOUR is not approved, then this Proposal FIVE will automatically be deemed to not have been approved, regardless of the number of shares actually voted “FOR” Proposal FIVE.

    If both Proposal FOUR and Proposal FIVE are approved by our shareholders, the Authorized Share Reduction will become effective upon filing the amendment to our certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. However, notwithstanding approval of the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction by the shareholders, the Board will have the sole authority to elect, at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, whether or not to amend our certificate of incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the Authorized Share Reduction.

    The text of the proposed amendment to our certificate of incorporation to effect the Authorized Share Reduction is included as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

    Reasons for the Authorized Share Reduction

    We currently have 900,000,000 authorized shares of Common Stock. The Board believes that it is in our best interests to decrease the authorized number of shares of Common Stock in connection with the Reverse Stock Split by a ratio equal to 1-for-two-thirds of the denominator of the reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board.

    Effects of the Authorized Share Reduction

    The decrease in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock would result in fewer shares of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock being available for future votes,issuance. This would decrease the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance for various purposes such as to raise capital or to make acquisitions. We believe, however, that after the proposed decrease, the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock remaining will be sufficient for such purposes.


    60




    For illustrative purposes only, the following table shows the approximate effect on our Common Stock of a non-binding advisory basis,1-for-10 and a 1-for-200 reverse stock split (as followed by the reduction in authorized shares), as of April 7, 2020:


    Number of Shares of Common Stock Prior to Reverse Stock SplitNumber of Shares of Common Stock After Reverse Stock Split and Authorized Share Reduction
    1:101:200
    Authorized900,000,000135,000,000  6,750,000  
    Issued and Outstanding(a)
    138,103,95120,715,592  1,035,779  
    Authorized and Reserved for Issuance(b)
    37,108,3995,566,259  278,312  
    Authorized and Unreserved and Available for Future Issuance724,787,650108,718,147  5,435,907  
    a.Subject to adjustment for fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.
    b.  Includes shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance (i) upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and settlement of restricted stock units, (ii) remaining under the LTIP and (iii) upon the conversion of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock.

    Vote Required

    Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. Abstentions, failing to vote, and “broker non-votes” will have the same effect as voting “AGAINST” the adoption of this proposal because the required vote is based on the Company's Named Executive Officer compensation.


    Tablenumber of Contents

    shares outstanding rather than the number of votes cast.


    Recommendation

    The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Authorized Share Reduction.



    61




    AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

    The information contained in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be "filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.

    The Board of Directors has determined that all current Audit Committee members are (i) independent, as defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act, (ii) independent under the standards set forth under the NASDAQ Market Rules and (iii) financially literate. In addition, Messrs.Mr. Chronister, Mr. Murdy and MurdyMs. Robertson qualify as audit committee financial experts under the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing committee of the Board established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and operates under a written charter amended as of November 3, 2017,2, 2018, which is reviewed annually.


    Management is responsible for our system of internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and (iii) the independence and performance of our auditors.


    The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with our management and the independent accountants the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles applied, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Management represented to the Audit Committee that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants matters required to be discussed by standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”).


    Our independent accountants also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosure required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding independent accountant'saccountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants that firm'sfirm’s independence.


    Based on the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s discussions with management and the independent accountants, and the Audit Committee'sCommittee’s review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accountants to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, filed with the SEC.


    Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

    Wayne W. Murdy, Chairman
    Marvin M. Chronister, Member
    John S. Gaensbauer, Member
    Audrey Robertson, Member




    62




    Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

    Wayne W. Murdy, Chairman

    Marvin M. Chronister, Member

    Donald L. Evans, Member

    Table of Contents


    STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES


    Any stockholder of the Company who desires to make a nomination of a director nominee or to submit aany other proposal for inclusion in the Company's 2019Company’s 2021 proxy materials must submit such nomination or proposal in writing to the Company, at its principal executive offices at 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202, no earlier than __________, 2021 and no later than __________, 2021. However, if the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 is scheduled for a date more than 30 days before or 60 days after the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, the proposal must be submitted to the Company at its principal executive offices no earlier than 120 before and not later than December 7, 2018, unless90 days before the date of the 2018 Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholders is changed by more than 30 days from May 3, 2018,stockholders to be held in which case the proposal must be received at the Company's principal executive offices a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail its 2019 proxy materials. Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal for action at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but does not wish to have such proposal included in the Company's proxy materials, must submit such proposal to the Company at its principal executive offices by the close of business between January 3, 2019, and February 2, 2019.2021. We will only consider nominations and proposals that meet the requirements of the applicable rules of the SEC and our Bylaws (the "Bylaws"“Bylaws”).


    It is the responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee to identify, evaluate and recommend to the Board of Directors nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as to fill vacancies or additions on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings. The Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to recommend only director candidates who possess the highest personal values and integrity; who have experience and have exhibited achievements in one or more of the key professional, business, financial, legal and other challenges that face a U.S. oil and gas company; who exhibit sound judgment, intelligence, personal character and the ability to make independent analytical inquiries; who demonstrate a willingness to devote adequate time to director duties; and who are likely to be able to serve on the Board of Directors for a sustained period.


    While the Board of Directors does not have a formal policy on diversity, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to achieve an overall balance of diversity among our directors, and it is expected that the Nominating and Governance Committee will view diversity broadly to include diversity of backgrounds, skills and viewpoint as well as traditional diversity concepts such as race or gender, in order to achieve optimal enhancement of the current mix of talent and experience on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes it has achieved that balance through the representation on the Board of Directors of members having experience in the oil and gas industry, accounting and investment analysis and legal and corporate governance, among other areas; however,Additionally, in 2019, upon identifying the Nominatingvaluable expertise and Governance Committee is currently evaluating candidates withexperience that Ms. Robertson contributes, the Board appointed Ms. Robertson as a particular focus on increasingdirector, which increased the Board's gender diversity.diversity of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not discriminate based upon race, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, citizenship or any other legally protected status.


    In identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee solicits recommendations from existing directors and senior management, to be considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee along with any recommendations that have been received from stockholders as discussed in more detail below. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also, in its discretion, retain, and pay fees to, a search firm to provide additional candidates.


    The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider any nominee recommended by stockholders for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2019 if that nomination is submitted in writing by the close of business, between January 3, 2019, and February 2, 2019, to Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc., 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202, Attn: General Counsel.as described above. The Company will evaluate director nominees proposed by stockholders on the same basis as recommendations received from any other source. With respect to each such nominee, the following information must be provided to the Company with the written nomination:


    the name and address of the nominating stockholder, as they appear on the Company'sCompany’s books and of such beneficial owner, if any;

    Table of Contents

      the nominee'snominee’s name and address and other personal information;


    a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among the nominating stockholder or beneficial owner and each proposed nominee;


    a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement, pursuant to the Company'sCompany’s Bylaws, with respect to each nominee for election or re-election to the Board; and


    all other information required to be disclosed pursuant to the Company'sCompany’s Bylaws and Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act.


    63




    Further, the Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Company to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Board or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder'sstockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee.


    The Company suggests that any such proposal be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.


    SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

    Solicitation of proxies may be made via the Internet, by mail, personal interview or telephone by officers, directors and regular employees of the Company. The Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the Common Stock that those companies or persons hold of record, and the Company will reimburse the forwarding expenses. The Company will bear all costs of solicitation.


    STOCKHOLDER LIST

    In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company will maintain at its corporate offices in Denver, Colorado, a list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The list will be open to the examination of any stockholder,available for purposes germane to the Annual Meeting,inspection during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days before the Annual Meeting.

    Meeting at our offices located at 370 17th Street, Suite 5300, Denver, Colorado 80202. The list of stockholders will also be available to stockholders during the Annual Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020.


    AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

    A copy of our 20172019 Annual Report on Form 10-K has been posted on the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com along with this Proxy Statement and our proxy materials to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.materials. The Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered proxy-soliciting material. We will mail without charge, upon written request, a copy of our 20172019 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including exhibits.exhibits, to any stockholder. Please send a written request to our General Counsel at:


    Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.
    370 17th Street, Suite 5300
    Denver, Colorado 80202
    Attention: General Counsel
    Or by calling: 720-557-8300


    The charters for our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Financial Code of Ethics are in the "Corporate Governance"“Corporate Governance” section of our corporate website, which iswww.extractionog.com, and are also available in print without charge upon written request to our General Counsel at the address above.


    Table of Contents

    Stockholders residing in the same household who hold their stock through a bank or broker may receive only a single copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials in accordance with a notice sent earlier by their bank or broker. This practice will continue unless instructions to the contrary are received by your bank or broker from one or more of the stockholders within the household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials to such stockholders upon receipt of a written or oral request to our General Counsel at the address above, or by calling (720) 557-8300.


    If you hold your shares in street name and reside in a household that received only one copy of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials, you can request to receive a separate copy in the future by following the instructions sent by your bank or broker. If your household is receiving multiple copies of the Notice and, if applicable, our proxy materials, you may request that only a single set of materials be sent by following the instructions sent by your bank or broker.


    64




    OTHER MATTERS

    As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board does not intend to present any matters other than those described herein at the Annual Meeting and is unaware of any matters to be presented by other parties. If other matters are properly brought before the meeting for action by the stockholders, proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holder.


    DIRECTIONS TO
    LOCATION OF ANNUAL MEETING

    The 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at The Sheraton Denver Downtown, 1550 Court Place, Denver, Colorado 80202.


    virtually, conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the annual meeting of stockholders online and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/XOG2020.

    65


    VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.


    APPENDIX A

    FORM OF
    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
    CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
    EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INC. 370 17TH STREET, SUITE 5300 DENVER, CO 80202 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like

    The undersigned, Eric J. Christ, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify as follows:

    FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.

    SECOND: This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to reduce the costs incurred by our companyCertificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Certificate”) was duly adopted in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail oraccordance with the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please followprovisions of Section 242 of the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E39994-P03948 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INCDelaware General Corporation Law. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORhas duly adopted resolutions setting forth and declaring advisable this Amendment and the electionholders of a majority of the following directors: For Withhold AllAll For All Except To withholdoutstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at the meeting of the stockholders called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware for the purpose of voting on the Amendment have voted in favor of this Amendment.

    THIRD: The Certificate is hereby amended by amending and restating the first sentence of Article Four to be and read as follows:

    The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to vote for any individual nominee(s)issue is __________ shares of capital stock, which shall be divided into two classes, consisting of (i) 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s)(ii) __________ shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”).

    Each __________ shares of the nominee(s)Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) issued and outstanding on the line below. ! ! ! 1. Electioneffective date of Directors Nominees: 01) Patrick D. O'Brien 02) Marvin M. Chronister The Boardthis Amendment shall automatically be combined into one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Directors recommends you vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! 2. To ratifyCommon Stock, without any action by the appointmentholder thereof, subject to the treatment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPfractional interests as described below (the “Reverse Stock Split”). No certificates representing fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued in connection with the Company's independent registered public accountants for 2018. 3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis,Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional share interests of Common Stock in connection with the compensationReverse Stock Split shall, with respect to such fractional interest, be entitled to receive cash, without interest, in lieu of fractional shares of Common Stock, in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the average of the Company's Named Executive Officersclosing sales price of the Common Stock during regular trading hours for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORfive consecutive trading days immediately preceding the frequency of 1 year on the following Proposal: 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Abstain ! ! ! ! 4. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, how frequently the Company should seek an advisory vote on the compensationeffective date of the Company's Named Executive Officers. ! For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them onReverse Stock Split (with such average closing sales prices being adjusted to give effect to the back where indicated. ! Yes ! No Please indicate if you planReverse Stock Split). Each certificate that prior to attend this meeting Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


    Important Notice Regarding the Availabilitysuch combination represented shares of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. E39995-P03948 EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INC. Annual MeetingCommon Stock (“Old Certificates”) shall thereafter represent that number of Stockholders May 3, 2018, 8:00 AM MDT This proxy is solicited by the Boardshares of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Russell T. Kelley, Jr. and Eric J. Christ, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on this proxy, all ofCommon Stock into which the shares of Common Stock represented by the Old Certificate shall have been combined, subject to the elimination of fractional share interests as described above.


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this amendment on behalf of the Corporation and has attested such execution and does verify and affirm, under penalty of perjury, that this amendment is the act and deed of the Corporation and that the facts stated herein are true as of this __________ day of __________, __________.

    EXTRACTION OIL & GAS, INC. held of record by the undersigned on the record date, March 14, 2018, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at The Sheraton Denver Downtown, 1550 Court Place, Denver, Colorado 80202, on Thursday May 3, 2018 at 8:00 AM, MDT,INC.


    By:___________________________________
    Eric J. Christ
    Vice President, General Counsel and any adjournment thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of each of the nominees in Item 1, FOR Items 2 and 3 and FOR the frequency of "1 Year" in proposal 4. In his discretion, the proxy is authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side Address Changes/Comments:Corporate
    Secretary

    A-1
    66





    image2.jpg
    67




    image1.jpg
    68